We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and Radeon RX 570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks. GTX 1060 6 GB 2016 6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt 26.58 +47.2% RX 570 2017 8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt 18.06 GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 580 Arc A580 RX 5700 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms RX 570 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results. GTX 1060 6 GB RX 570 GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. RX 570 has 2% better value for money than GTX 1060 6 GB. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1060 6 GB26.58 +47.2% RX 57018.06 This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. GTX 1060 6 GB10252 +47.2% RX 5706967 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displayinga space fleet attack ona defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. GTX 1060 6 GB55893 +22.7% RX 57045560 3DMark 11is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11is now superseded by Time Spy. GTX 1060 6 GB17401 RX 57018967 +9% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. GTX 1060 6 GB12984 RX 57013827 +6.5% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displaysa few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just likeIce Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. GTX 1060 6 GB77035 +8.4% RX 57071096 Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. GTX 1060 6 GB437988 +16.8% RX 570375145 Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +5.9% −5.9% +4.3% −4.3% +10.7% −10.7% Full HD +57.1% −57.1% Full HD +16.1% −16.1% +50% −50% −19.1% +19.1% −3% +3% +57.1% −57.1% +3.8% −3.8% −3.7% +3.7% +8.6% −8.6% +54.3% −54.3% +36% −36% −9.8% +9.8% +104% −104% +12.5% −12.5% +24.4% −24.4% Full HD −1.1% +1.1% +50% −50% −25.6% +25.6% −5% +5% +57.1% −57.1% −7.8% +7.8% +4.9% −4.9% +2% −2% +54.3% −54.3% +36% −36% −5.1% +5.1% +40.8% −40.8% +54.2% −54.2% +346% −346% +24.4% −24.4% Full HD +15.2% −15.2% +50% −50% −4.7% +4.7% +57.1% −57.1% +8.7% −8.7% −2.7% +2.7% +54.3% −54.3% +36% −36% +54.2% −54.2% +2.3% −2.3% +24.4% −24.4% Full HD +40.8% −40.8% 1440p −27.1% +27.1% +4.9% −4.9% 1440p +10.3% −10.3% +62.5% −62.5% −20% +20% +70% −70% +3.3% −3.3% +31.5% −31.5% +52.4% −52.4% +48.6% −48.6% +4.2% −4.2% +68.6% −68.6% +65% −65% +37% −37% 1440p +53.3% −53.3% 4K −25% +25% +4.8% −4.8% +61.5% −61.5% +45.2% −45.2% −16% +16% +3.6% −3.6% 4K +5.9% −5.9% +66.7% −66.7% −42.9% +42.9% +133% −133% +0% +0% −2.6% +2.6% +73.7% −73.7% +71.4% −71.4% 4K +37.5% −37.5% This is how GTX 1060 6 GB and RX 570 compete in popular games: Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games: All in all, in popular games: GTX 1060 6 GB has a 47.2% higher aggregate performance score. RX 570, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 570 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Radeon RX 570 Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 4.212779 votes Rate GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5: 4.17707 votes Rate Radeon RX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 203 303 Place by popularity 9 25 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 17.08 17.46 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Polaris (2016−2019) GPU code name GP106 Polaris 20 Ellesmere Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 19 July 2016 (8 years ago) 18 April 2017 (7 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $299 $169 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 2048 Core clock speed 1506 MHz 1168 MHz Boost clock speed 1708 MHz 1244 MHz Number of transistors 4,400 million 5,700 million Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 120 Watt Texture fill rate 136.7 159.2 Floating-point performance 4.375 gflops 5.095 gflops Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 250 mm 241 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5 Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB Memory bus width 192 Bit 256 Bit Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 7000 MHz Memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s 224.0 GB/s Shared memory - - Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort HDMI + + G-SYNC support + - Supported technologies
FreeSync - + VR Ready + no data API compatibility
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_0) Shader Model 6.4 6.4 OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 1.2 2.0 Vulkan 1.2.131 + CUDA 6.1 - Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Gaming performance
Average FPS across all PC games
Full HD 90 85 1440p 49 47 4K 31 28 FPS performance in popular games
Low PresetCyberpunk 2077 40−45 27−30
Medium PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 72 62 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 30−33 Battlefield 5 89 106 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66 68 Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 27−30 Far Cry 5 83 80 Far Cry New Dawn 82 85 Forza Horizon 4 279 257 Hitman 3 50−55 35−40 Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 85−90 Metro Exodus 92 101 Red Dead Redemption 2 100 45−50 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135 120 Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110 85−90
High PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 93 94 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 30−33 Battlefield 5 78 98 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60 63 Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 27−30 Far Cry 5 64 69 Far Cry New Dawn 64 61 Forza Horizon 4 260 255 Hitman 3 50−55 35−40 Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 85−90 Metro Exodus 78 82 Red Dead Redemption 2 69 45−50 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95 55−60 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 183 40−45 Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110 85−90
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 38 33 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 30−33 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 43 45 Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 27−30 Far Cry 5 50 46 Forza Horizon 4 73 75 Hitman 3 50−55 35−40 Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 85−90 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95 55−60 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 43 Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110 85−90
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 69 45−50
High PresetBattlefield 5 48 61 Far Cry New Dawn 43 41
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 32 29 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 16−18 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30 36 Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 10−11 Far Cry 5 31 30 Forza Horizon 4 196 149 Hitman 3 30−35 21−24 Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60 35−40 Metro Exodus 50 48 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 35−40 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 20−22 Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150 100−110
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 46 30−33
High PresetBattlefield 5 24 30 Far Cry New Dawn 22 21 Hitman 3 21−24 12−14 Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 90−95 Metro Exodus 25 29 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 28
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 18 17 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 9−10 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14 20 Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 3−4 Far Cry 5 15 15 Forza Horizon 4 38 39 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 18−20 Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14 7−8
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 22 16−18 Pros & cons summary
Performance score 26.58 18.06 Recency 19 July 2016 18 April 2017 Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm Vote for your favorite
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
Questions & comments
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsGeForce GTX1650 SUPER
Radeon RX570 vsRadeon R9290X
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsGeForce GTX970
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsRadeon RX560
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsRadeon RX550
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsGeForce GTX1080 11Gbps
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsRadeon530
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsRadeon RX580
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsRadeon RX470D
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsRadeon R5430 OEM
GeForce GTX1060 6 GB vsRadeon R7430 OEM