We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks. GTX 1080 Ti 2017 11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt 48.12 RTX 2080 Ti 2018 11 GB GDDR6, 270 Watt 56.41 +17.2% GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 580 Arc A580 RX 5700 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX RTX 2080 Ti outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results. GTX 1080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. RTX 2080 Ti has 4% better value for money than GTX 1080 Ti. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1080 Ti48.12 RTX 2080 Ti56.41 +17.2% This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. GTX 1080 Ti18563 RTX 2080 Ti21759 +17.2% 3DMark 11is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11is now superseded by Time Spy. GTX 1080 Ti37672 RTX 2080 Ti47166 +25.2% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. GTX 1080 Ti27564 +36.4% RTX 2080 Ti20210 Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displaysa few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just likeIce Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. GTX 1080 Ti142490 RTX 2080 Ti165122 +15.9% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesOpenCLAPI by Khronos Group. GTX 1080 Ti67360 RTX 2080 Ti137136 +104% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. GTX 1080 Ti394694 RTX 2080 Ti521458 +32.1% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesVulkanAPI by AMD & Khronos Group. GTX 1080 Ti85698 RTX 2080 Ti130888 +52.7% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesCUDAAPI by NVIDIA. GTX 1080 Ti55161 RTX 2080 Ti165093 +199% GTX 1080 Ti175 RTX 2080 Ti181 +3.6% GTX 1080 Ti68 RTX 2080 Ti79 +17.5% GTX 1080 Ti10 RTX 2080 Ti12 +24% GTX 1080 Ti105 RTX 2080 Ti121 +15% GTX 1080 Ti60 RTX 2080 Ti63 +5.3% GTX 1080 Ti58 +14.1% RTX 2080 Ti51 GTX 1080 Ti149 RTX 2080 Ti179 +20.1% GTX 1080 Ti149 RTX 2080 Ti179 +20.1% This part ofSPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes. GTX 1080 Ti175 RTX 2080 Ti181 +3.6% GTX 1080 Ti105 RTX 2080 Ti121 +15% GTX 1080 Ti68 RTX 2080 Ti79 +17.5% GTX 1080 Ti10 RTX 2080 Ti12 +24% GTX 1080 Ti60 RTX 2080 Ti63 +5.3% GTX 1080 Ti58 +14.1% RTX 2080 Ti51 GTX 1080 Ti148 RTX 2080 Ti272 +84% This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulateswork with 3DSMax, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, includingarchitectural modeling and animation for computer games. GTX 1080 Ti148 RTX 2080 Ti272 +84% Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: −27.5% +27.5% −41.7% +41.7% −34.3% +34.3% Full HD −20.5% +20.5% Full HD −25% +25% −28.9% +28.9% −50.6% +50.6% −12.6% +12.6% −20.5% +20.5% −33.6% +33.6% −68.4% +68.4% −18.1% +18.1% −57.8% +57.8% −49.2% +49.2% +0% +0% −1.9% +1.9% −0.5% +0.5% −91.4% +91.4% Full HD −24.8% +24.8% −9.6% +9.6% −52.4% +52.4% −12.6% +12.6% −20.5% +20.5% −37.5% +37.5% −158% +158% −13% +13% −52.9% +52.9% −39.8% +39.8% +0% +0% −8.7% +8.7% −14.8% +14.8% −18.2% +18.2% −83.5% +83.5% Full HD −15.5% +15.5% +3.8% −3.8% −27.2% +27.2% −20.5% +20.5% −24.7% +24.7% −40% +40% −36.3% +36.3% −32% +32% −34.7% +34.7% −37.8% +37.8% +54.4% −54.4% Full HD +16.3% −16.3% 1440p −53.7% +53.7% −30.2% +30.2% 1440p −16.1% +16.1% −19.6% +19.6% −32.3% +32.3% −28.6% +28.6% −52.7% +52.7% −18.1% +18.1% −53.8% +53.8% −37.3% +37.3% −11.4% +11.4% −21.1% +21.1% −25.3% +25.3% −17.3% +17.3% 1440p −7.1% +7.1% 4K −55.4% +55.4% +4.5% −4.5% −47.5% +47.5% +56.2% −56.2% −85% +85% −36.1% +36.1% 4K −25% +25% −39.4% +39.4% −40.5% +40.5% −31.6% +31.6% −61.3% +61.3% −42.7% +42.7% −16.7% +16.7% −69.2% +69.2% 4K −49% +49% This is how GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti compete in popular games: Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games: All in all, in popular games: GTX 1080 Ti has 8% lower power consumption. RTX 2080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 4.39174 votes Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: 44058 votes Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 68 45 Place by popularity 49 not in top-100 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 21.81 22.79 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Turing (2018−2022) GPU code name GP102 Turing TU102 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 28 February 2017 (7 years ago) 27 August 2018 (6 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $699 $999 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 4352 Core clock speed 1481 MHz 1350 MHz Boost clock speed 1600 MHz 1545 MHz Number of transistors 11,800 million 18,600 million Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 270 Watt Maximum GPU temperature 91 °C no data Texture fill rate 354.4 420.2 Floating-point performance 11.34 gflops 13.45 gflops Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 267 mm 267 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt no data Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 2x 8-pin SLI options + - VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR5X GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 11 GB Memory bus width 352 Bit 352 Bit Memory clock speed 11000 MHz 14000 MHz Memory bandwidth 484.4 GB/s 616.0 GB/s Shared memory - - Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C Multi monitor support + no data HDMI + + G-SYNC support + + Supported technologies
GPU Boost 3.0 no data VR Ready no data + Ansel + no data API compatibility
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_1) Shader Model 6.4 6.5 OpenGL 4.5 4.6 OpenCL 1.2 2.0 Vulkan + 1.2.131 CUDA + 7.5 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
GeekBench 5 CUDA
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
Gaming performance
Average FPS across all PC games
Full HD 131 167 1440p 84 119 4K 67 90 FPS performance in popular games
Low PresetCyberpunk 2077 85−90 100−110
Medium PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 100 125 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85 107 Battlefield 5 162 244 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100 100−110 Cyberpunk 2077 85−90 100−110 Far Cry 5 122 163 Far Cry New Dawn 110−120 197 Forza Horizon 4 293 346 Hitman 3 100−110 161 Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200 285 Metro Exodus 144 144 Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110 106 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 215 216 Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140 266
High PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 145 181 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85 91 Battlefield 5 147 224 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100 100−110 Cyberpunk 2077 85−90 100−110 Far Cry 5 96 132 Far Cry New Dawn 59 152 Forza Horizon 4 284 321 Hitman 3 100−110 156 Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200 267 Metro Exodus 144 144 Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110 110−120 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 196 220−230 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100 110−120 Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140 255
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 71 82 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85 80 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81 103 Cyberpunk 2077 85−90 100−110 Far Cry 5 73 91 Forza Horizon 4 120 168 Hitman 3 100−110 139 Horizon Zero Dawn 153 202 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167 220−230 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 135 Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140 90
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 121 104
High PresetBattlefield 5 108 166 Far Cry New Dawn 86 112
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 62 72 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 67 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62 82 Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 50−55 Far Cry 5 55 84 Forza Horizon 4 265 313 Hitman 3 65−70 100 Horizon Zero Dawn 118 162 Metro Exodus 88 98 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123 140−150 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80 90−95 Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220 251
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 98 105
High PresetBattlefield 5 56 87 Far Cry New Dawn 69 66 Hitman 3 40−45 59 Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210 130 Metro Exodus 60 111 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 98
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 40 50 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 46 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37 52 Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 24−27 Far Cry 5 31 50 Forza Horizon 4 75 107 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72 80−85 Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 44
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 49 73 Pros & cons summary
Performance score 48.12 56.41 Recency 28 February 2017 27 August 2018 Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 270 Watt Vote for your favorite
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
Questions & comments
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsGeForce RTX2080
GeForce RTX2080 Ti vsRadeon RX6800
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsTITANRTX
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsRadeon Pro555X
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsRadeon Pro560X
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsRadeon ProVega 20
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsGeForce GTX1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsGeForce RTX2060
GeForce GTX1080 Ti vsGeForce RTX2070