La récente violation de données chez JPMorgan Chase a envoyé des ondes de choc à travers le secteur financier, touchant 76 millions de foyers et 7 millions de petites entreprises. Confirmée par la banque elle-même, cette attaque, débutée en juin, a soulevé des préoccupations majeures quant à la sécurité des informations personnelles. Dans cet article, nous examinerons en détail les ramifications de cette violation, mettant en lumière les données compromises, les impacts potentiels sur la confiance des consommateurs, et les mesures prises par JPMorgan Chase pour sécuriser ses systèmes.
Détails de la Violation
Dans une déclaration à la Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), JPMorgan Chase a révélé que les informations compromises comprenaient les coordonnées des clients telles que les noms, adresses, numéros de téléphone et adresses e-mail. Les services web et mobiles, tels que Chase.com, JPMorganOnline, Chase Mobile et JPMorgan Mobile, ont été touchés. Cependant, la banque affirme qu'aucune preuve n'indique la compromission des numéros de compte, mots de passe, identifiants d'utilisateur, date de naissance ou numéro de sécurité sociale.
Réponse de JPMorgan Chase
Malgré le vol de certaines informations de compte, JPMorgan Chase assure avoir nettoyé ses systèmes et les avoir sécurisés contre de futures attaques de cette nature. Dans une FAQ publiée sur Chase.com, la banque déclare avoir identifié et fermé les voies d'accès connues de l'attaque, ajoutant qu'aucune preuve ne suggère que les attaquants persistent dans leurs systèmes.
L'ampleur de cette violation risque de miner la confiance des consommateurs dans la sécurité du système financier. Les banques, considérées comme des entités sécurisées, sont désormais elles aussi vulnérables. Cette réalité souligne l'importance d'une approche proactive en matière de sécurité et de sensibilisation du personnel.
Analystes et Perspectives
Des experts en fraude financière tels qu'Avivah Litan soulignent l'impact significatif de cette violation sur la confiance du public. Al Pascual, analyste en fraude financière, met en garde contre le risque que cette violation affaiblisse les efforts de l'industrie financière pour plaider en faveur de normes de sécurité plus strictes par rapport aux détaillants.
Selon des rapports du Wall Street Journal, des pirates, présumément basés en Russie ou en Europe de l'Est, ont probablement infiltré le réseau de la banque par le biais de l'ordinateur personnel d'un employé. Cette attaque souligne la nécessité pour les entreprises de renforcer la sécurité des accès distants et de sensibiliser les employés aux pratiques sécuritaires.
Recommandations pour les Clients
JPMorgan Chase a averti ses clients de se méfier des attaques de phishing, étant donné que les attaquants ont accès à leurs coordonnées. Les clients sont encouragés à être vigilants face à toute communication demandant des informations personnelles et à ne pas cliquer sur des liens ou télécharger des pièces jointes provenant d'expéditeurs inconnus.
Conclusion
En conclusion, la violation de données chez JPMorgan Chase a des implications profondes pour la sécurité des informations financières. Il est impératif que les institutions financières renforcent leurs défenses et que les consommateurs adoptent des pratiques de sécurité rigoureuses. Cette incident souligne également l'importance cruciale de la transparence et de la communication rapide lorsqu'une violation survient, afin de maintenir la confiance du public.
In October 2014, JP Morgan Chase experienced a data breach that affected millions of users. The incident involved unauthorized access to the bank's servers, compromising user contact information. The breach underscored the importance of implementing secure web applications to safeguard sensitive customer data.
JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the US, has faced allegations of fraud, manipulation, and costly mortgage-related settlements, raising concerns about its ethical practices and impact on the public.
JP Morgan Chase reveals massive data breach affecting 76m households. JP Morgan Chase, one of the largest banks in the US, said on Thursday that a massive computer hack affected the accounts of 76 million households and about seven million small businesses, making it one of the largest of its kind ever discovered.
In brief: JPMorgan Chase has been fined nearly $350 million for deficiencies in its trade surveillance data capture procedures. The action, jointly taken by the OCC and Federal Reserve Board, also includes stipulations for the firm to undertake a comprehensive third-party review of policies.
In September 2020, JPMorgan admitted to committing wire fraud in connection with: (1) unlawful trading in the markets for precious metals futures contracts; and (2) unlawful trading in the markets for U.S. Treasury futures contracts and in the secondary (cash) market for U.S. Treasury notes and bonds.
But not everyone in the government was impressed with his financial wizardry. In 1912 a federal committee investigated him for creating unfair monopolies by combining small companies into one big corporation. Like many wealthy men of his time, Morgan was a philanthropist.
The Fed fined the bank alongside the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and said the misconduct occurred between 2014 and 2023. In a separate announcement, the OCC said JPMorgan failed to properly monitor billions of trades across at least 30 global trading venues.
When a bank fails, the FDIC or a state regulatory agency takes over and either sells or dissolves the bank. Most banks in the US are insured by the FDIC, which provides coverage up to $250,000 per depositor, per FDIC bank, per ownership category.
SEC Rules and Regulations provide customer protection
In compliance with the SEC rules and regulations for the protection of customers, JPMS maintains all customers' Fully Paid and Excess Margin securities as required under Rule 15c3-3(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The breach occurred due to a software flaw rather than a hack, but it exposed sensitive financial and personal data, including names, addresses, social security numbers and details related to payment and deductions.
During the Target breach, cybercriminals were able to steal 40 million credit and debit records and 70 million customer records. This occurred during the holiday season in 2013. While it wasn't the single largest security breach in history, it was one of the largest.
The SEC settled with JP Morgan after it was discovered that the company misled investors on the complexity of a number of CDOs that were being offered. Specifically, the firm failed to notify investors that it had taken short positions in more than half of the assets bundled in said CDOs.
He also managed to convince other wealthy patrons to bail out several financial institutions, including the U.S treasury in 1895 and the “panic of 1907,” bringing stability to the market and spurring the future establishment of the Federal Reserve System.
A man walks inside one of the JPMorgan Chase & Co. buildings in New York on June 12, 2023. JPMorgan Chase & Co has been fined $348.2 million by a pair of U.S. bank regulators over its inadequate program to monitor firm and client trading activities for market misconduct, the Federal Reserve announced on Thursday.
The breach occurred due to a software flaw rather than a hack, but it exposed sensitive financial and personal data, including names, addresses, social security numbers and details related to payment and deductions.
In the summer of 2014, a cyberattack on JPMorgan Chase—a financial institution—compromised over 76 million individuals and seven million small businesses. Just weeks before their securities filing, a New York Times article reported that executives believed only one million accounts were affected.
In 1933 as a result of the Glass–Steagall Act, what was known as the House of Morgan was broken up into 3 separate firms – J.P. Morgan & Co., which later became Morgan Guaranty Trust; Morgan Stanley; and Morgan Grenfell in London. But Morgan's companies did not really go away.
An expert from Verizon who helped investigate the hack said the files tested in Scan4You were likely used to figure out where payment information was stored. Cybersecurity experts have said the hacker, identified in court as “Profile 958,” is likely a Ukrainian named Andrey Hodirevski.
Address: 2865 Kasha Unions, West Corrinne, AK 05708-1071
Phone: +3512198379449
Job: Design Planner
Hobby: Graffiti, Foreign language learning, Gambling, Metalworking, Rowing, Sculling, Sewing
Introduction: My name is Dong Thiel, I am a brainy, happy, tasty, lively, splendid, talented, cooperative person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.
We notice you're using an ad blocker
Without advertising income, we can't keep making this site awesome for you.