With Crypto platforms like Celsius, Voyager failing one by one, and the second largest crypto exchange, FTX filing for bankruptcy protection after suspending account withdrawals. Investors are scrambling to protect their crypto assets. Sequoia Capital immediately wrote off its investment in FTX to zero. Is nothing really recoverable? What is the chance of investors getting some money back if a crypto exchange goes bust?
What happens if Crypto Wallet goes Bankrupt?
Most crypto exchanges, including the ones in trouble - Celsius, Voyager and FTX, operate hot wallets on a custodial basis. That means that the investors give the exchanges custody of their cryptos in return for a mere debit entry on their wallets. If the crypto wallet / exchange goes bankrupt, the investors will rank last as unsecured creditors, which means that they will likely get nothing at the end of the bankruptcy.
It is safer to store cryptos in non-custodial cold wallets, but they are much harder to operate and trade. They are good for long term investors who are in cryptocurrencies for the long haul and will not trade them day in day out. Read on to see how investors can protect themselves from crypto bankruptcies.
As a creditor, the crypto platform may have poor record keeping and it is prudent to issue a statutory demand to the platform if it is filing for bankruptcy. Please see:
https://docpro.com/blog80/all-you-need-to-know-about-statutory-demand .
What is a Cryptocurrency?
Cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency secured by cryptography, making it nearly impossible to counterfeit or double-spend. Each coin is fungible - i.e. it has the same value as any other coin of the same type at any given moment, as known as fungible. Bitcoin and Ethereum are prime examples.
NFTs or Non-fungible tokens, on the other hand, are non-fungible. They are unique tokens that represent intellectual property rights and have different values.
To sell or purchase cryptocurrencies, most investors will use an exchange platform and wallet. Like securities brokers, most investors find it easier to give custody of their cryptos to the exchange and they can trade in and out of the cryptocurrencies with ease. Otherwise investors will need to deposit their cryptocurrencies every time they sell and withdraw every time they buy. This is very time consuming and incur additional transaction costs. It may also mean that investors, especially short term investors, may miss the perfect buying / selling opportunities.
What Rights do Investors get with Cryptocurrencies?
Cryptocurrencies investors, unlike NFTs investors, generally do not get any of the underlying intellectual property rights (copyright, patent and trademark) of the cryptocurrencies. Investors will get the value of interchangeable tokens which can be transferred to lend out. There are two main ways to own crypto:
- Through a Crypto exchange / hot Crypto wallet: Active crypto investors mostly use large exchanges, such as Binance and Coinbase. They give custody of their crypto assets to the exchange, and the buyers and sellers of the cryptocurrencies would get matched within the exchange. The user experience is similar to a bank / brokerage firm but without regulatory protections.
- Through a private cold Crypto wallet: Long term crypto investors prefer to hold digital currency in their own wallets. It’s considered the safest and most private way to store crypto.
The rights of investors are generally under contractual terms of the cryptocurrencies, exchanges and wallets. If the investor is in a non-custodial wallet, then the investor holds all of the rights associated with the cryptocurrencies. If the investor is using a custodial wallet, then the terms and conditions of the wallet site determine who owns the rights. In some cases, it is a mixture of the two.
Do I Need a Crypto Wallet?
Crypto investors generally need to have wallets for the storage of cryptocurrencies. Investors can choose to hold cryptos in a hot wallet or in a cold wallet, or even a combination of the two. Investors will need to balance between security (cold non-custodial storage) and convenience (hot custodial storage) to keep their cryptocurrencies safe and allow them to trade with ease at the same time.
What's the Best Crypto Wallet?
With the world’s second largest crypto exchange, FTX, facing a liquidity crisis, there does not seem to be any platform that is completely safe. Investors will need to understand more about the wallets and store their cryptos to protect their investments. Investors will need to balance between safety and convenience when deciding what is the best crypto wallet for them.
Most crypto exchanges offer their users custodial hot wallets. A hot wallet is an app or a platform connected to the internet for storage. The private keys of cryptos are owned by the platform or software. Investors do not have to spend extra money on purchasing devices, lowering the investment threshold. This is the most low-cost and convenient way to own and trade cryptocurrencies, yet the custody of the cryptocurrencies is given to the exchanges. This means that the crypto assets are co-mingled with the assets of the exchange and the investors will rank last as unsecured creditors in case of bankruptcy.
The safest way to keep crypto is through a non-custodial cold wallet. It is offline storage, which is usually stored through a physical device. This also means that the custody of the crypto assets lies with the investors and is segregated from the risk of the exchange.
The greatest risk of cold storage lies not with the investors themselves - they may lose their private keys and thus be unable to recover their crypto assets. We have all heard of the infamous story of an engineer throwing away a hard disk with US$200 million worth of bitcoins. In addition, if the owner of the crypto assets pass away, the beneficiaries may not know about them unless they are properly recorded in the will.
Hot Wallet vs. Cold Wallet
The greatest advantage of a hot wallet is its ease of use without constantly switching online and offline for transactions,. This is perfect for day traders, who can transact instantaneously at low costs, unrestricted by time and space.
The main risks associated with the use of a hot wallet are:
(i) Hacking Risk
Most hot wallets use decentralized finance (DeFi) programs, which are blockchain technology that use open-source code to enable financial transactions. Because they are public, anyone can view them to find vulnerabilities and hackers may exploit them to steal funds from users or the exchange. There seems to be an endless list of platforms and bridges that have been hacked - Coinbase, FTX, Solana, Nomad, Wormhole, Binance …. the list goes on, with cryptocurrencies have been stolen from wallets on these platforms.
(ii) Bankruptcy Risk
FTX is the biggest bombshell after the bankruptcy of Voyager and Celcius. This could be the Lehman moment of cryptos that may lead to the collapse of other crypto platforms. These platforms have stopped users from withdrawing both cash and cryptos. Most of these platforms use hot wallets which means that investors give custody of their cryptocurrencies to the platforms which are co-mingled with the other assets. In addition, these are unregulated financial institutions and any cash held with them will not be treated as deposits. As a result, investors are unsecured creditors and will rank last in bankruptcy proceedings. The most likely outcome in the event of bankruptcy of an exchange is that investors will get nothing at the end.
A cold wallet can help to minimize the above risks. It is similar to a physical wallet / safe in real life accessible through private keys. As investors have 100% control over the wallet, which is segregated offline from the exchange, both credit risk and risk of data breach are low. However, if the physical device is destroyed or lost, the users will not be able to access their assets’ private keys. Thus it is important for investors to store the cold wallet private keys in a secured location such as a safe deposit box.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Hot Wallet vs. Cold Wallet:
Hot Wallet (Custodial Wallet) | Cold Wallet (Non-custodial Wallet) | |
Custody Risk | You give custody of your crypto assets to the exchange, subject to the risk of bankruptcy of the exchange. | You have 100% control over your crypto with your private keys and wallet is decentralized. |
Hacking Risk | Online storage under open source, vulnerable to hacking, stealing of wallet and data breach. | Offline storage and does not require to provide identity. Risk of hacking and data breach is lower. |
Storage | No major effect if you lose your private keys, easy to regain access again via the platform. | If you or your beneficiaries lose your private keys, you will not be able to access your wallet and crypto. |
Fees | Low fees for trading or crypto transfers are made within the exchange / platform ecosystem. | You need to pay a transaction fee as the transactions are on-chain and need to transfer from offline to exchange. |
Ease of Trading | You can trade cryptos in and out with ease under normal market conditions. | You cannot trade immediately since you have to wait for the deposit of cryptos and transaction to be confirmed. |
Identity and KYC | Most exchanges will require proof of identity and perform KYC (know your customer) and money laundering checks. | Can be kept anonymous with the holder of private keys holding the crypto assets. Cannot be traced if stolen. |
Examples | Binance Chain Wallet Coinbase Gemini Crypto.com App MetaMask Electrum Edge Wallet Trust Wallet Exodus Robinhood Mycelium iToken Blockchain Wallet AtomicDEX | Ledger Nano Trezor CoolWallet Crypto.com Wallet Atomic Wallet Keepkey SafePal S1 Armory Wallet Generator Coldcard Bitbox |
Are Crypto exchanges regulated? Are investments protected by the government?
Although most crypto exchanges operate like a bank or a brokerage firm, taking investors’ deposits and lending them out, allowing investors to buy and sell cryptocurrencies, or speculate on decentralized finance products to get high yields. They are not regulated, meaning investors do not get the same protections they would get with deposits held in a bank or securities in a brokerage firm.
In the US, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation protects bank depositors of up to US$250,000 if a bank fails and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation protects investors of up to $500,000 in cash and securities if a broker becomes insolvent. Many jurisdictions around the offer similar protections to investors. Unfortunately, these protections are not offered to crypto investors.
Regulators have not really figured out the best way to regulate crypto trading. cryptocurrencies are generally regarded as being akin to currencies, thus like most FX transactions, they are generally not regulated. However, regulators from around the world are looking at regulating tokens as securities after the recent failures in the crypto industry. So watch this space on how cryptos will be regulated in the future.
Conclusion
Given there are both advantages and disadvantages of storing cryptocurrencies in hot wallets vs cold wallets, investors will need to weigh the risk and safety of their investments vs the ease of trading to decide which wallet is most suitable for them. In general, hot wallets are more suitable for short-term traders whereas cold wallets are safer for longer-term investors who plan to buy and hold crypto assets.
Related Document Template:
Download DocPro's template for Statutory Demand: A Statutory Demand is a formal written demand for payment of debt. Creditors should issue a statutory demand to the crypto platformif it is filing for bankruptcy.
Please note that the information contained in this article does not constitute legal advice. As the laws of each jurisdiction may be different, you may want to speak to your lawyer.
As a seasoned expert in the field of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, I have closely followed the developments in the crypto space, including the rise and fall of various platforms. My extensive knowledge is derived from both theoretical understanding and practical experience in the cryptocurrency market.
The recent incidents involving crypto platforms like Celsius, Voyager, and FTX filing for bankruptcy protection have sent shockwaves through the investment community. Sequoia Capital's decision to write off its investment in FTX underscores the severity of the situation. I am well aware that such events raise critical questions about the recoverability of investors' assets and the overall safety of crypto investments.
The article delves into the risks associated with custodial hot wallets, as exemplified by platforms like Celsius, Voyager, and FTX. The fundamental concept here is that investors using these platforms essentially relinquish custody of their cryptocurrencies, becoming unsecured creditors in the event of a platform's bankruptcy. This means that they are likely to receive nothing during the bankruptcy proceedings.
Furthermore, the distinction between hot wallets and cold wallets is crucial for investors seeking to safeguard their assets. The article rightly emphasizes the security advantages of non-custodial cold wallets, which involve offline storage and provide investors with 100% control over their crypto assets. The risks associated with cold wallets, such as the potential loss of private keys, are also highlighted.
The discussion extends to the rights of cryptocurrency investors, emphasizing the contractual terms associated with cryptocurrencies, exchanges, and wallets. The contrast between custodial and non-custodial wallets in terms of rights ownership is clearly outlined, providing investors with valuable insights into the implications of their chosen storage method.
The article goes beyond wallet types to explore the broader landscape of cryptocurrency investments, addressing the rights of investors, the necessity of crypto wallets, and the challenges associated with hot wallets, particularly in terms of hacking and bankruptcy risks. The Lehman moment analogy regarding FTX adds a layer of gravity to the discussion.
In addition, the article sheds light on the regulatory landscape for crypto exchanges, highlighting the lack of government protections for crypto investors compared to traditional banking and brokerage scenarios. The evolving nature of crypto regulations globally is acknowledged, indicating that regulators are grappling with the best approaches to oversee this rapidly changing industry.
To assist creditors in such situations, the article recommends the issuance of statutory demands to crypto platforms filing for bankruptcy. It directs readers to a comprehensive resource on statutory demands, underlining the importance of legal considerations in navigating the complexities of crypto bankruptcies.
In conclusion, the article provides a thorough exploration of the challenges and considerations surrounding crypto investments, offering valuable insights for investors looking to protect their assets in an increasingly volatile market.
