By hiring an FCA attorney, a PPP loan fraud whistleblower may file a qui tam lawsuit against the fraudster on behalf of the U.S. government. In successful qui tam suits, PPP loan fraud whistleblowers are elgible to receive an award between 15 and 30 percent of the funds recovered.
Updated May 8, 2024
Passed in March 2020, the CARES Act established a $800 billion Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) which offered fully guaranteed Small Business Association (SBA) loans to small businesses adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the speed with which PPP loans were issued, the program was targeted by a unprecedented number of fraudsters.
Individuals with knowledge of PPP loan fraud may report the misconduct under the False Claims Act (FCA). By hiring an experienced FCA attorney, a PPP loan fraud whistleblower may file a qui tam lawsuit against the fraudster on behalf of the U.S. government. Under the FCA, PPP loan fraud whistleblowers who file a successful qui tam lawsuit are eligible for an award between 15 and 30 percent of the funds collected by the government in the case.
Key Takeaways
- The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), established in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, offered guaranteed loans to small businesses affected by the pandemic
- Given the urgency with which the U.S. government issued loans, the PPP led to an unprecedented amount of fraud and the Department of Justice is committed to holding these fraudsters accountable
- PPP loan fraud is a violation of the False Claims Act
- Under the False Claims Act, individuals with knowledge of PPP loan fraud may file a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit against the fraudster on behalf of the U.S. government
- In successful qui tam suits, PPP loan fraud whistleblowers are entitled to 15-30% of the funds recovered by government
The Paycheck Protection Program
In March 2020 as the Covid-19 pandemic shut down the economy, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, a sprawling 2.2 trillion economic stimulus bill. As part of the CARES Act, Congress established the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).
The PPP offered loans to small businesses in order to provide economic relief in response to the adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The program offered quick access to Small Business Association (SBA) guaranteed loans to companies with 500 or fewer employees in order to finance the payroll and other certain costs, including rent and utilities payments.
Eligible businesses could qualify for one SBA guaranteed loan under the PPP. Third-party lenders were authorized by the SBA to underwrite and approve the PPP loans. To obtain loans, an authorized representative of a small business would sign and submit a PPP loan application through the lender’s platform. The representative was required to acknowledge the PPP program rules and make certain affirmative certifications in order to qualify for a PPP loan.
In total, the U.S. government paid out approximately $800 billion in PPP loans by the time the program closed in May 2021. Approximately 92% of all the loans have been granted full or partial forgiveness so far.
PPP Loan Fraud
Given the urgent need for the PPP loans due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government quickly approved loan applications. This led to an unprecedented amount of fraud.
PPP loan fraud can take many specific forms. In general, many PPP loan frauds stem from loan applicants making misrepresentations or false and misleading statements in a PPP loan application. This can include false statements about a company’s payroll, costs, size, number of employees, and other financial statistics.
Other types of PPP loan fraud include applying for multiple loans and misusing PPP loan funds for improper or unapproved purposes.
In response to the large amount of PPP loan fraud, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) established a COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force. The DOJ has already launched numerous enforcement actions against individuals and companies charged with PPP loan fraud.
“The Justice Department remains committed to using every available federal tool — including criminal, civil, and administrative actions — to combat and prevent COVID-19 related fraud,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “We will continue to hold accountable those who seek to exploit the pandemic for personal gain, to protect vulnerable populations, and to safeguard the integrity of taxpayer-funded programs.”
The False Claims Act
PPP loan fraud is a violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). Originally passed during the Civil War and modernized in 1986, the FCA covers attempts to defraud the U.S. government by submitting false claims.
A key component of the FCA is its whistleblower provisions. Under the FCA, individuals with knowledge of fraud may file qui tam lawsuits against the fraudster on behalf of the U.S. government. The DOJ then has the option to intervene and take over the case or to let the whistleblower proceed with the lawsuit on the government’s behalf. Regardless of whether the government intervenes, if a qui tam suit is successful the whistleblower is entitled to an award of 15-30% of the funds collected by the government in the case.
Since 1986, the FCA has allowed the U.S. government to recover over $70 billion from fraudsters.
Filing a Qui Tam Whistleblower Suit
In order to report PPP loan fraud under the False Claims Act (FCA) an individual must file a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit. The first step in filing a qui tam suit is to hire an experienced False Claims Act attorney.
Once a PPP loan fraud whistleblower hires an attorney, their attorney can draft a complaint detailing how the fraudster committed PPP loan fraud and provide documentation to back up the allegations. The complaint is then filed in federal court under seal.
After a whistleblower files a qui tam complaint, the U.S. government has the option to intervene and take over the case. If the government passes then the whistleblower may proceed with the lawsuit on behalf of the government.
For more information on filing a qui tam suit read: Filing a Qui Tam Lawsuit
Case Study
On September 22, 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the first-ever Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower case in which the United States intervened against the borrower. In the case, Pan African Interchange LLC and Stanley Damas paid over $220,000 to resolve charges that Pan African Interchange LLC received more than one PPP loan.
The case stemmed from a qui tam lawsuit filed by an anonymous whistleblower who reported the PPP loan fraud. In the case the whistleblower alleged that “after applying for a PPP loan on May 20, 2020, Pan African Interchange LLC, through Stanley Damas, applied for a second PPP loan on May 21, 2020, and having received a PPP loan on May 22, 2020 from its first application, falsely certified that Pan African Interchange had not and would not receive more than one loan prior to December 31, 2020, when on June 12, 2020, Pan African Interchange, LLC signed a promissory note for a second PPP loan that it received on June 24, 2020.”
Latest from Our Blog
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I report PPP loan fraud anonymously?
You can report PPP loan fraud anonymously under the False Claims Act by contacting the Department of Justice (DOJ) or Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Inspector General (OIG). Private individuals to file an anonymous qui tam lawsuit against those who commit fraud against the government can receive a portion of any money recovered as a result of the lawsuit – generally between 15 and 30 percent of the recoveries. It is strongly advised that you seek an experienced attorney to help you through the process – any misstep in the process could result in your claim being dismissed.
What is considered PPP loan fraud?
PPP loan fraud refers to any illegal or fraudulent activity related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a government-funded loan program designed to help small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Examples of PPP loan fraud include:
- Making false statements or providing false information on a PPP loan application
- Misrepresenting the number of employees or payroll expenses to qualify for a larger loan
- Using PPP funds for unauthorized expenses or personal use
- Failing to use the loan funds for the intended purpose of keeping employees on the payroll
- Applying for a PPP loan using a false or stolen identity
- Conspiring with others to commit PPP loan fraud.
How much jail time for PPP loan fraud?
The amount of jail time for PPP loan fraud can vary depending on the specific circ*mstances of the case. It can be considered a federal crime and punishable by up to 30 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million. However, the actual sentence will depend on factors such as the amount of money involved, the number of victims, and the defendant’s criminal history.
New Release
Rules for Whistleblowers
The ultimate guide to blowing the whistle and getting rewarded for doing what's right.
Subscribe for News & Resources
Receive exclusive updates and news from our firm.
Ready to Blow the Whistle?
Information submitted in the client intake form or in email from anyone seeking legal help is covered under the attorney client and work product privileges to the fullest extent of the law. We also highly encourage you to learn about our intake process before submitting an intake. Looking to join the team? Please visit our careers page to explore and apply to openings, fellowships, and internships at our firm.
Your communications are secured and sent over 256-bit SSL encryption. To protect your identity and confidentiality, do not use any devices owned or controlled by a private corporation or governmental entity. It is also recommended to protect your online identity by establishing a new email account that does not identify you and to avoid the use of other online platforms that may disclose your identity.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive whistleblower news and resources crafted by the partners and associates at KKC.
- VIEW ALL
- Alabama Whistleblower Law
- Alaska Whistleblower Law
- Arizona Whistleblower Law
- Arkansas Whistleblower Law
- California Whistleblower Law
- Colorado Whistleblower Law
- Connecticut Whistleblower Law
- Delaware Whistleblower Law
- Florida Whistleblower Law
- Georgia Whistleblower Law
- Hawaii Whistleblower Law
- Idaho Whistleblower Law
- Illinois Whistleblower Law
- Indiana Whistleblower Law
- Iowa Whistleblower Law
- Kansas Whistleblower Law
- Kentucky Whistleblower Law
- Louisiana Whistleblower Law
- Maine Whistleblower Law
- Maryland Whistleblower Law
- Massachusetts Whistleblower Law
- Michigan Whistleblower Law
- Minnesota Whistleblower Law
- Mississippi Whistleblower Law
- Missouri Whistleblower Law
- Montana Whistleblower Law
- Nebraska Whistleblower Law
- Nevada Whistleblower Law
- New Hampshire Whistleblower Law
- New Jersey Whistleblower Law
- New Mexico Whistleblower Law
- New York Whistleblower Law
- North Carolina Whistleblower Law
- North Dakota Whistleblower Law
- Ohio Whistleblower Law
- Oklahoma Whistleblower Law
- Oregon Whistleblower Law
- Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law
- Poland Whistleblower Law
- Puerto Rico Whistleblower Law
- Rhode Island Whistleblower Law
- South Carolina Whistleblower Law
- South Dakota Whistleblower Law
- Tennessee Whistleblower Law
- Texas Whistleblower Law
- Utah Whistleblower Law
- Vermont Whistleblower Law
- Virginia Whistleblower Law
- Washington Whistleblower Law
- West Virginia Whistleblower Law
- Wisconsin Whistleblower Law
- Wyoming Whistleblower Law
© 2021 Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto LLP. All Rights Reserved.
1710 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. All information submitted in the client intake form or in email from anyone seeking legal assistance is considered covered under the attorney client and work product privileges to the fullest extent of the law. While we treat your information as confidential, a lawyer-client relationship is created only by express written agreement signed by both you and Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto.