How can you improve your estimate accuracy? (2024)

There are different methods to estimate the duration and effort of a project or task, such as bottom-up, top-down, parametric, or analogous. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the level of detail, complexity, and uncertainty of the work. You should choose the method that best suits your project characteristics, goals, and constraints. For example, if you have a well-defined scope and a similar previous project, you can use the analogous method to base your estimate on the past performance. If you have a high-level scope and a tight deadline, you can use the top-down method to allocate a fixed amount of time and resources to each phase or deliverable.

One of the most common causes of inaccurate estimates is the lack of clarity and granularity of the work. If you try to estimate a large or vague task, you are more likely to overlook some aspects or make unrealistic assumptions. To avoid this, you should break down your work into smaller, manageable, and measurable pieces. You can use a work breakdown structure (WBS) to decompose your project into its components and subcomponents, and then estimate each piece individually. This way, you can increase the accuracy and reliability of your estimates, as well as identify the dependencies and critical paths of your project.

Another way to improve your estimate accuracy is to use historical data and expert opinions as references. Historical data refers to the actual time and effort spent on similar or comparable projects or tasks in the past. You can use historical data to benchmark your estimates and adjust them for any differences or changes in scope, quality, or resources. Expert opinions refer to the input or feedback from people who have relevant knowledge or experience in the field or domain of your project or task. You can use expert opinions to validate your estimates and incorporate their insights or suggestions. However, you should also be aware of the potential biases or errors that may affect historical data or expert opinions, such as optimism, anchoring, or overconfidence.

Estimates are not exact numbers, but rather ranges or probabilities that reflect the uncertainty and risk of the work. Uncertainty refers to the variability or unpredictability of the factors that influence the work, such as requirements, specifications, or quality standards. Risk refers to the possibility or impact of negative events or outcomes that may affect the work, such as delays, errors, or defects. You should adjust your estimates for uncertainty and risk by adding some contingency or buffer time and resources to your baseline estimates. You can use different techniques to quantify and account for uncertainty and risk, such as Monte Carlo simulation, PERT analysis, or risk register.

Finally, you should track and review your estimates regularly throughout the project or task lifecycle. Tracking your estimates means comparing your planned or expected time and effort with your actual or realized time and effort, and identifying any deviations or variances. Reviewing your estimates means analyzing the causes and effects of the deviations or variances, and learning from your mistakes or successes. You should track and review your estimates using some tools or metrics, such as Gantt charts, earned value analysis, or variance analysis. By tracking and reviewing your estimates, you can monitor your project or task performance, control your scope, time, and cost, and improve your estimate accuracy for future projects or tasks.

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Planning

+ Follow

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.