Skip to main contentSkip to footer
Why is Christian Science in our name?
Why is Christian Science in our name?
Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.
The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.
Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
Explore values journalismAbout us
Log inLog out
Log inSubscribeGive a gift
of stories this month>Get unlimited stories
Your subscription makes our work possible.
We want to bridge divides to reach everyone.
Subscribe
Deepen your worldview
with Monitor Highlights.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
';});newsletterBanner.setAttribute('sub-event','true');}});}if ( window.location.href.indexOf('kwc2c') > -1 ){let allNewslettersBanners = document.querySelectorAll(".newsletter-banner");allNewslettersBanners.remove();}document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () =>{removeMultipleListings();addFormEventListener();try{let salesforce_id = _satellite.getVar('Query String - SFMC Subscriber ID');if ( salesforce_id ){let pagePath = csmJs.pageData.sections;if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Books' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'books' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Politics' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'politics' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Education' ) > -1 ||pagePath.indexOf( 'The Culture' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'culture-learning' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Science' ) > -1 ||pagePath.indexOf( 'Environment' ) > -1 ||pagePath.indexOf( 'Technology' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'science' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'A Christian Science Perspective' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'csperspective' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Commentary' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'commentary' );}else{csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'highlights' );}}}catch ( error ){console.warn( error );}}, false);
In a Word
Thesolicitorgeneral reports to the attorneygeneral, who heads the Department of Justice. The president’s lawyer is the White House counsel. Why?
|
Staff
Loading...
By Melissa MohrContributor
English has lots of words for members of the legal profession. The head of the U.S. Justice Department is the attorney general, and the solicitor general reports to him or her. The president’s lawyer is called the White House counsel, while those who argue cases before the Supreme Court are advocates. All sorts of lawyers can identify themselves as esquires. According to the American Bar Association, there are 1.3 million lawyers in the United States. That’s more than the number of mechanical engineers, firefighters, and garbage collectors combined. Could this bounty of litigators be why English has so many different words for lawyer?
No, but lawyer jokes have been around since the plays of Aristophanes, circa 400 B.C. We have so many terms for them because of the convoluted development of the English and American court systems.
Lawyer has been the general, catchall term for “a member of the legal profession” since the 14th century. Though it looks a bit odd, it’s simply a form of the regular -er and -ier suffixes that make “employment nouns,” as in farmer and cashier.
Today, the British legal system divides lawyers into two groups, solicitors and barristers. In the U.S., solicit and its derivatives have become disreputable. While it’s still possible innocently to “solicit donations,” the verb is tainted by an association with prostitution, and the noun is rarely used except on door signs that warn “No solicitors,” e.g., no one may knock to sell a product or tout a candidate.
In Britain, solicitors (first used in the 16th century) originally worked only in a particular branch of the legal system, the courts of equity; today they are lawyers who advise clients and arrange settlements “behind the scenes” but don’t argue cases in court.
If you have seen pictures of men and women in black robes with white wigs perched precariously over their real hair, those are barristers. Barristers are basically lawyers who take cases to trial, and the only kind authorized to work in Britain’s High Courts. The word originated in the organization of medieval law schools, which had a physical bar that separated novice students from lecturers and more advanced students. When a budding lawyer was deemed proficient enough, he was “called to the bar” – he was allowed to sit on the outside of it while he argued a case – and thus became a “barrister.” By the 16th century, “the bar” had become a metonym (a term that substitutes for a related one) for the entire legal profession. This is why lawyers in the U.S. must pass the bar exam, and why when dishonest attorneys lose their license they are disbarred.
You've readoffree articles.Subscribe to continue.
Help fund Monitor journalism for $11/ month
Already a subscriber? Login
Mark Sappenfield
Editor
Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.
Our work isn't possible without your support.
Subscribe
Unlimited digital access $11/month.
Already a subscriber? Login
Digital subscription includes:
- Unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.
- CSMonitor.com archive.
- The Monitor Daily email.
- No advertising.
- Cancel anytime.
Subscribe
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
Mark Sappenfield, Editor
Subscribe
Related stories
In a WordMonkeys in sleeves and other delightful idioms
In a WordHow did ‘Juneteenth’ get its name?
In a WordSorting out the changing meaning of ‘grooming’
Mark Sappenfield
Editor
Dear Reader,
About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:
“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”
If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.
But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.
The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.
We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”
If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.
Subscribe to insightful journalism
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/In-a-Word/2022/0620/Why-does-English-have-so-many-words-for-lawyer
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
Deepen your worldview
with Monitor Highlights.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
';});newsletterBanner.setAttribute('sub-event','true');}});}if ( window.location.href.indexOf('kwc2c') > -1 ){let allNewslettersBanners = document.querySelectorAll(".newsletter-banner");allNewslettersBanners.remove();}document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () =>{removeMultipleListings();addFormEventListener();try{let salesforce_id = _satellite.getVar('Query String - SFMC Subscriber ID');if ( salesforce_id ){let pagePath = csmJs.pageData.sections;if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Books' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'books' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Politics' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'politics' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Education' ) > -1 ||pagePath.indexOf( 'The Culture' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'culture-learning' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Science' ) > -1 ||pagePath.indexOf( 'Environment' ) > -1 ||pagePath.indexOf( 'Technology' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'science' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'A Christian Science Perspective' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'csperspective' );}else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Commentary' ) > -1 ){csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'commentary' );}else{csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'highlights' );}}}catch ( error ){console.warn( error );}}, false);
Subscription expired
Your subscription toThe Christian Science Monitor has expired.Youcan renew your subscription orcontinue to use the site without asubscription.
If you have questions about your account, pleasecontact customer serviceor call us at 1-617-450-2300.
This message will appear once per weekunless you renew orlog out.
Session expired
Your session to The ChristianScience Monitor has expired. Welogged you out.
Log in again
If you have questions about your account, pleasecontact customer serviceor call us at 1-617-450-2300.
No subscription
You don’t have a Christian Science Monitorsubscription yet.
Subscribe now
If you have questions about your account, pleasecontact customer serviceor call us at 1-617-450-2300.