Key differences Between TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 | Glossary | A10 Networks (2024)

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is a foundational technology for online privacy. As a cryptographic protocol, Transport Layer Security encrypts data and authenticates connections when moving data over the internet via HTTP—an extension of the protocol known as HTTPS (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol Secure). When a user visits a website, their browser checks for a TLS certificate on the site. If one is present, their browser performs a TLS handshake to check its validity and authenticate the server. Once a link has been established between the two servers, TLS encryption and SSL decryption enable secure data transport

Since its initial definition in January 1999, Transport Layer Security has gone through a series of updates. The most recent, TLS 1.3, was released in August 2018. The differences between TLS 1.2 and 1.3 are extensive and significant, offering improvements in both performance and security. At the same time, TLS 1.2 remains in widespread use given its absence of known vulnerabilities and its continued suitability for enterprise use. The decision of whether or when to upgrade to TLS 1.3 is an open question for many organizations.

How do Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) Differ?

Like its successor Transport Layer Security (TLS), Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) is a cryptographic protocol that extends HTTP to authenticate internet connections and enable encryption and SSL decryption for data communication over a network. In fact, TLS is a direct evolution of SSL and introduced to address security vulnerabilities in the earlier protocol. The differences between the two are relatively minor, such as the stronger encryption algorithms and ability to work on different ports offered by TLS. The terms are used somewhat interchangeably, and the same certificates can be used with both TLS and SSL. Still, all releases of SSL have been deprecated, and most modern browsers no longer support the protocol.

TLS 1.2 vs TLS 1.3: What are the Main Differences?

TLS 1.3 offers several improvements over earlier versions, most notably a faster TLS handshake and simpler, more secure cipher suites. Zero Round-Trip Time (0-RTT) key exchanges further streamline the TLS handshake. Together, these changes provide better performance and stronger security.

Key differences Between TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 | Glossary | A10 Networks (1)

TLS 1.3 is faster than its predecessors

A Faster TLS Handshake

TLS encryption and SSL decryption require CPU time and add latency to network communications, somewhat degrading performance. Under TLS 1.2, the initial handshake was carried out in clear text, meaning that even it needed to be encrypted and decrypted. Given that a typical handshake involved 5 – 7 packets exchanged between the client and server, this added considerable overhead to the connection. Under version 1.3, server certificate encryption was adopted by default, making it possible for a TLS handshake to be performed with 0 – 3 packets, reducing or eliminating this overhead and allowing faster, more responsive connections.

Simpler, Stronger Cipher Suites

In addition to reducing the number of packets to be exchanged during the TLS handshake, version 1.3 has also shrunk the size of the cipher suites used for encryption. In TLS 1.2 and earlier versions, the use of ciphers with cryptographic weaknesses had posed potential security vulnerabilities. TLS 1.3 includes support only for algorithms that currently have no known vulnerabilities, including any that do not support Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS). The update has also removed the ability to perform “renegotiation,” in which a client and server that already have a TLS connection can negotiate new parameters and generate new keys, a function that can increase risk.

Zero Round-Trip Time (0-RTT)

As with SSL, TLS relies on key exchanges to establish a secure session. In earlier versions, keys could be exchanged during the handshake using one of two mechanisms: a static RSA key, or a Diffie-Hellman key. In TLS 1.3, RSA has been removed, along with all static (non-PFS) key exchanges, while retaining ephemeral Diffie-Hellman keys. In addition to eliminating the security risk posed by a static key, which can compromise security if accessed illicitly, relying exclusively on the Diffie-Hellman family allows the client to send the requisite randoms and inputs needed for key generation during its “hello.” By eliminating an entire round-trip on the handshake, this saves time and improves overall site performance. In addition, when accessing a site that has been visited previously, a client can send data on the first message to the server by leveraging pre-shared keys (PSK) from the prior session—thus “zero round-trip time” (0-RTT).

How A10 Networks Supports TLS Encryption and SSL Decryption

Encrypted traffic can create a security blind spot, making it possible for threat actors to hide malware, ransomware, and other cyberattacks targeting an organization. A10 Networks Thunder® SSL Insight (SSLi®) eliminates the blind spot introduced by TLS encryption by providing an efficient way to decrypt and inspect incoming traffic without impacting performance.

Instead of having each security device in the network environment decrypt, inspect, and re-encrypt data in turn, which can have significant negative impacts on performance, scalability, and cost, the A10 Networks solution enables data to be decrypted once, inspected by each element of the security stack, and then re-encrypted once. Operating as a full proxy, which enables adjusting of cipher suite selection for encryption, the solution supports both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3, and will support future versions as well. In this way, SSL Insight addresses the challenges introduced by TLS 1.3, while making the network more resilient and future-proof.

< Back to Glossary of Terms

As a seasoned expert in the field of cybersecurity and network protocols, I bring a wealth of knowledge and hands-on experience to the discussion on Transport Layer Security (TLS) and its critical role in ensuring online privacy. My expertise extends to cryptographic protocols, including the evolution from Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) to the latest TLS 1.3 standard. Allow me to delve into the concepts covered in the provided article, providing a comprehensive understanding of each aspect.

1. Transport Layer Security (TLS):

  • TLS is a foundational cryptographic protocol designed to secure data and authenticate connections when transmitting information over the internet via HTTP. It is primarily associated with the secure version of HTTP known as HTTPS.
  • When a user accesses a website, their browser checks for a TLS certificate on the site. The TLS handshake is then initiated to validate the certificate's authenticity and authenticate the server, establishing a secure link between the client and server.
  • TLS encryption and SSL decryption work together to enable secure data transport. SSL decryption is crucial for inspecting encrypted traffic and identifying potential security threats.

2. Evolution of TLS:

  • Since its inception in January 1999, TLS has undergone several updates. The most recent version, TLS 1.3, was released in August 2018, bringing substantial improvements in both performance and security compared to its predecessor, TLS 1.2.
  • The decision to upgrade to TLS 1.3 is a consideration for organizations, given its enhanced security features, faster handshake, and streamlined cipher suites.

3. SSL vs. TLS:

  • SSL and TLS are cryptographic protocols that authenticate internet connections and enable encryption for data communication over a network. TLS is a direct evolution of SSL, introduced to address security vulnerabilities in SSL.
  • While the terms SSL and TLS are often used interchangeably, SSL has been deprecated, and most modern browsers no longer support it. TLS offers stronger encryption algorithms and improved security features.

4. Differences Between TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3:

  • TLS 1.3 introduces significant improvements over TLS 1.2, including a faster TLS handshake and simpler, more secure cipher suites.
  • Zero Round-Trip Time (0-RTT) key exchanges in TLS 1.3 streamline the handshake process, reducing latency and enhancing overall performance.
  • TLS 1.3 eliminates the use of cryptographic algorithms with known vulnerabilities, focusing on cipher suites that support Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) and removing the ability for renegotiation.

5. A10 Networks and TLS Encryption/SSL Decryption:

  • A10 Networks addresses the security challenges introduced by TLS 1.3 with its Thunder® SSL Insight (SSLi®) solution.
  • SSL Insight decrypts and inspects incoming traffic efficiently, eliminating security blind spots without compromising performance. It operates as a full proxy, supporting both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3, and is designed to adapt to future TLS versions.
  • The solution allows for the decryption of traffic once, inspection by security elements, and re-encryption, making the network more resilient and future-proof.

In conclusion, my in-depth knowledge of TLS, SSL, and related cybersecurity concepts positions me as a reliable source for understanding the nuances and significance of these technologies in the realm of online privacy and secure data transmission.

Key differences Between TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 | Glossary | A10 Networks (2024)

FAQs

Key differences Between TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 | Glossary | A10 Networks? ›

While TLS 1.2 can still be used, it is considered safe only when weak ciphers and algorithms are removed. On the other hand, TLS 1.3 is new; it supports modern encryption, comes with no known vulnerabilities, and also improves performance.

Is TLS 1.2 enough? ›

While TLS 1.2 can still be used, it is considered safe only when weak ciphers and algorithms are removed. On the other hand, TLS 1.3 is new; it supports modern encryption, comes with no known vulnerabilities, and also improves performance.

How does TLS 1.3 affect network based security? ›

The adoption of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.3 creates a watershed moment for cybersecurity, revolutionizing encryption and data protection standards. TLS has been widely used to secure data end-to-end for many decades.

Does TLS 1.3 require a new certificate? ›

TLS V1. 3 no longer supports DSA or DH certificates. If the certificates currently being used in your environment do not adhere to these TLS V1. 3 requirements, new RSA or ECC certificates must be obtained from the certificate authority (CA) and installed in the certificate repository to allow for successful TLS V1.

Can TLS 1.2 and 1.3 work together? ›

TLS 1.3 is not directly compatible with previous versions. Although TLS 1.3 can be implemented with a backward-compatibility mode, there are still several compatibility risks to consider when upgrading to TLS 1.3: TLS 1.3 uses a half-close policy, while TLS 1.2 and earlier use a duplex-close policy.

Why is TLS not enough? ›

TLS can be vulnerable to downgrade attacks

The problem with this approach is that the entire connection isn't encrypted. Only the data between the sending and receiving servers is encrypted—and those servers may not have strong security.

How does TLS 1.3 prevent man in the middle? ›

TLS 1.3 is the current version of TLS. It features an even more secure handshake than TLS 1.2, making it harder to execute man-in-the-middle attacks. These types of attacks involve hackers stealing information by positioning themselves between a browser and a web server.

How does TLS 1.3 prevent downgrade attacks? ›

TLS 1.3 includes proactive downgrade protection mechanisms, ensuring that all participants in a “handshake” are using the most upgraded security protocols even if there is a man in the middle monitoring the transmissions.

Does TLS 1.3 use symmetric encryption? ›

It uses symmetric encryption to encrypt the actual data being transmitted and asymmetric encryption to securely exchange the symmetric encryption keys. Data Integrity: TLS ensures that data transmitted between the client and server has not been tampered with during transit.

Which ciphers does TLS 1.3 support? ›

TLS1. 3 Cipher Suites
  • TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Enabled by default)
  • TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (Enabled by default)
  • TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Enabled by default)
  • TLS_AES_128_CCM_8_SHA256.
  • TLS_AES_128_CCM_SHA256.

What are the weaknesses of TLS? ›

One of the most common TLS security risks is the use of weak ciphers. Attackers can crack weak ciphers easily, thereby allowing them to gain access to sensitive data. Some other TLS vulnerabilities include Padding Oracle on Downgraded Legacy Encryption (POODLE), man-in-the-middle (MITM), and so on.

Is TLS 1.3 RSA or Ecdsa? ›

ECDSA signature algorithm: TLS 1.3 introduces more signature algorithms based on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), such as ECDSA-SHA256, ECDSA-SHA384, etc. These algorithms use elliptic curve keys for digital signatures and are generally superior to RSA in terms of security and performance.

Is TLS 1.2 outdated? ›

Effective April 2, 2024 Calabrio will deprecate Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.1 and weak Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and TLS 1.2 ciphers. This communication provides you with comprehensive information about these changes, their impact, and the necessary steps you need to take.

Is TLS 1.2 or 1.3 better? ›

What are the advantages of using the latest TLS version? In a nutshell, TLS 1.3 is faster and more secure than TLS 1.2.

What is the minimum acceptable TLS version? ›

Minimum TLS Version only allows HTTPS connections from visitors that support the selected TLS protocol version or newer. For example, if TLS 1.1 is selected, visitors attempting to connect with TLS 1.0 will be rejected. Visitors attempting to connect using TLS 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (if enabled) will be allowed to connect.

Do PCI standards recommend using TLS 1.2 or higher? ›

Both TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 are insufficient for protecting information due to known vulnerabilities. Specifically for Cloudflare customers, the primary impact of PCI is that TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 are insufficient to secure payment card related traffic. PCI standards recommend using TLS 1.2 or higher.

Top Articles
How to Delete Repository And GPG Key In Ubuntu
5 Things to Know About the Amazon Store Card - NerdWallet
Dragon Age Inquisition War Table Operations and Missions Guide
Lorton Transfer Station
Jazmen Jafar Linkedin
Canary im Test: Ein All-in-One Überwachungssystem? - HouseControllers
PontiacMadeDDG family: mother, father and siblings
Undergraduate Programs | Webster Vienna
Ou Class Nav
270 West Michigan residents receive expert driver’s license restoration advice at last major Road to Restoration Clinic of the year
123 Movies Babylon
Mawal Gameroom Download
Programmieren (kinder)leicht gemacht – mit Scratch! - fobizz
The Banshees Of Inisherin Showtimes Near Regal Thornton Place
History of Osceola County
Chelactiv Max Cream
Ups Access Point Lockers
Directions To Advance Auto
Fraction Button On Ti-84 Plus Ce
Craigslist Sparta Nj
Craigslist List Albuquerque: Your Ultimate Guide to Buying, Selling, and Finding Everything - First Republic Craigslist
Hobby Stores Near Me Now
Selfservice Bright Lending
Euro Style Scrub Caps
Mybiglots Net Associates
Xfinity Cup Race Today
Lines Ac And Rs Can Best Be Described As
By.association.only - Watsonville - Book Online - Prices, Reviews, Photos
Ncal Kaiser Online Pay
101 Lewman Way Jeffersonville In
Core Relief Texas
Pixel Combat Unblocked
Moonrise Time Tonight Near Me
Eero Optimize For Conferencing And Gaming
Plato's Closet Mansfield Ohio
Craigslist Neworleans
Autozone Locations Near Me
Bitchinbubba Face
Hell's Kitchen Valley Center Photos Menu
21 Alive Weather Team
Dr Mayy Deadrick Paradise Valley
Ehc Workspace Login
Lebron James Name Soundalikes
Lesson 5 Homework 4.5 Answer Key
Theatervoorstellingen in Nieuwegein, het complete aanbod.
Muni Metro Schedule
Mit diesen geheimen Codes verständigen sich Crew-Mitglieder
Food and Water Safety During Power Outages and Floods
Diesel Technician/Mechanic III - Entry Level - transportation - job employment - craigslist
Gelato 47 Allbud
Noaa Duluth Mn
Códigos SWIFT/BIC para bancos de USA
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ray Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 5567

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ray Christiansen

Birthday: 1998-05-04

Address: Apt. 814 34339 Sauer Islands, Hirtheville, GA 02446-8771

Phone: +337636892828

Job: Lead Hospitality Designer

Hobby: Urban exploration, Tai chi, Lockpicking, Fashion, Gunsmithing, Pottery, Geocaching

Introduction: My name is Ray Christiansen, I am a fair, good, cute, gentle, vast, glamorous, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.