Market Manipulation of Cryptocurrencies: Evidence from Social Media and Transaction Data (2024)

research-article

Authors: Wen Li, Lingfeng Bao, Jiachi Chen, John Grundy, Xin Xia, Xiaohu Yang

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, Volume 24, Issue 2

Article No.: 8, Pages 1 - 26

Published: 18 March 2024 Publication History

Metrics

Total Citations0Total Downloads571

Last 12 Months571

Last 6 weeks46

New Citation Alert added!

This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:

You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.

To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.

Manage my Alerts

New Citation Alert!

Please log in to your account

Get Access

    • Get Access
    • References
    • Media
    • Tables
    • Share

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market cap has experienced a great increase in recent years. However, large price fluctuations demonstrate the need for governance structures and identify whether there are market manipulations. In this article, we conduct three analyses—social media data analysis, blockchain data analysis, and price bubble analysis—to investigate whether market manipulation exists on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin platforms. Social media data analysis aims to find the reasons for price fluctuations. Blockchain data analysis is used to find detailed behavior of the manipulators. Price bubble analysis is used to investigate the relation between price fluctuation and manipulators’ behavior. By using the three analyses, we show that market manipulation exists on Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin. However, market manipulation of Bitcoin is limited, and for most of Bitcoin’s price fluctuations, we found other explanations. The price for Ethereum is the most sensitive to technical updates. Technical companies/teams usually hype some new concepts (e.g., ICO, DeFi), which causes a price spike. The price of Dogecoin has a high correlation with Elon Musk’s X (formerly known as Twitter) activity, showing that influential individuals have the ability to manipulate its prices. In addition, the poor monetary liquidity of Dogecoin allows some users to manipulate its price.

References

[1]

Adebayo Adedokun. 2019. Bitcoin-Altcoin price synchronization hypothesis: Evidence from recent data. Journal of Finance and Economics 7, 4 (2019), 137–147.

[2]

C. Alexander and D. F. Heck. 2020. Price discovery in Bitcoin: The impact of unregulated markets. Journal of Financial Stability 50 (2020), 100776.

[3]

Lennart Ante. 2023. How Elon Musk’s Twitter activity moves cryptocurrency markets. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 186, A (2023), 122112.

[4]

Paul Barnes2018. Crypto currency and its susceptibility to speculative bubbles, manipulation, scams and fraud. Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance 9, 2 (18) (2018), 60–77.

[5]

Dirk G. Baur and Thomas Dimpfl. 2018. Asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters 173 (2018), 148–151.

[6]

Walter Bazán-Palomino. 2021. How are Bitcoin forks related to Bitcoin? Finance Research Letters 40 (2021), 101723.

[7]

David M. Blei and John D. Lafferty. 2007. A correlated topic model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics 1, 1 (2007), 17–35.

[8]

David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003), 993–1022.

Digital Library

[9]

Dmitri Boreiko and Navroop K. Sahdev. 2018. To ICO or not to ICO—Empirical analysis of initial coin offerings and token sales. SSRN. Retrieved February 5, 2024 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3209180

[10]

Jamal Bouoiyour, Refk Selmi, Aviral Kumar Tiwari, and Olaolu Olayeni. 2016. What drives Bitcoin price. Economics Bulletin 36, 2 (2016), 843–850.

[11]

Vitalik Buterin. 2013. Ethereum White Paper. GitHub Repository.

[12]

Eng-Tuck Cheah and John Fry. 2015. Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin. Economics Letters 130 (2015), 32–36.

[13]

Jialan Chen, Dan Lin, and Jiajing Wu. 2022. Do cryptocurrency exchanges fake trading volumes? An empirical analysis of wash trading based on data mining. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 586 (2022), 126405.

[14]

Jiachi Chen, Xin Xia, David Lo, John Grundy, Xiapu Luo, and Ting Chen. 2022. Defining smart contract defects on Ethereum. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48, 1 (2022), 327–345.

[15]

Liang Chen, Jiaying Peng, Yang Liu, Jintang Li, Fenfang Xie, and Zibin Zheng. 2020. Phishing scams detection in Ethereum transaction network. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 21, 1 (2020), 1–16.

Digital Library

[16]

Ting Chen, Yuxiao Zhu, Zihao Li, Jiachi Chen, Xiaoqi Li, Xiapu Luo, Xiaodong Lin, and Xiaosong Zhange. 2018. Understanding Ethereum via graph analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’18). IEEE, 1484–1492.

Digital Library

[17]

Weili Chen, Jun Wu, Zibin Zheng, Chuan Chen, and Yuren Zhou. 2019. Market manipulation of Bitcoin: Evidence from mining the Mt. Gox transaction network. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’19). 964–972.

Digital Library

[18]

Weili Chen, YueJin Xu, Zibin Zheng, Yuren Zhou, Jianxun Eileen Yang, and Jing Bian. 2019. Detecting “pump & dump schemes” on cryptocurrency market using an improved apriori algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE’19). IEEE, 293–2935.

[19]

Weili Chen, Zibin Zheng, Jiahui Cui, Edith Ngai, Peilin Zheng, and Yuren Zhou. 2018. Detecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: Towards healthier blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. 1409–1418.

Digital Library

[20]

Adrian Cheung, Eduardo Roca, and Jen-Je Su. 2015. Crypto-currency bubbles: An application of the Phillips–Shi–Yu (2013) methodology on Mt. Gox Bitcoin prices. Applied Economics 47, 23 (2015), 2348–2358.

[21]

Usman W. Chohan. 2021. A History of Dogecoin. Discussion Series: Notes on the 21st Century. Retrieved February 5, 2024 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3091219

[22]

Pavel Ciaian, Miroslava Rajcaniova, and d’Artis Kancs. 2018. Virtual relationships: Short- and long-run evidence from BitCoin and Altcoin markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 52 (2018), 173–195.

[23]

Shaen Corbet, Brian Lucey, and Larisa Yarovaya. 2018. Datestamping the Bitcoin and Ethereum bubbles. Finance Research Letters 26 (2018), 81–88.

[24]

Michel Cândido de Souza, Elder Tiago da Costa de Souza, and Hugo Carcanholo Iasco Pereira. 2017. Cryptocurrencies bubbles: New evidences. Empirical Economics Letters 16, 7 (2017), 739–746.

[25]

Anirudh Dhawan and Tālis J. Putniņš. 2023. A new wolf in town? Pump-and-dump manipulation in cryptocurrency markets. Review of Finance 27, 3 (2023), 935–975.

[26]

R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error-correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 2 (1987), 251–276.

[27]

Shuhui Fan, Shaojing Fu, Yuchuan Luo, Haoran Xu, Xuyun Zhang, and Ming Xu. 2022. Smart contract scams detection with topological data analysis on account interaction. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 468–477.

Digital Library

[28]

Gianni Fenu, Lodovica Marchesi, Michele Marchesi, and Roberto Tonelli. 2018. The ICO phenomenon and its relationships with Ethereum smart contract environment. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE’18). IEEE, 26–32.

[29]

John Fry and Eng-Tuck Cheah. 2016. Negative bubbles and shocks in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis 47 (2016), 343–352.

[30]

Neil Gandal, J. T. Hamrick, Tyler Moore, and Tali Oberman. 2018. Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Journal of Monetary Economics 95 (2018), 86–96.

[31]

David Garcia, Claudio J. Tessone, Pavlin Mavrodiev, and Nicolas Perony. 2014. The digital traces of bubbles: Feedback cycles between socio-economic signals in the Bitcoin economy. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 11, 99 (2014), 20140623.

[32]

Adem Efe Gencer, Soumya Basu, Ittay Eyal, Robbert van Renesse, and Emin Gün Sirer. 2018. Decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethereum networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 439–457.

Digital Library

[33]

Google. 2021. Google BigQuery Introduction.Retrieved Dec 28, 2021 from https://cloud.google.com/bigquery

[34]

John M. Griffin and Amin Shams. 2020. Is Bitcoin really untethered? Journal of Finance 75, 4 (2020), 1913–1964.

[35]

Adam Hayes. 2015. What factors give cryptocurrencies their value: An empirical analysis. SSRN. Retrieved February 5, 2024 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2579445

[36]

Adam S. Hayes. 2019. Bitcoin price and its marginal cost of production: Support for a fundamental value. Applied Economics Letters 26, 7 (2019), 554–560.

[37]

Frankenfield Jake and Overcast Kimberly. 2022. Initial Coin Offering (ICO): Coin Launch Defined, with Examples. Retrieved January 3, 2022 from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/initial-coin-offering-ico.asp

[38]

Josh Kamps and Bennett Kleinberg. 2018. To the moon: Defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps. Crime Science 7, 1 (2018), 1–18.

[39]

Ladislav Kristoufek. 2015. What are the main drivers of the Bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. PLoS ONE 10, 4 (2015), e0123923.

[40]

Ladislav Kristoufek. 2019. Is the Bitcoin price dynamics economically reasonable? Evidence from fundamental laws. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 536 (2019), 120873.

[41]

Ladislav Kristoufek. 2023. Will Bitcoin ever become less volatile? Finance Research Letters 51 (2023), 103353.

[42]

Jan Kubal and Ladislav Kristoufek. 2022. Exploring the relationship between Bitcoin price and network’s hashrate within endogenous system. International Review of Financial Analysis 84 (2022), 102375. DOI:

[43]

Sinan Küfeoğlu and Mahmut Özkuran. 2019. Bitcoin mining: A global review of energy and power demand. Energy Research & Social Science 58 (2019), 101273.

[44]

Nikolaos Kyriazis, Stephanos Papadamou, and Shaen Corbet. 2020. A systematic review of the bubble dynamics of cryptocurrency prices. Research in International Business and Finance 54 (2020), 101254.

[45]

Massimo La Morgia, Alessandro Mei, Francesco Sassi, and Julinda Stefa. 2020. Pump and dumps in the Bitcoin era: Real time detection of cryptocurrency market manipulations. In Proceedings of the 2020 29th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN’20). IEEE, 1–9.

[46]

Massimo La Morgia, Alessandro Mei, Francesco Sassi, and Julinda Stefa. 2021. The Doge of wall street: Analysis and detection of pump and dump cryptocurrency manipulations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.00733 (2021).

[47]

S. F. Leroy and R. D. Porter. 1981. Stock price volatility: A test based on implied variance bounds. Econometrica 49, 3 (1981), 555–574.

[48]

Xin Li and Chong Alex Wang. 2017. The technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: The case of Bitcoin. Decision Support Systems 95 (2017), 49–60. DOI:

Digital Library

[49]

Daniel Liebau and Patrick Scheuffel. 2019. Cryptocurrencies & initial coin offerings: Are they scams? An empirical study. Journal of British Blockchain Association 2, 1 (2019), 1–7.

[50]

Lukáš Pichl and Taisei Kaizoji. 2017. Volatility analysis of Bitcoin price time series. Quantitative Finance and Economics 1 (2017), 474–485.

[51]

Akash Malhotra and Mayank Maloo. 2014. Bitcoin—Is it a bubble? Evidence from unit root tests. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Evidence from Unit Root Tests.

[52]

Dan McGinn, David Birch, David Akroyd, Miguel Molina-Solana, Yike Guo, and William J. Knottenbelt. 2016. Visualizing dynamic Bitcoin transaction patterns. Big Data 4, 2 (2016), 109–119.

[53]

Mehrnoosh Mirtaheri, Sami Abu-El-Haija, Fred Morstatter, Greg Ver Steeg, and Aram Galstyan. 2021. Identifying and analyzing cryptocurrency manipulations in social media. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 8, 3 (2021), 607–617.

[54]

Tyler Moore, Nicolas Christin, and Janos Szurdi. 2018. Revisiting the risks of Bitcoin currency exchange closure. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 18, 4 (2018), 1–18.

Digital Library

[55]

Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved February 5, 2024 from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

[56]

P. C. B Phillips, S. P. Shi, and J. Yu. 2013. Testing for Multiple Bubbles 1: Historical Episodes of Exuberance and Collapse in the S&P 500. School of Economics, Singapore Management University.

[57]

Peter C. B. Phillips, Yangru Wu, and Jun Yu. 2011. Explosive behavior in the 1990s Nasdaq: When did exuberance escalate asset values? International Economic Review 52, 1 (2011), 201–226.

[58]

Marc Pilkington. 2016. Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In Research Handbook on Digital Transformations. Edward Elgar Publishing.

[59]

Burak Pirgaip, Burcu Dinçergök, and Şüheda Haşlak. 2019. Bitcoin market price analysis and an empirical comparison with main currencies, commodities, securities and Altcoins. In Blockchain Economics and Financial Market Innovation: Financial Innovations in the Digital Age. Springer, 141–166.

[60]

Rakesh Sharma and Amilcar Chavarria. 2022. What Is Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and How Does It Work? Retrieved January 13, 2022 from https://www.investopedia.com/decentralized-finance-defi-5113835

[61]

Raynor de Best. 2021. Cryptocurrency Market Value. Retrieved December 29, 2021 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/730876/cryptocurrency-maket-value/

[62]

Svetlana Sapuric and Angelika Kokkinaki. 2014. Bitcoin is volatile! Isn’t that right? In Business Information Workshops. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 183. Springer, 255–265.

[63]

Fabian Schär. 2021. Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets. SSRN. Retrieved February 5, 2024 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3571335

[64]

Yahya Shahsavari, Kaiwen Zhang, and Chamseddine Talhi. 2019. A theoretical model for fork analysis in the Bitcoin network. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain’19). IEEE, 237–244.

[65]

Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, Muhammad Anas, and Elie Bouri. 2022. Price explosiveness in cryptocurrencies and Elon Musk’s Tweets. Finance Research Letters 47, B (2022), 102695.

[66]

Yhlas Sovbetov. 2018. Factors influencing cryptocurrency prices: Evidence from Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dash, Litcoin, and Monero. Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis 2, 2 (2018), 1–27.

[67]

Donna Spencer. 2009. Card Sorting: Designing Usable Categories. Rosenfeld Media.

[68]

Marie Vasek and Tyler Moore. 2015. There’s no free lunch, even using Bitcoin: Tracking the popularity and profits of virtual currency scams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. 44–61.

[69]

Dejan Vujičić, Dijana Jagodić, and Siniša Ranđić. 2018. Blockchain technology, Bitcoin, and Ethereum: A brief overview. In Proceedings of the 2018 17th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH’18). IEEE, 1–6.

[70]

Wang Chun Wei. 2018. The impact of tether grants on Bitcoin. Economics Letters 171 (2018), 19–22.

[71]

Wikipedia. 2021. Dogecoin. Retrieved December 29, 2021 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogecoin

[72]

Ines Wöckl. 2019. Bubble detection in financial markets—A survey of theoretical bubble models and empirical bubble detection tests. SSRN. Retrieved February 5, 2024 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3460430

[73]

Gavin Wood. 2017. Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger. Yellow Paper. Ethereum.

[74]

Pengcheng Xia, Haoyu Wang, Bingyu Gao, Weihang Su, Zhou Yu, Xiapu Luo, Chao Zhang, Xusheng Xiao, and Guoai Xu. 2021. Trade or trick? Detecting and characterizing scam tokens on Uniswap decentralized exchange. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems 5, 3 (2021), 1–26.

Digital Library

[75]

Yuan Yiming, Du Hai, Shi Junjing, and Xiao Xiao. 2021. Huobi Weekly Report Analysis. Vol. 26. Retrieved Aug 17, 2018, from https://medium.com/hbus-official/big-data-weekly-26-cbc20cd979c9

[76]

Julie Young. 2021. Representative Sample. Retrieved October 29, 2021 from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/representative-sample.asp

[77]

Avi Mizrahi. 2017. Ethereum founder vitalik buterin: We are in an ICO bubble. Finance Magnates. https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/news/ethereum-founder-vitalik-buterin-ico-bubble/

Index Terms

  1. Market Manipulation of Cryptocurrencies: Evidence from Social Media and Transaction Data

    1. Applied computing

      1. Law, social and behavioral sciences

        1. Economics

      2. Information systems

        1. Information retrieval

          1. Retrieval tasks and goals

            1. Information extraction

      Recommendations

      • Volatility Interdependence Between Cryptocurrencies, Equity, and Bond Markets

        Abstract

        This paper investigates (i) the return-volatility spillover between Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, and Litecoin, (ii) the interdependence between cryptocurrencies’ volatility and the US equity and bond markets’ volatility, and (iii) the impact of the ...

        Read More

      • Stake Shift in Major Cryptocurrencies: An Empirical Study

        Financial Cryptography and Data Security

        Abstract

        In the proof-of-stake (PoS) paradigm for maintaining decentralized, permissionless cryptocurrencies, Sybil attacks are prevented by basing the distribution of roles in the protocol execution on the stake distribution recorded in the ledger itself. ...

        Read More

      • Transaction fee mechanism design

        Demand for blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum is far larger than supply, necessitating a mechanism that selects a subset of transactions to include "on-chain" from the pool of all pending transactions. EIP-1559 is a proposal to make several ...

        Read More

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      Market Manipulation of Cryptocurrencies: Evidence from Social Media and Transaction Data (7)

      ACM Transactions on Internet Technology Volume 24, Issue 2

      May 2024

      96 pages

      EISSN:1557-6051

      DOI:10.1145/3613553

      • Editor:
      • Ling Liu

        Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [emailprotected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 18 March 2024

      Online AM: 30 January 2024

      Accepted: 25 January 2024

      Revised: 21 November 2023

      Received: 30 January 2023

      Published inTOITVolume 24, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Blockchain
      2. cryptocurrencies
      3. market manipulation
      4. empirical study

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • National Key Research and Development Program of China
      • National Science Foundation of China
      • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
      • ARC Laureate Fellowship

      Contributors

      Market Manipulation of Cryptocurrencies: Evidence from Social Media and Transaction Data (8)

      Other Metrics

      View Article Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Total Citations

      • 571

        Total Downloads

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)571
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)46

      Reflects downloads up to 25 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      View Author Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      Get this Article

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Market Manipulation of Cryptocurrencies: Evidence from Social Media and Transaction Data (2024)

      FAQs

      How does social media influence cryptocurrency? ›

      Social media and other media outlets can cause cryptocurrency price fluctuations, for better or for worse. Trending news about a large digital currency exchange hack can cause a significant drop in digital currency value. For example, when Hong Kong based exchange Bitfinex was hacked, Bitcoin value dropped 20 percent.

      How do market makers manipulate Bitcoins? ›

      Market makers offer to buy (bid) and sell (ask) a crypto asset at different prices. The difference between these two prices is known as the spread. A narrower spread generally indicates a more liquid market, whereas a wider spread suggests less liquidity and higher trading costs.

      Is it legal to manipulate the crypto market? ›

      The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States has taken enforcement actions against individuals and companies engaged in market manipulation, imposing fines and other penalties.

      What are the social impacts of cryptocurrency? ›

      As digital currencies become more mainstream, they are reshaping economies and empowering communities globally. One of the key social impacts is financial inclusion, as cryptocurrencies provide access to financial services for the unbanked and underbanked populations.

      What social media is most used for crypto? ›

      Twitter is a widely used platform for sharing crypto news, updates, and opinions, allowing for real-time engagement with the audience. Twitter's real-time nature makes it ideal for crypto community engagement, with strategies including: Regular updates. The use of hashtags.

      What influences the cryptocurrency market? ›

      While supply and demand are the two key factors that determine the price of a cryptocurrency, there are however a range of other factors that may influence supply and demand - like utility, mass adoption, tokenomics, and market sentiment, all of which we'll explore in this guide.

      How do market makers manipulate the market? ›

      TH E MARKET MAKER

      In theory, they will buy low, which reduces the decline in price per share (PPS), and sell high, which reduces the rise in PPS. Therefore, these profit-making behaviors are presumed to provide a stabilizing effect on changes in the PPS of the stocks they make a market in.

      Who is really controlling the Bitcoin market? ›

      Bitcoin is neither issued nor regulated by a central government and, therefore, is not subject to governmental monetary policies. Bitcoin's price is primarily affected by its supply, the market's demand, availability, competing cryptocurrencies, and investor sentiment.

      How do market manipulators work? ›

      Market manipulation may involve techniques including: Spreading false or misleading information about a company; Engaging in a series of transactions to make a security appear more actively traded; and. Rigging quotes, prices, or trades to make it look like there is more or less demand for a security than is the case.

      What is an example of market manipulation in crypto? ›

      As with its conventional counterpart, crypto insider trading involves using material non-public information to buy or sell digital assets ahead of market moving events. One such example is buying a large number of tokens prior to a public exchange listing announcement and profiting from subsequent price rises.

      Is there a way to manipulate cryptocurrency? ›

      Cryptocurrency markets, like stock markets, can be influenced by various factors such as market speculation, large trades by institutional investors, market manipulation tactics like pump and dump schemes, and even social media influence.

      Can you get in trouble for market manipulation? ›

      At its heart, however, stock market manipulation is considered a form of securities fraud, and more severe instances may be charged as such under 18 U.S.C. 1348 securities and commodities fraud. A conviction under this statute can result in up to 25 years in prison.

      What is the most socially responsible cryptocurrency? ›

      Top 10 Greenest Cryptocurrencies
      • Cardano (ADA) Frequently, people acknowledge Cardano as the most environmentally friendly cryptocurrency. ...
      • Tezos (XTZ) People praise Tezos, a PoS-based cryptocurrency, for its sustainable approach. ...
      • BitGreen (BITG) ...
      • Chia (XCH) ...
      • IOTA (MIOTA) ...
      • EOS (EOS) ...
      • Stellar (XLM) ...
      • Nano (NANO)
      Feb 26, 2024

      What are the biggest risks that people using cryptocurrency face? ›

      Cryptocurrency Risks
      • Cryptocurrency payments do not come with legal protections. Credit cards and debit cards have legal protections if something goes wrong. ...
      • Cryptocurrency payments typically are not reversible. ...
      • Some information about your transactions will likely be public.

      What are the social issues of blockchain? ›

      Socially, blockchain is positioned to address labor abuses, improve working conditions, and combat corruption through enhanced transparency and accountability. However, risks such as illicit financing and high energy consumption are acknowledged.

      How does news affect the crypto market? ›

      The most dominant cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, experiences a “negativity effect,” i.e., the impact of negative news on returns is higher than positive news. On the volatility and liquidity front, positive (negative) news increases (decreases) the volatility and liquidity.

      How does blockchain affect social media? ›

      Enhancing Prevention Efforts with Blockchain

      By implementing blockchain-based identity verification systems, social media platforms can ensure that users are who they claim to be, thereby reducing the risk of impersonation and identity fraud.

      What is the network effect in cryptocurrency? ›

      In the context of Blockchain, network effects occur when the value of a cryptocurrency increases as more people use it. For instance, the market value and acceptance of Bitcoin increases as more people adopt it.

      Top Articles
      The Vital Line: Why You Shouldn't Mix Personal and Business Expenses
      New, lower costs on Marketplace coverage
      Katie Pavlich Bikini Photos
      Gamevault Agent
      Hocus Pocus Showtimes Near Harkins Theatres Yuma Palms 14
      Free Atm For Emerald Card Near Me
      Craigslist Mexico Cancun
      Hendersonville (Tennessee) – Travel guide at Wikivoyage
      Doby's Funeral Home Obituaries
      Vardis Olive Garden (Georgioupolis, Kreta) ✈️ inkl. Flug buchen
      Select Truck Greensboro
      Things To Do In Atlanta Tomorrow Night
      How To Cut Eelgrass Grounded
      Pac Man Deviantart
      Alexander Funeral Home Gallatin Obituaries
      Craigslist In Flagstaff
      Shasta County Most Wanted 2022
      Energy Healing Conference Utah
      Testberichte zu E-Bikes & Fahrrädern von PROPHETE.
      Aaa Saugus Ma Appointment
      Geometry Review Quiz 5 Answer Key
      Walgreens Alma School And Dynamite
      Bible Gateway passage: Revelation 3 - New Living Translation
      Yisd Home Access Center
      Home
      Shadbase Get Out Of Jail
      Gina Wilson Angle Addition Postulate
      Celina Powell Lil Meech Video: A Controversial Encounter Shakes Social Media - Video Reddit Trend
      Walmart Pharmacy Near Me Open
      Dmv In Anoka
      A Christmas Horse - Alison Senxation
      Ou Football Brainiacs
      Access a Shared Resource | Computing for Arts + Sciences
      Pixel Combat Unblocked
      Cvs Sport Physicals
      Mercedes W204 Belt Diagram
      Rogold Extension
      'Conan Exiles' 3.0 Guide: How To Unlock Spells And Sorcery
      Teenbeautyfitness
      Weekly Math Review Q4 3
      Facebook Marketplace Marrero La
      Nobodyhome.tv Reddit
      Topos De Bolos Engraçados
      Gregory (Five Nights at Freddy's)
      Grand Valley State University Library Hours
      Holzer Athena Portal
      Hampton In And Suites Near Me
      Stoughton Commuter Rail Schedule
      Bedbathandbeyond Flemington Nj
      Free Carnival-themed Google Slides & PowerPoint templates
      Otter Bustr
      Selly Medaline
      Latest Posts
      Article information

      Author: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

      Last Updated:

      Views: 6086

      Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

      Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

      Author information

      Name: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

      Birthday: 1993-01-10

      Address: Suite 391 6963 Ullrich Shore, Bellefort, WI 01350-7893

      Phone: +6806610432415

      Job: Dynamic Manufacturing Assistant

      Hobby: amateur radio, Taekwondo, Wood carving, Parkour, Skateboarding, Running, Rafting

      Introduction: My name is Pres. Lawanda Wiegand, I am a inquisitive, helpful, glamorous, cheerful, open, clever, innocent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.