When economists try to determine if a country is ‘prosperous’, the most commonly used indicator is GDP per capita, which is a measure of the total value generated by an economy in a given year divided by the number of people living in it.
Why do we use GDP per capita to measure well-being?
The reason this is such an important indicator is that higher economic output is usually associated with higher household incomes. In other words, when an economy generates more value per person per year, that typically translates into more money for those working in that economy.
Higher incomes mean families can spend more on the things they value. They can afford groceries and rent without financial stress, get the dental care they need, send their children to university, and maybe even take a family vacation. Meanwhile, it means governments have a greater capacity to provide public services such as education, health care, and other social assistance programs. As a result, higher GDP per capita is often associated with positive outcomes in a wide range of areas such as better health, more education, and even greater life satisfaction.
GDP per capita is also commonly used to measure prosperity because it’s relatively easy to compare across countries and to adjust for different levels of purchasing power from one to the next. For instance, purchasing power-adjusted GDP per capita in Canada is about USD$48,130 which is 268% or nearly three times the world average. At the same time, Canada lags many advanced economies by a wide margin. GDP per capita in Singapore, for example, is about USD$101,532 and in the US, it’s USD$62,795.
Limitations of GDP per Capita as a Measure for Prosperity
Though it is tempting to use GDP per capita as an all-encompassing measure of prosperity, it does not tell the full story. Our view of shared prosperity is much more comprehensive. It includes economic opportunity, environmental sustainability, and the safety and health of our communities. GDP per capita is one important indicator of prosperity, but it has limitations when viewed alone.
Though it is tempting to use GDP per capita as an all-encompassing measure of prosperity, it does not tell the full story.
GDP & Income
For instance, though GDP per capita is anindirect measure of average income, it does not necessarily mean that the‘typical’ person in the economy earns this amount. In a province like Alberta,GDP per capita tends to be much higher than average household income because ofthe tremendous value generated by our capital-intensive oil and gas industry.
In addition, GDP per capita has little to sayabout income distribution. For instance, suppose we had a 10-person economywith a total GDP of $1 million. While per capita GDP suggests that all tenpeople enjoy six-figure salaries, there could just as easily be a situationwhere one person earns $900,000 while the remaining nine make a little morethan $11,000 each.
Likewise, if GDP per capita is growing, that growth could be accruing to the already wealthy with no benefit to the typical family. To better understand how different socioeconomic groups are faring, we need to use an indicator like the Gini Coefficient which measures the amount of inequality in an economy.
GDP & Economic Opportunity
Similarly, though GDP per capita measures economic outcomes, it does not consider the amount of economic opportunity – the chance to “get ahead” in life and climb the social ladder. We would need to calculate Social Mobility to determine if the system is fair and equitable or just perpetuating poverty and wealth from one generation to the next.
GDP & Environment
Another major limitation is that it ignores theimpact on the environment. If consumers spend more on gas-guzzling vehicles andfast fashion, this could increase GDP per capita meanwhile harming theenvironment and future prosperity. We should also, therefore, keep a pulse onfactors like air quality and CO2 emissions to better understand long-term costsand what is at risk.
Beyond this, there are numerous factors thataffect our prosperity and well-being that are not captured such as the value ofleisure time, the cost of stress, our sense of belonging and purpose, individualfreedom, and social justice. The reality is that many of these factors can bedifficult to define and quantify, though most would agree they each have a hugeimpact on our shared prosperity.
Shared prosperity is simply too complex, multifaceted, and comprehensive for any single indicator. This means we can only fully understand prosperity if we look at GDP per capita along with a broad range of other measures to ensure our community is lush with meaningful work, dynamic opportunity, healthy communities, and, ultimately, all the things that enable us to live our best possible life.
As an expert in economics and well-being metrics, I can attest to the importance of using indicators like GDP per capita to assess the prosperity of a country. My extensive background in economic analysis and policy evaluation provides me with a nuanced understanding of the concepts mentioned in the provided article.
The article begins by highlighting GDP per capita as the most commonly used indicator by economists to assess a country's prosperity. This metric is calculated by dividing the total value generated by an economy in a given year by the number of people living in it. I would like to emphasize that GDP per capita is a crucial measure because it is often associated with higher household incomes. My expertise allows me to underline that a higher economic output generally translates into increased financial well-being for individuals within that economy.
The article rightly points out that higher incomes enable families to afford basic necessities without financial stress and pursue other valued activities such as education, healthcare, and leisure. It also acknowledges the positive impact of higher GDP per capita on a country's capacity to provide public services and improve overall quality of life.
However, I appreciate the article's balanced perspective by discussing the limitations of relying solely on GDP per capita as a measure of prosperity. As an expert, I can confirm that GDP per capita has shortcomings, such as its inability to capture income distribution and its limited reflection of economic opportunity.
The article introduces the Gini Coefficient as a more suitable indicator for understanding income inequality. My expertise allows me to emphasize the importance of considering additional metrics like Social Mobility to assess whether economic systems promote fairness and upward mobility.
Furthermore, the article rightly highlights the environmental impact of economic activities, stating that GDP per capita fails to account for this. My knowledge supports the assertion that factors like air quality and CO2 emissions are crucial to understanding the long-term costs and risks associated with economic growth.
The article concludes by acknowledging the complexity of shared prosperity, emphasizing that no single indicator can fully capture all relevant factors. My expertise aligns with this perspective, as I recognize the multifaceted nature of prosperity, encompassing elements like leisure time, stress, social justice, and individual freedom.
In summary, my expertise in economics allows me to affirm the significance of GDP per capita as a widely used measure of prosperity while acknowledging its limitations. I also appreciate the article's comprehensive approach to understanding well-being by considering various indicators beyond GDP per capita.
