Article Navigation
Article Contents
-
Reference
- < Previous
- Next >
Journal Article
Joseph Caspermeyer 1MBE Press Office *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic
Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2017, Pages 776–777, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw290
Published:
02 February 2017
- Split View
- Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
-
Cite
Cite
Joseph Caspermeyer, How Turtles and Crocodiles Lost the Parietal “Third” Eye and Their Differing Color Vision Adaptations, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2017, Pages 776–777, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw290
Close
Search
Close
Search
Advanced Search
Search Menu
The vertebrate eye is a remarkable evolutionary invention, displaying an incredible repertoire, from a soaring falcon’s keen distance vision to the special night and near UV vision of nocturnal primates like the exotic aye-aye.
This extraordinary diversity arose during evolution from just five ancestral opsin proteins (photosensitive pigments found in the retina that initiate vision), whose functions were mixed and matched, either lost or duplicated over eons, to display the wide repertoire in the ability to see in colors in today’s animals.
Now, University of California zoologist Emerling has traced back 200My of eye evolution in turtles and crocodiles and contributed to a new understanding of color vision. It turns out that some turtles have reduced their color vision during their adaptation to fresh water and crocodiles have adapted color vision for their nocturnal habits.
In addition, he has uncovered the genetic clues shown that the evolutionary timing of the loss of the parietal eye (via loss of parietopsin and parapinopsin genes) in turtles and crocodiles (and birds) matches the fossil record, or heat sensitive “third eye” organ found in lizards, as well as other special adaptations.
The research findings from Emerling’s new comparative study of 20 light sensitive genes from four turtle and four crocodile species.
“The most recent ancestor of modern turtles was likely adapted to a freshwater habitat, which would have constrained color vision in these species. Shorter wavelengths, such as violets and blues, tend not to transmit particularly well in rivers and lakes, meaning they would be less available for the eyes of turtles swimming in freshwater,” said Emerling. “Crocodylian eyes show anatomical modifications suggestive of a long period of nocturnal adaptation, which likely had an effect on their color vision as well. Being active at night generally limits the ability to perceive colors, since the cells responsible for color vision (cones) usually do not turn on except under well-lit conditions.”
Consistent with these expectations, Emerling found evidence that turtle color vision has adapted to living in freshwater, with losses and functional modifications of the short wavelength sensitive visual opsins, whereas crocodylians show genomic evidence of adaptations to dim light, with their ancestor losing two of its four color vision channels.
“This means that modern crocodylians generally have diminished color vision, similar to red-green colorblindness in humans,” said Emerling. “However, a combination of genomic data and direct measurements of crocodylian cones suggests that crocodiles reinvented a color channel that they previously lost. They appear to have repurposed an opsin normally used in dim-light colorblind cells (rods), and turned it on in cones. Beyond losing visual opsins, I discovered that crocodylians lost a number of non-visual opsins that have light-dependent functions throughout the body, as well as enzymes that produce a sunscreen that protects against ultraviolet radiation, further evidence of dim-light adaptation. I found that two of these opsins, parietopsin and parapinopsin, are present in the genomes of crocodylians, turtles and birds as nonfunctional remnants. These proteins are found in the “third (parietal) eye” of lizards, and provide genomic corroboration of the loss of this sensory organ documented in the fossil records of these animals.”
Emerling’s results demonstrate the power of comparative genomics to reveal a new pathway of “reinventing” vertebrate color vision, and despite existing 200Ma since the Jurassic period, how crocodiles and turtles first split from the reptilian snakes and lizards through the loss of the light and dark sensing parietal eye.
Reference
Emerling CA.
2016
.
Archelosaurian color vision, parietal eye loss and the crocodylian nocturnal bottleneck
.
Mol Biol Evol
. 34:666–676.
OpenURL Placeholder Text
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]
Download all slides
Advertisem*nt
Citations
Views
3,672
Altmetric
More metrics information
Metrics
Total Views 3,672
3,278 Pageviews
394 PDF Downloads
Since 2/1/2017
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
February 2017 | 21 |
March 2017 | 91 |
April 2017 | 19 |
May 2017 | 18 |
June 2017 | 9 |
July 2017 | 9 |
August 2017 | 5 |
September 2017 | 9 |
October 2017 | 28 |
November 2017 | 14 |
December 2017 | 39 |
January 2018 | 55 |
February 2018 | 26 |
March 2018 | 38 |
April 2018 | 57 |
May 2018 | 42 |
June 2018 | 25 |
July 2018 | 19 |
August 2018 | 39 |
September 2018 | 21 |
October 2018 | 7 |
November 2018 | 27 |
December 2018 | 27 |
January 2019 | 33 |
February 2019 | 49 |
March 2019 | 56 |
April 2019 | 37 |
May 2019 | 41 |
June 2019 | 36 |
July 2019 | 61 |
August 2019 | 34 |
September 2019 | 42 |
October 2019 | 47 |
November 2019 | 40 |
December 2019 | 23 |
January 2020 | 28 |
February 2020 | 32 |
March 2020 | 31 |
April 2020 | 38 |
May 2020 | 24 |
June 2020 | 40 |
July 2020 | 18 |
August 2020 | 35 |
September 2020 | 35 |
October 2020 | 26 |
November 2020 | 26 |
December 2020 | 37 |
January 2021 | 31 |
February 2021 | 33 |
March 2021 | 33 |
April 2021 | 58 |
May 2021 | 25 |
June 2021 | 17 |
July 2021 | 26 |
August 2021 | 28 |
September 2021 | 28 |
October 2021 | 18 |
November 2021 | 37 |
December 2021 | 26 |
January 2022 | 38 |
February 2022 | 36 |
March 2022 | 31 |
April 2022 | 40 |
May 2022 | 45 |
June 2022 | 32 |
July 2022 | 57 |
August 2022 | 60 |
September 2022 | 54 |
October 2022 | 49 |
November 2022 | 44 |
December 2022 | 42 |
January 2023 | 61 |
February 2023 | 46 |
March 2023 | 75 |
April 2023 | 64 |
May 2023 | 65 |
June 2023 | 76 |
July 2023 | 58 |
August 2023 | 61 |
September 2023 | 52 |
October 2023 | 46 |
November 2023 | 29 |
December 2023 | 97 |
January 2024 | 72 |
February 2024 | 62 |
March 2024 | 72 |
April 2024 | 50 |
May 2024 | 70 |
June 2024 | 47 |
July 2024 | 81 |
August 2024 | 46 |
September 2024 | 40 |
Citations
Powered by Dimensions
Altmetrics
Email alerts
Article activity alert
Advance article alerts
New issue alert
In progress issue alert
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic
Email alerts
Advance article alerts
New issue alert
In progress issue alert
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic
Citing articles via
Google Scholar
-
Latest
-
Most Read
-
Most Cited
More from Oxford Academic
Biological Sciences
Evolutionary Biology
Molecular and Cell Biology
Science and Mathematics
Books
Journals
Advertisem*nt