Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries (2024)

1. Griggs, D. et al. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495, 305–307 (2013).

   Article CAS Google Scholar

2. Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22, 8 (2017).

   Article Google Scholar

3. Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

   Article CAS Google Scholar

4. Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).

   Article CAS Google Scholar

5. Jägermeyr, J., Pastor, A., Biemans, H. & Gerten, D. Reconciling irrigated food production with environmental flows for sustainable development goals implementation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15900 (2017).

   Article CAS Google Scholar

6. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).

   Article CAS Google Scholar

7. Rockström, J. et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46, 4–17 (2017).

   Article Google Scholar

8. Searchinger, T. et al. Creating a Sustainable Food Future—A Menu of Solutions to Feed Nearly 10 Billion People by 2050 (World Resources Institute, 2018).

9. Foley, J. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

   Article CAS Google Scholar

10. Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

11. Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

12. Mauser, W. et al. Global biomass production potentials exceed expected future demand without the need for cropland expansion. Nat. Commun. 6, 8946 (2015).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

13. Erb, K.-H. et al. Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11382 (2016).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

    See Also

    How long will Earth exist?Can Earth support 4 billion people sustainably and well? - N-IUSSPAs the World's Population Surpasses 8 Billion, What Are the Implications for Planetary Health and Sustainability? | United NationsWhat is Overpopulation? Causes, Effects, and Solutions

14. Jalava, M. et al. Diet change and food loss reduction: what is their combined impact on global water use and scarcity? Earths Future 4, 62–78 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

15. West, P. C. et al. Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 345, 325–328 (2014).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

16. Jägermeyr, J. et al. Integrated crop water management might sustainably halve the global food gap. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 025002 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

17. Heck, V., Hoff, H., Wirsenius, S., Meyer, C. & Kreft, H. Land use options for staying within the planetary boundaries—synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals. Global Environ. Change 49, 73–84 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

18. Kummu, M. et al. Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci. Total Environ. 438, 477–489 (2012).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

19. Kummu, M. et al. Bringing it all together: linking measures to secure nations’ food supply. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 29, 98–117 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

20. Conijn, J. G., Bindraban, P. S., Schröder, J. J. & Jongschaap, R. E. E. Can our global food system meet food demand within planetary boundaries? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 251, 244–256 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

21. Henry, R. C. et al. Food supply and bioenergy production within the global cropland planetary boundary. PLoS ONE 13, e0194695 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

22. Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

23. Willet, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

24. Schaphoff, S. et al. LPJmL4—a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land: part 2—model evaluation. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 1377–1403 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

25. Heck, V., Lucht, W., Gerten, D. & Popp, A. Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 151–155 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

26. Food Security Indicators (FAO, 2019); www.fao.org/economic/ess/ess-fs/ess-fadata

27. Kahiluoto, H., Kuisma, M., Kuokkanen, A., Mikkilä, M. & Linnanen, L. Taking planetary nutrient boundaries seriously: can we feed the people? Glob. Food Sec. 3, 16–21 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

28. Rasmussen, L. V. et al. Social-ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification. Nat. Sustain. 1, 275–282 (2018).

    See Also

    Overpopulation as a Global Climate and Social Concern

    Article Google Scholar

29. Fischer, G. Transforming the global food system. Nature 562, 501–502 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

30. Fader, M., Gerten, D., Krause, M., Lucht, W. & Cramer, W. Spatial decoupling of agricultural production and consumption: quantifying dependence of countries on food imports due to domestic land and water constraints. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014046 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

31. O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F. & Steinberger, J. K. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat. Sust. 1, 88–95 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

32. World in Transition: Governing the Marine Heritage (WBGU, 2013).

33. Nash, K. L. et al. Planetary boundaries for a blue planet. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1625–1634 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

34. Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

35. Ostberg, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W. & Gerten, D. Three centuries of dual pressure from land use and climate change on the biosphere. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 044011 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

36. Fader, M., Rost, S., Müller, C., Bondeau, A. & Gerten, D. Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: present and potential future patterns. J. Hydrol. 384, 218–231 (2010).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

37. Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H. & Kabat, P. Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 5041–5059 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

38. Biemans, H. et al. Impact of reservoirs on river discharge and irrigation water supply during the 20th century. Water Resour. Res. 47, W03509 (2011).

    Article Google Scholar

39. Flörke, M. et al. Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: a global simulation study. Global Environ. Change 23, 144–156 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

40. de Vries, W., Kros, J., Kroeze, J. C. & Seitzinger, S. P. Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 392–402 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

41. Velthof, G. L. & Mosquera, J. Calculation of Nitrous Oxide Emission from Agriculture in the Netherlands: Update of Emission Factors and Leaching Fraction Alterra Report 2251 (Alterra, 2011).

42. Bouwman, A. F. et al. Global trends and uncertainties in terrestrial denitrification and N₂O emissions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 368, 20130112 (2013).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

43. Lamarque, J.-F. et al. Multi-model mean nitrogen and sulfur deposition from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): evaluation of historical and projected future changes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 7997–8018 (2013).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

44. Vitousek, P. M., Menge, D. N. L., Reed, S. C. & Cleveland, C. C. Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 368, 20130119 (2013).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

45. Cleveland, C. C. et al. Global patterns of terrestrial biological nitrogen (N₂) fixation in natural ecosystems. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 623–645 (1999).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

46. Bodirsky, B. L. et al. N₂O emissions of the global agricultural nitrogen cycle—current state and future scenarios. Biogeosciences 9, 4169–4197 (2012).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

47. von Bloh, W. et al. Implementing the nitrogen cycle into the dynamic global vegetation, hydrology, and crop growth model LPJmL (version 5.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2789–2812 (2018).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

48. Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J. & Garnier, J. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105011 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

49. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (IUCN and UNEP-WCMC, accessed 20 October 2015); www.protectedplanet.net

50. Pimm, S. L. et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, e1246752 (2014).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

51. Bodirsky, B. L. & Müller, C. Robust relationship between yields and nitrogen inputs indicates three ways to reduce nitrogen pollution. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105011 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

52. Oldeman, L. R., Hakkeling, T. R. & Sombroek, W. G. GLASOD: World Map of Human-Induced Soil Degradation (International Soil Reference and Information Centre, 1991).

53. Lehner, B. & Döll, P. Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 296, 1–22 (2004).

    Article Google Scholar

54. Smil, V. Nitrogen in crop production: an account of global flows. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 647–662 (1999).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

55. Bodirsky, B. L. et al. Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nat. Commun. 5, 3858 (2014).

56. Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

57. Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy (EC, 2015).

58. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases Technical Report Series 196 (WHO, 2003).

59. Kummu, M., Ward, P. J., de Moel, H. & Varis, O. Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia. Environ. Res Lett. 5, 034006 (2010).

    Article Google Scholar

60. Gerten, D. et al. Model output for: “Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries” (GFZ Data Services, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.021/

Download references