Understanding the Difference between RBAC Roles and Azure AD Roles (2024)

Microsoft Azure provides powerful tools to manage access and permissions within its ecosystem in the world of cloud computing and identity management. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) roles are two critical concepts in access governance. While they may appear similar at first glance, they serve different functions and are intended for different scenarios. In this article, we'll look at the differences between RBAC roles and Azure AD roles, as well as how they contribute to secure and efficient access management in Azure.

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC):

RBAC is a widely used access control model that allows administrators to assign specific roles to Azure users, groups, or service principals. RBAC's fundamental idea is to regulate access based on the principle of "least privilege," granting users only the permissions they need to perform their tasks and thus reducing the risk of unauthorised access.

Important information about RBAC roles:

Granularity: RBAC provides a fine-grained approach to access control, allowing different roles to be assigned at the subscription, resource group, and resource levels. Azure includes built-in roles such as Owner, Contributor, Reader, and many more. You can also create custom roles that are tailored to the needs of your organisation.
Scope: RBAC roles are limited to Azure resources such as virtual machines, storage accounts, databases, and other services. These roles have authority over management operations pertaining to those resources.
Resource-Centric: RBAC roles are inextricably linked to Azure resources. Users with assigned roles can manage those resources, but they do not have access to the Azure AD identities.
Managing Access within Azure: RBAC controls access to Azure resources only and does not control access to non-Azure resources such as on-premises applications or third-party SaaS applications.

Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Roles:

On the other hand, Azure AD is an identity and access management service that enables user and device authentication and authorization across Azure and other integrated applications. Azure AD roles, also known as directory roles, are used to manage access to Azure AD resources and to control identity and access management actions.

Important information about Azure AD roles:

Recommended by LinkedIn

Understanding the Difference between RBAC Roles and Azure AD Roles (1)

How Entra ID Elevates Azure AD’s Functionality: What…

How RBAC Roles and Azure AD Roles Work Together:

While RBAC roles and Azure AD roles serve different functions, they frequently collaborate to provide comprehensive access management within the Azure environment:

RBAC controls access to Azure resources: Administrators control access to various Azure resources and services by assigning RBAC roles to users.
Azure AD roles manage identity and access tasks: Actions related to user and group management, application registrations, and other directory-related operations are controlled by Azure AD roles.
Combining Roles for Comprehensive Access Control: To perform their duties effectively within Azure, users may require both RBAC roles (for resource management) and Azure AD roles (for identity and access management).

Conclusion:

In summary, RBAC roles and Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) roles are both critical components of access management within the Azure ecosystem, but they serve different purposes. RBAC focuses on resource-centric access control within Azure, whereas Azure AD roles are used in the Azure AD tenant for identity and access management tasks.

Organizations can ensure secure and efficient access to Azure resources, manage identities effectively, and maintain compliance with their security policies by understanding the distinction between these roles and leveraging them appropriately.