We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data. RTX 6000 2018 24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt 48.73 RTX 4090 2022 24 GB GDDR6X, 450 Watt 100.00 +105% GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RX 580 Arc A580 RX 5700 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX RTX 4090 outperforms RTX 6000 by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results. RTX 6000 RTX 4090 GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. RTX 4090 has 448% better value for money than RTX 6000. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. RTX 600048.73 RTX 4090100.00 +105% This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. RTX 600018797 RTX 409038574 +105% Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: −118% +118% −109% +109% −111% +111% Full HD +0% +0% Full HD +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% Full HD +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% Full HD +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% Full HD +0% +0% 1440p +0% +0% +0% +0% 1440p +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% 1440p +0% +0% 4K +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% 4K +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% +0% 4K +0% +0% This is how RTX 6000 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games: All in all, in popular games: RTX 6000 has 73.1% lower power consumption. RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 105.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process. The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 6000 in performance tests. Be aware that Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Quadro RTX 6000 GeForce RTX 4090 Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 3.8125 votes Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.713225 votes Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 66 1 Place by popularity not in top-100 5 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 5.41 29.66 Architecture Turing (2018−2022) Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) GPU code name TU102 AD102-300-A1 Market segment Workstation Desktop Release date 13 August 2018 (6 years ago) 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) Launch price (MSRP) $6,299 $1,599 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 4608 16384 Core clock speed 1440 MHz 2235 MHz Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 2520 MHz Number of transistors 18,600 million 76,300 million Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 5 nm Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 450 Watt Texture fill rate 509.8 1,290 Floating-point performance 16.31 gflops 82.58 gflops Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Length 267 mm 304 mm Width 2-slot 3-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1x 16-pin VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 24 GB Memory bus width 384 Bit 384 Bit Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 21000 MHz Memory bandwidth 672.0 GB/s 1,008 GB/s Shared memory - - Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a HDMI - + API compatibility
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_2) Shader Model 6.5 6.6 OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 2.0 3.0 Vulkan 1.2.131 1.3 CUDA 7.5 8.9 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
Gaming performance
Average FPS across all PC games
Full HD 120−130 262 1440p 100−110 209 4K 70−75 148 FPS performance in popular games
Low PresetCyberpunk 2077 225 225
Medium PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 235 235 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 287 287 Battlefield 5 240−250 240−250 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130 120−130 Cyberpunk 2077 222 222 Far Cry 5 110−120 110−120 Far Cry New Dawn 200−210 200−210 Forza Horizon 4 290−300 290−300 Hitman 3 120−130 120−130 Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400 350−400 Metro Exodus 150−160 150−160 Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130 120−130 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 450−500 450−500 Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160 150−160
High PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 200−210 200−210 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 248 248 Battlefield 5 240−250 240−250 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130 120−130 Cyberpunk 2077 214 214 Far Cry 5 110−120 110−120 Far Cry New Dawn 200−210 200−210 Forza Horizon 4 290−300 290−300 Hitman 3 120−130 120−130 Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400 350−400 Metro Exodus 150−160 150−160 Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130 120−130 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 548 548 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 240−250 240−250 Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160 150−160
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 179 179 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 220 220 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130 120−130 Cyberpunk 2077 210 210 Far Cry 5 110−120 110−120 Forza Horizon 4 290−300 290−300 Hitman 3 120−130 120−130 Horizon Zero Dawn 394 394 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 541 541 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 305 305 Watch Dogs: Legion 153 153
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 120−130 120−130
High PresetBattlefield 5 160−170 160−170 Far Cry New Dawn 110−120 110−120
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 155 155 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 183 183 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 80−85 Cyberpunk 2077 154 154 Far Cry 5 80−85 80−85 Forza Horizon 4 270−280 270−280 Hitman 3 130−140 130−140 Horizon Zero Dawn 388 388 Metro Exodus 152 152 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 504 504 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 268 268 Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250 240−250
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 120−130 120−130
High PresetBattlefield 5 85−90 85−90 Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 65−70 Hitman 3 80−85 80−85 Horizon Zero Dawn 105 105 Metro Exodus 140−150 140−150 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 281 281
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 120 120 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120 120 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 50−55 Cyberpunk 2077 80 80 Far Cry 5 50−55 50−55 Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 282 282 Watch Dogs: Legion 117 117
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 110−120 110−120 Pros & cons summary
Performance score 48.73 100.00 Recency 13 August 2018 20 September 2022 Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 450 Watt Vote for your favorite
![RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (5)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/en/video_images/156/image?thumbnail=yes&maxwidth=38&maxheight=38&webp=1 "RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (5)")
![RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (6)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/en/video_logotypes/3/image?thumbnail=yes&maxwidth=38&maxheight=38 "RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (6)")
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
![RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (29)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile_sad.png "RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (29)")
![RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (30)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile.png "RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (30)")
Questions & comments
Quadro RTX6000 vsQuadro RTX8000
GeForce RTX4090 vsGeForce RTX4080
Quadro RTX6000 vsRadeon PROW7700
Quadro RTX6000 vsGeForce RTX4080
Quadro RTX6000 vsGeForce RTX4070
Quadro RTX6000 vsGeForce RTX4060
Quadro RTX6000 vsGeForce RTX4080 Ti
Quadro RTX6000 vsRadeon RX6650 XT
Quadro RTX6000 vsH100PCIe
Quadro RTX6000 vsRTXA5500
Quadro RTX6000 vsRTX A5500Mobile
![RTX 4090 vs RTX 6000 [1-Benchmark Showdown] (2024)]()