FBAR Penalties: (Almost) Everything You Need to Know 2024 (2024)

An FBAR Penalties Overview

When it comes to having to report foreign bank accounts, assets, and investments, the first international tax form that comes to mind for most taxpayers is the FBAR. The FBAR refers to foreign bank and financial accounts reporting (aka FinCEN Form 114). Unlike most other international tax reporting forms, the FBAR is not an IRS form. Rather, it is a FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) form — although the Internal Revenue Service is tasked with enforcement, compliance, and assessing penalties for failing to file the form timely and accurately. When it comes to FBAR penalties, there is a lot of misinformation online about:

• • • How FBAR penalties are assessed,

    • How FBAR penalties can be challenged,

    • How to qualify for an FBAR penalty abatement, and

    • How to file a lawsuit again the U.S. government for Taxpayers who want to litigate.

In addition, there was a recent Supreme Court case (Bittner) that limits the IRS’s ability to assess non-willful FBAR penalties, along with another recent court case that (may) allow taxpayers who make certain treaty elections to avoid having to file the FBAR. Let’s walk through the FBAR penalties framework, including examples and recent cases to be aware of.

FBAR Penalties (Civil vs Criminal)

First, it is important to note that there are different types of FBAR penalties. They typically fall into three different categories:

• • • Civil Non-Willful Penalties

    • Civil Willful Penalties

    • Criminal Penalties

With the increase in FBAR enforcement, FBAR violations have become much more common. That is because most of the time, the failure to file the FBAR is due to negligence or something similar — but does not reach the level of willfulness (including willful blindness, or reckless disregard). However, some taxpayers may become subject to willfulness penalties, especially if the Internal Revenue Service believes that the taxpayers acted with willful blindness or reckless disregard (even when there was no direct intent to violate the statute).

Criminal FBAR penalties are less common and typically occur in situations in which the taxpayer violated other statutes, such as tax evasion, tax fraud, money laundering, structuring, and smurfing.

Civil Non-Willful FBAR Penalties

Before the 2023 Supreme Court’s ruling in Bittner, the issuance of FBAR penalties was like the Wild West— a free-for-all in which some jurisdictions would penalize taxpayers based on the number of accounts they had, whereas other jurisdictions would penalize taxpayers based on the non-filing of the form.

31 U.S.C. 5321 (a)(5)

• • • • (5) Foreign financial agency transaction violation.—

        • (A) Penalty authorized.—

          • The Secretary of the Treasury may impose a civil money penalty on any person whoviolates, or causes any violation of, any provision of section 5314.

        • (B) Amount of penalty—

          • (i) In general—

            See Also

            Individuals Filing the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)

            • Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the amount of any civil penalty imposed under subparagraph (A) shall not exceed $10,000.

          • (ii) Reasonable cause exception.—No penalty shall be imposed under subparagraph (A) with respect to any violation if—

            • (I) such violation was due to reasonable cause, and

            • (II) the amount of the transaction or the balance in the account at the time of the transaction was properly reported.

Bittner Non-Willful Example

For example, if a taxpayer was required to file an annual FBAR to report 20 accounts with an aggregate total of $900,000, but failed to do so, the IRS could go after the taxpayer for $200,000 worth of penalties for each year it was not filed — although there is a statutory maximum for the compliance period. The Supreme Court in Bittner limits the IRS’s ability to issue civil non-willful FBAR penalties. Instead of being able to penalize taxpayers per account, rather the IRS is limited to issuing penalties per form. Thus, no matter how many accounts the taxpayer fails to report, the IRS is limited to issuing a $10,000 penalty per year, noting the $10,000 adjusted for inflation.

Burden of Proof

Interestingly, even though FBAR penalties could effectively wipe out a person’s entire net worth, the U.S. government is only required to prove FBAR violations by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest level required to prove a violation and it’s typically thought of as being just over 50%. In fact, back in 2008, even IRS counsel surmised in a previous memorandum that the burden should be at least clear and convincing evidence — which is required to prove tax fraud — and thought of as being about 75%. Unfortunately, courts across the nation have disagreed and at the end of the day concluded that even though it may be a lot of money, it is just a financial issue (unlike fraud) and the burden should be limited to a preponderance of the evidence standard.

Three Examples of Civil Non-Willful FBAR Penalties

These examples are for illustrative purposes only and each person’s facts and circ*mstances may change the outcome.

• • • Example 1: David is a second year lawful permanent resident who began working with the CPA this year. David learned for the first time that in his prior year he should have reported his foreign bank accounts. This would be an example of non-wilfulness.

  • • Example 2: Mary is a US person who has had a foreign bank account for several years below $10,000, but was unaware that she was also required to report her foreign pension plans. When Mary aggregates her foreign pension plan with her foreign bank accounts, she exceeds $10,000 and should have fied the FBAR in prior years.

  • • Example 3: Linda researched the foreign account reporting rules, but misunderstood that it is not $10,000 per account, put $10,000 in annual aggregate total. Linda had several small accounts that were below $10,000 and thus she should have filed FBAR. prior years.

Civil Willful FBAR Penalties

The Supreme Court rejected a case that would have resolved the issue of willfulness FBAR penalties. When it comes to willfulness, the IRS is authorized to penalize taxpayers a 50% penalty on the highest value of the account. In addition, there is a floor wherein the IRS can technically issue penalties that are 50% of the maximum value or $100,000, whichever is higher. And, the $100,000 is also adjusted for inflation.

Three Examples of Civil Willful FBAR Penalties

These examples are for illustrative purposes only and each person’s facts and circ*mstances may change the outcome.

• • • Example 4: Dana is a U.S. citizen who began working with a CPA in the current year. The CPA told her that she is required to report foreign accounts. The CPA asked Dana to provide the foreign account information to her so that she could determine if she meets the threshold requirements for filing the different international reporting forms. Dana was aware of their request but did not want to comply and instead submitted the forms herself without the FBAR.

  • • Example 5: Scott is a lawful permanent resident who received a very large inheritance overseas and failed to file Form 3520. He was worried about form 3520 penalties so he did not follow late form and also did not file the FBAR hoping that the IRS would not detect the non-compliance, since he was concerned if he filed the FBAR, they IRS may ponder where the money came from — leading to a Form 3520 penalty issue.

  • • Example 6: Miranda was speaking with some of her friends who are all originally from outside of the United States. Miranda’s friends were talking about the different tax forms they file including the FBAR. Miranda realized she had the same exact type of foreign accounts but she got worried and decided not to look into the matter any further even though she was pretty sure she would also be required to file these forms.

Criminal FBAR Penalties

Criminal FBAR penalties are sought through criminal procedures and do not go through the same civil penalty enforcement processes. Typically, defendants are granted a right to jury and the government must prove their case by the beyond a reasonable doubt standard which is thought of as being 90% to 95%. Again though, criminal FBAR penalties are rare so if you are speaking with tax professionals who are goading you into believing that you are criminal because of your noncompliance, it is important to note that they are probably trying to fear-monger you and get you for a large fee to avoid an outcome that would probably not happen (aka getting arrested).

Assessed Penalties and Appeal

Various ways that taxpayers may be placed on notice that an FBAR penalty is brewing. First, some lucky taxpayers may receive a Letter 3800 which is not a penalty, but rather a warning to get it together and begin filing timely FBARs — but this letter does not result in a penalty. Otherwise, taxpayers may receive a penalty notice or a letter instructing them that they are now under audit and this will typically also include an IDR letting the taxpayer know what the IRS is looking for in terms of information about the foreign accounts. Typically, in this type of situation, the IRS already has information about the noncompliant accounts.

Liens, Levies, Seizures

Once the penalty has been assessed, taxpayers have to be cognizant of the fact that the IRS may use different common not-so-friendly methods to collect the assessed penalty. The IRS may finally notice a federal tax lien, issue a levy against a person’s bank account or wages, and even pursue a seizure notice even though seizure notices are less common.

Jeopardy Assessment

When the IRS believes that the taxpayer may flee the country or deplete the assets making it difficult for the IRS to collect on penalties they believe are rightfully due and owing they may pursue a jeopardy assessment. With a jeopardy assessment, the IRS can bypass all the typical hurdles it must face before being able to collect an assessed penalty. Noting, a jeopardy assessment does give the taxpayer the immediate right to go to court as was the case in a recent foreign grantor versus non-grantor trust case that was filed in 2024.

Recent Cases

Over the past few years, there have been several very important FBAR penalty cases to consider which will impact how a taxpayer is penalized and how they can challenge the penalty. Let’s take a look at some of the more recent cases.

Non-Willful Penalty Limitations (Bittner)

In Bittner, the Supreme Court held that the IRS is limited to a per form non-willful civil FBAR penalty and not a per account penalty.

Pre-Payment Flora Rule (Mendu)

In Mendu, the Court held that a Taxpayer was not required to pre-pay the FBAR penalty before filing a lawsuit in Federal Court.

Treaty Election (Aroeste)

In Aroeste, the court held that Taxpayers who qualified for a treaty election to be treated as foreign persons for tax purposes should not be subject to FBAR requirements.

Reckless Disregard (6^th Cir, Kelly)

In Kelly, the court held that reckless disregard still qualifies as willfulness when it comes to FBAR violations.

Repatriation Order and Contempt (Kelly)

In Kelly, the court held the Defendant in contempt (including jail) because the court found he was in violation of the Court’s order to repatriate his funds to satisfy an FBAR penalty.

Late Filing Penalties May be Reduced or Avoided

For Taxpayers who did not timely file their FBAR and other international information-related reporting forms, the IRS has developed many different offshore amnesty programs to assist taxpayers with safely getting into compliance. These programs may reduce or even eliminate international reporting penalties.

Current Year vs Prior Year Non-Compliance

Once a taxpayer missed the tax and reporting (such as FBAR and FATCA) requirements for prior years, they will want to be careful before submitting their information to the IRS in the current year. That is because they may risk making aquiet disclosure if they just begin filing forward in the current year and/or mass filing previous year forms without doing so under one of the approved IRS offshore submission procedures. Before filing prior untimely foreign reporting forms, taxpayers should consider speaking with a Board-Certified Tax Law Specialist who specializes exclusively in these types of offshore disclosure matters.

Avoid False Offshore Disclosure Submissions (Willful vs Non-Willful)

In recent years, the IRS has increased the level of scrutiny for certain streamlined procedure submissions. When a person is non-willful, they have an excellent chance of making a successful submission to Streamlined Procedures. If they are willful, they would submit to the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program instead. But, if a willful Taxpayer submits an intentionally false narrative under the Streamlined Procedures (and gets caught), they may become subject to significant fines and penalties.

Need Help Finding an Experienced Offshore Tax Attorney?

When it comes to hiring anexperiencedinternationaltax attorney to represent you forunreported foreign and offshore account reporting,it can become overwhelming for taxpayers trying to trek through all the false information and nonsense they will find in their online research. There are only a handful of attorneys worldwide who areBoard-Certified Tax Specialistsand who specializeexclusively in offshore disclosure and international tax amnesty reporting.

Golding & Golding: About Our International Tax Law Firm

Golding & Goldingspecializes exclusivelyin international tax, specificallyIRS offshore disclosure. Contact our firm todayfor assistance.