We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2080, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks. RTX 2080 Ti 2018 11 GB GDDR6, 270 Watt 56.40 +15.7% RTX 2080 2018 8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt 48.74 GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 580 Arc A580 RX 5700 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX RTX 2080 Ti outperforms RTX 2080 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results. RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. RTX 2080 has 24% better value for money than RTX 2080 Ti. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. RTX 2080 Ti56.40 +15.7% RTX 208048.74 This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. RTX 2080 Ti21758 +15.7% RTX 208018803 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displayinga space fleet attack ona defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. RTX 2080 Ti83556 +25.4% RTX 208066631 3DMark 11is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11is now superseded by Time Spy. RTX 2080 Ti47166 +17.1% RTX 208040278 Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. RTX 2080 Ti20210 +13.5% RTX 208017810 Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displaysa few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just likeIce Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. RTX 2080 Ti165122 +15% RTX 2080143576 Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesOpenCLAPI by Khronos Group. RTX 2080 Ti137136 +31.9% RTX 2080104006 Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. RTX 2080 Ti521458 +19.6% RTX 2080436117 Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesVulkanAPI by AMD & Khronos Group. RTX 2080 Ti130888 +28.1% RTX 2080102142 Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesCUDAAPI by NVIDIA. RTX 2080 Ti165093 +38.3% RTX 2080119410 RTX 2080 Ti181 +20.9% RTX 2080150 RTX 2080 Ti79 +13.6% RTX 208070 RTX 2080 Ti121 +11.2% RTX 2080109 RTX 2080 Ti63 +21% RTX 208052 RTX 2080 Ti51 +13.3% RTX 208045 RTX 2080 Ti17 +33.6% RTX 208013 This part ofSPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes. RTX 2080 Ti181 +20.9% RTX 2080150 RTX 2080 Ti121 +11.2% RTX 2080109 RTX 2080 Ti79 +13.6% RTX 208070 RTX 2080 Ti12 +4.2% RTX 208012 RTX 2080 Ti63 +21% RTX 208052 RTX 2080 Ti51 +13.3% RTX 208045 RTX 2080 Ti16.7 +33.6% RTX 208012.5 RTX 2080 Ti272 +32.5% RTX 2080205 This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulateswork with 3DSMax, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, includingarchitectural modeling and animation for computer games. RTX 2080 Ti272 +32.5% RTX 2080205 Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +14.4% −14.4% +17.8% −17.8% +28.6% −28.6% Full HD +19.1% −19.1% Full HD +19% −19% +9.2% −9.2% +25.8% −25.8% −23.4% +23.4% +19.1% −19.1% +28.3% −28.3% +19.4% −19.4% +32.1% −32.1% +19.3% −19.3% +8.4% −8.4% +0% +0% −2.8% +2.8% +0.5% −0.5% +5.1% −5.1% Full HD +18.3% −18.3% +9.6% −9.6% +23.1% −23.1% −9.3% +9.3% +19.1% −19.1% +29.4% −29.4% +20.6% −20.6% +32.1% −32.1% +19.1% −19.1% +5.1% −5.1% +0% +0% −3.5% +3.5% +20.3% −20.3% +15.8% −15.8% +4.9% −4.9% Full HD +20.6% −20.6% +9.6% −9.6% +14.4% −14.4% +19.1% −19.1% +12.3% −12.3% +27.3% −27.3% +20.9% −20.9% +19.5% −19.5% +20.3% −20.3% +27.4% −27.4% +13.9% −13.9% Full HD +5.1% −5.1% 1440p +35% −35% +27.3% −27.3% 1440p +24.1% −24.1% +11.7% −11.7% +18.8% −18.8% +25.6% −25.6% +20% −20% +47.6% −47.6% +25% −25% +25.6% −25.6% +10.1% −10.1% +20.2% −20.2% +22.1% −22.1% +5% −5% 1440p +10.5% −10.5% 4K +31.8% −31.8% +32% −32% +22.9% −22.9% +11.1% −11.1% +35.4% −35.4% +28.9% −28.9% 4K +22% −22% +21.1% −21.1% +36.8% −36.8% +31.6% −31.6% +28.2% −28.2% +32.1% −32.1% +20% −20% +25.7% −25.7% 4K +23.7% −23.7% This is how RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 2080 compete in popular games: Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games: All in all, in popular games: RTX 2080 Ti has a 15.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 37.5% higher maximum VRAM amount. RTX 2080, on the other hand, has 25.6% lower power consumption. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 44046 votes Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.92107 votes Rate GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 45 65 Place by popularity not in top-100 not in top-100 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 22.84 28.22 Architecture Turing (2018−2022) Turing (2018−2022) GPU code name Turing TU102 Turing TU104 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 27 August 2018 (6 years ago) 27 August 2018 (6 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $999 $699 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 4352 2944 Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1515 MHz Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1710 MHz Number of transistors 18,600 million 13,600 million Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 215 Watt Texture fill rate 420.2 314.6 Floating-point performance 13.45 gflops 10.07 gflops Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 267 mm 267 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 8 GB Memory bus width 352 Bit 256 Bit Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 14000 MHz Memory bandwidth 616.0 GB/s 448.0 GB/s Shared memory - - Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C HDMI + + G-SYNC support + + Supported technologies
VR Ready + + API compatibility
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_1) Shader Model 6.5 6.5 OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 2.0 1.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131 CUDA 7.5 7.5 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
GeekBench 5 CUDA
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
Gaming performance
Average FPS across all PC games
Full HD 167 146 1440p 119 101 4K 90 70 FPS performance in popular games
Low PresetCyberpunk 2077 100−110 85−90
Medium PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 125 105 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107 98 Battlefield 5 244 194 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 132 Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 85−90 Far Cry 5 163 127 Far Cry New Dawn 197 165 Forza Horizon 4 346 262 Hitman 3 161 135 Horizon Zero Dawn 285 263 Metro Exodus 144 144 Red Dead Redemption 2 106 109 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 216 215 Watch Dogs: Legion 266 253
High PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 181 153 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91 83 Battlefield 5 224 182 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 117 Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 85−90 Far Cry 5 132 102 Far Cry New Dawn 152 126 Forza Horizon 4 321 243 Hitman 3 156 131 Horizon Zero Dawn 267 254 Metro Exodus 144 144 Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 117 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230 180−190 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 100−110 Watch Dogs: Legion 255 243
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 82 68 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80 73 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 103 90 Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 85−90 Far Cry 5 91 81 Forza Horizon 4 168 132 Hitman 3 139 115 Horizon Zero Dawn 202 169 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230 180−190 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135 106 Watch Dogs: Legion 90 79
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 104 99
High PresetBattlefield 5 166 123 Far Cry New Dawn 112 88
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 72 58 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67 60 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82 69 Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 40−45 Far Cry 5 84 70 Forza Horizon 4 313 212 Hitman 3 100 80 Horizon Zero Dawn 162 129 Metro Exodus 98 89 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150 120−130 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95 75−80 Watch Dogs: Legion 251 239
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 105 95
High PresetBattlefield 5 87 66 Far Cry New Dawn 66 50 Hitman 3 59 48 Horizon Zero Dawn 130 117 Metro Exodus 111 82 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 76
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 50 41 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 46 38 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52 38 Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 18−20 Far Cry 5 50 39 Forza Horizon 4 107 81 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85 70−75 Watch Dogs: Legion 44 35
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 73 59 Pros & cons summary
Performance score 56.40 48.74 Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 8 GB Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 215 Watt Vote for your favorite
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
Questions & comments
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsRadeon RX6800
GeForce RTX2080 vsTITANRTX
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsRadeon RX7700 XT
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsGeForce RTX2070
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsGeForce RTX2060
Radeon HD8370D IGP vsGeForce RTXTITAN Ada
Radeon R5A255 vsRadeonInstinct MI250
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsTITANRTX
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsQuadro K6000SDI
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsQuadro RTX6000
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsQuadro RTX8000