Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (2024)

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Current Research in Behavioral Sciences. 2021 Nov; 2: 100033.

Published online 2021 Apr 20. doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100033

PMCID: PMC8690843

PMID: 38620720

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Abstract

The study stipulates phases to observe the proposed mechanism in formulating the travel and leisure industry's recovery strategies. The present pandemic COVID-19 has resulted in global challenges, economic and healthcare crises, and posed spillover impacts on the global industries, including tourism and travel that the major contributor to the service industry worldwide. The tourism and leisure industry has faced the COVID-19 tourism impacts hardest-hit and lies among the most damaged global industries. The leisure and internal tourism indicated a steep decline amounting to 2.86 trillion US dollars, which quantified more than 50% revenue losses. In the first step, the study explores the consequences and settings of the COVID-19 pandemic and how innovation and change can contribute to the tourism industry's revival to the next normal. Thus, the study determines that tourism enterprises and scholars must consider and change the basic principles, main assumptions, and organizational situations related to research and practice framework through rebuilding and establishing the tourism sector. In the second step, the study discusses direct COVID-19 tourism impacts, attitudes, and practices in gaining the leisure industry's boom and recovery. In the third phase, the study proposes to observe the characteristics and COVID-19 tourism consequences on the travel and tourism research. The findings provide insights in regaining the tourism industry's operational activities and offer helpful suggestions to government officials, scholars, and tourism firms to reinvest in the tourism industry to set it back to a normal position.

Keywords: Travel risks, COVID-19 impacts; Sustainability, Mental health; Economic crisis

Graphical abstract

1. Introduction

The appearance of the lethal disease COVID-19 has resulted in massive financial losses and caused global health and economic crises worldwide (Andersonetal., 2020; McKennaand Bargh,1998; Brewer,2016). The most frightening news of the seasonal influenza outbreaks, epidemics, pandemics, and catastrophes results in a steep decrease in the travel and tourism industry, a dominant contributor to the service industry (Abbas,2021; Jonesetal., 2015; Avery,2010). The pandemics adversely impact tourists' behaviors and their mental wellbeing (Amanetal., 2019; Baueretal., 2021; Parketal., 2019). As a result, they drop their planned tour plans in fear of the disease infection, as it looks impossible to avoid transmission of the virus during travel (Mamirkulovaetal., 2020; Avery,2017; Meadowsetal., 2019). Besides, tourists travel increases infection risk to other air passengers in the absence of effective vaccines (Suetal., 2021; Huand Zhang,2014; Reynoldsand W.S., 2005; Tonsakeretal., 2014). Travelers play a significant role in transferring viruses, epidemics', outbreaks, or pandemics between local communities' destinations (Hollingsworthetal., 2006; Abbott,2021; Zhongetal., 2021; Lietal., 2018). At present, the entire world is facing crisis communication in the media (Suetal., 2021). The adverse consequences of the COVID-19 on the travel and leisure industry resulted in novel viral disease appurtenance (Suetal., 2020). Infectious viruses are highly contagious, mutate rapidly and increase mortality (LocalBurden of Disease,H.I.V.C. 2021). As a result, novel viruses spread and cause unexpected epidemics or pandemics at any time (NeJhaddadgaretal., 2020, Abbas,2020, Maqsoodetal., 2021). Contagious agents usually communicate from animals to humans, which has affected nurses' work-related life quality (Halimietal., 2019; Bergquistetal., 2020; Firouraghietal., 2020; Lebnietal., 2020). Birds were the cause of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus transmission to humans in 2002 (Shujaetal., 2020). The pandemic has caused a negative impact on patients with chronic diseases (Kianietal., 2013). The camel flu virus, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) virus, was identified in 2012, and camels were the MERS disease source and infected humans (Al-Tawfiqetal., 2014). Infected people spread the virus and pass it to others in their close contacts through droplets, cough, and smear contaminations (Cliffand Haggett,2004; MacIntyre,2020). The earlier study identified that travel restrictions are the most helpful and effective interventions in the early and late phases of infectious disease to minimize its spread and control transmission rate in communities (Kallbekkenand Sælen,2021; Ioannidesand Gyimóthy,2020; Gösslingetal., 2020; Leietal., 2021).

The COVID-19 viral disease caused the coronavirus 2019 pandemic instigated by a fatal infection (SARS-CoV-2) (Aqeeletal., 2020). The health experts first identified this virus in Wuhan, China, in late December 2019. The WHO declared an outbreak of the COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern in January and a global pandemic in March 2020. As of March 15, 2021, this pandemic has infected more than 119 million people, of which more than 2.66 million individuals have died from the lethal infectious disease (Lange,2021). It has made this fatal virus one of the deadliest pandemics in human history. Symptoms of the coronavirus virus infection vary widely, from non to most lethal and life-threatening diseases (Abbasetal., 2021). When people approach each other, the virus is mainly transmitted through the air. It leaves the infected person breathing, coughing, sneezing, or talking and entering another person through their mouth, nose, or eyes. It can also spread through contaminated surfaces. Individuals remain infected from the virus for up to two weeks and may spread the virus even if there are no symptoms among infected people (Anjumetal., 2017; Monmousseauetal., 2020; Rather,2021).

2. Travel and tourism a significant contributor to the global service industry

Globally, travel and tourism are the significant contributors to a leading sector for job creation, socio-economic and cultural development worldwide (McCabeand Qiao,2020). In many cities, regions, and countries, tourism plays a critical role as a strategic pillar of the economy's GDP. The tourism and leisure industry plays a vital role in economic activities and customer satisfaction, but it has also become the most vulnerable industry member (Maetal., 2020). This industry always experiences the hardiest-hits of various diseases, epidemics, seasonal influenza, and global pandemics. The tourism industry encounters the massive adverse consequences of the "black swan" major crisis events, including the global financial crunch in 1997 and 2008, the SARS epidemic in 2003, various social unrests, and earthquakes (Leeand Chen,2021). The emergence of the deadliest viral disease has affected all economic sectors and overwhelmed tourists and customers' satisfaction. Economic activities and business services are contingent on expert forecasts that are based on traditional methods. It could be outdated and ineffective to handle global crisis events (Yuetal., 2020; Wang,2009; Pageetal., 2011). Accurate forecasting methods for the academic world and business operations need the needful response to the COVID-19 impacts. Since late December 2019, the advent of the present pandemic COVID-19 has developed unprecedented global health crises, social emergencies, and profound adverse consequences on the global economy. The current pandemic COVID-19 has resulted in global challenges, renewable energy, carbon emission, economic and healthcare crises, and posed spillover impacts on the global industries, including tourism and travel that the major contributor to the service industry worldwide (Leppand Gibson,2003; Imetal., 2021; Abbasietal., 2021; Abbasietal., 2021a,b). It has massively affected the business firms' sustainable performance, and the CEO role became critical to take innovative decisions to revive economic gains (Mubeenetal., 2020). Social media platforms have provided information to various stakeholders in the crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic (Abbasetal., 2019; Linand Kishore,2021; Lebnietal., 2020). The tourism and leisure industry have experienced COVID-19 tourism impacts the most hardest-hits. This industry falls among the most vulnerable industries worldwide. The leisure, travel, and inbound tourism activities designated a steeper drop causing 2.86 trillion US dollars losses that made up 50% plus loss in revenues. In the first stage, this research study discovers the significance and settings of the current pandemic COVID-19 (Wutetal., 2021). The study explores how innovation and change might contribute to the tourism and leisure industry's revitalization to the next normal (Cuomoetal., 2021).

3. International tourism: regions contribution to the service industry

Europe region is the sole major contributor to the global travel and tourism industry. EU tourism presents one trip out of two by making up a 50% share of worldwide tourism (Naslundetal., 2016). Tourism in European countries makes up nearly 48% of the entire outbound travel and tourism activities globally (Boluketal., 2019). The leisure industry is one of the main components of the global service industry (Ioremberetal., 2021). Travel and tourism provide a substantial contribution to business operations and ultimately contribute to the worldwide economy. The travel and tourism sector is an economic driver to the destination country's local GPD (Wondiradetal., 2021). See Fig.1about DACH countries.

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (3)

DACH countries GDP: The gross domestic product (GDP) from 2010 to 2020

Source: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).

The estimations based on 2018–2020 data on the travel and tourism industry of the DACH states showed a 5.1 trillion dollar contribution to their GDP. In 2019, the tourism industry contributed to Austria's GDP remained 446.31 billion dollars, Germany 3780.55 billion dollars, and Switzerland 704.83 billion dollars. Similarly, in 202, the tourism industry contributed to the Austrian G.D.P. amounted 432.89 billion dollars, Germany 3780.55 billion dollars, and Switzerland 707.87 billion dollars (UNWTO,W. 2019). The region of DAH in Europe consists of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. In 2019, Fig.1 indicates DACH nations GDP amounted to almost 3.86 trillion US dollars. Germany remained the largest and most significant contributor with approximately 5.01 trillion US dollars. The acronym DACH refers to Germany (D), Austria, Switzerland (CH), represents these three neighboring countries. These nations make the most significant community, and German presents as the de-facto national first and official language of most of the population. These three nations collectively represent the highest human development standards indicated in social and economic dimensions. The service industry's contribution to Austria's GDP remained 62.50%, whereas Germany's service industry significantly contributed 61.80% to its GDP. In terms of percentage, the service industry contributed 71.4% to GDP in Austria. There were almost 135 million travelers in 2018 to the DACH Germany remained the third-major spender on a truism, amounting to 94 billion US dollars. European countries region is a global travel and tourism industry with 600 million tourists arriving in Europe each year (Neuburgerand Egger,2020; Dayeetal., 2019). See Fig.2.

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (4)

Europe hosted the largest arrivals of international tourist

Source: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).

The tourism and leisure industry's growth rate accelerated in the 2010s due to many countries' active mobility and participation. Besides, China and the United States are two key market players besides intra-European countries tourism that have primarily contributed to the growth in travel and tourism. The increase in tourist numbers has caused some challenges, and numerous destinations attempted to find sustainable paths in coping with travelers' high intensity. Regardless, the travel and tourism industry has developed positive impacts and a significant contributor to the European economy. It directly contributed approximately 782 billion euros to the EU economy in 2018 and created 14.4 jobs. The statistics indicated the growing number of international tourist arrivals from 2010 to 2019 worldwide. The statistics of 2019 stipulated that there were 146.4 million arrivals of international tourists in North America and 61.4 million in the Middle Eastern countries. The appearances of international tourists showed a year-on-year increase between 2010 and 2019. Europe was one of the major destinations for international travelers in terms of region of origin. The European region accounts for more than 50% of international tourist arrival worldwide, and it is the most visited region globally, according to UNWTO. The travel and tourism industry has become a key driver of cultural and socio-economic progress, and it creates millions of employment opportunities within the travel industry.

In 2019, estimations documented that travel and tourism remained a significant contributor to the world economy. It contributed growth of 9.3 trillion US dollars to the global economy, with a direct contribution of 2.9 trillion US dollars. On the other hand, the travel and tourism industry has faced the hardest-hit of the COVID-19 outbreak and showed a 98% sharp decline in May 2020, which reflected travel bans and restrictions worldwide, amid preventive measures for containing the quick transmission of the pandemic. According to the data information reported by destinations, there was a drastic decline of 56% in arrivals of global tourists in the first five months of 2020 compared to 2019 data for the same period. There were 300 million decreased arrivals of global tourists From January to May 2020 compared to 2019 for the same time. It reported a 320 billion dollars loss in terms of international tourism receipts based on export revenue, more than 300% less than the economic crisis impacts in 2009. Asia and the Pacific region were the first to suffer and recorded a steep 60% drop in arrivals from January to May 2020. The current pandemic's appearance has resulted in a global economic and health crisis and posed unprecedented disruptions to the world economy's leading sectors. See Figure3on destinations of international tourists.

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (5)

Global tourists' destinations by regions indicating international arrivals worldwide

Source: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).

Tourism as a critical sector to local and national socio-economic development relies heavily on energy use. Any rise in the number of tourist arrivals requires an increase in energy demand to support the change (Ioremberetal., 2020). In turn, coupled with the associated increase in travel due to increased tourism, it has some consequences on environmental sustainability (Usmanetal., 2019; Ioremberetal., 2019). The recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has disrupted economic activities globally, constitutes a significant shock to tourism development globally and in the sub-region (Jelilovetal., 2020). In the wake of global economic recovery evidenced by the loosening of lockdowns and commencement of complete internal air travels, there is a need for concerted policies that would increase tourist arrivals, broaden clean energy use and ensure economic and environmental sustainability (Usmanetal., 2019). The pandemic has affected energy consumption patterns and impacted globalization and tourism to rethink innovation for sustainable recovery strategies (Usmanetal., 2020). The pandemic has influenced stock markets and caused inflation (Gosh*tetal., 2020; Dabworetal., 2020). The pandemic has also effected governments budgets for agricultural expenditures on household welfare plans (Ioremberand Jelilov,2018). The travel and tourism industry in Europe was the second-highest affected sector and recorded 58% fewer arrivals, followed by the Middle Eastern countries with a 51% decline. In comparison, Africa and the Americas both reported a 47% decline in tourist arrivals at the same time. Travel and tourism research scholars typically concentrate on exploring the impacts of perceived socio-economic and cultural factors fundamental contributions towards destinations residents (Mamirkulovaetal., 2020; Lindbergand Johnson,1997; Jooetal., 2021). Inbound travel and tourism activities profoundly impact communities with their positive effects on the arrivals of international tourists' interfere with residents of destinations societies' social, cultural, and socio-economic growth and prosperity (Jordanetal., 2021). The virus's outbreak has impacted travel and tourism activities and caused a global travel collapse since mid-March 2020. The arrivals of international tourists showed a sharp decline of 56% from January to May, and a 97% drop in April and a 98% arrivals dropped in May 2020. See Fig.4for arrivals of global tourists.

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (6)

Global tourists' arrivals by months from January to December during 2017-2020.

Source: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).

4. Global health crisis, social stigma, and mental health

The disease outbreaks and pandemics cause global health and economic crises. Pandemics adversely increase mental heal issues and affect tourists' behavior and their mental wellbeing (Amanetal., 2019). In fear of the risks, tourists cancel their planned travel plans as it looks challenging to avoid virus infection during travel time (Mamirkulovaetal., 2020). See Fig.5on global tourist visits.

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (7)

By regions: International tourist arrivals from 2010-2019 worldwide

Source: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).

Tourists and air passengers lead to the risks of virus transmission among communities. It is a lethal disease in the absence of effective vaccines (Suetal., 2021). Air passengers and tourists play a leading role in spreading viruses of pandemics between communities' destinations. The WHO declared an outbreak of the COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern in January and a global pandemic in March 2020. As of March 15, 2021, this pandemic has infected more than 119 million people, of which more than 2.66 million individuals have died from the lethal infectious disease (Lange,2021). It has made this fatal virus one of the deadliest pandemics in human history. The global seasonal influenza outbreaks and pandemic cause adverse consequences on inbound tourism activities during the epidemics crisis, such as COVID-19, SARS, MERS, and ZIKA that developed fears among tourist destination residents (Tamboetal., 2021; McKercherand Chon,2004; Sarkaretal., 2021). The world has encountered health and economic crisis with the advent of the pandemic COVID-19 that has adversely affected more than 200 territories and countries worldwide (Lange,2021; Agarwaletal., 2021; Acteretal., 2020). See Table1for detailed information.

Table 1

COVID-19: Confirmed cases and mortality by the most affected nations as of March 15, 2021.

CountryConfirm casesDeathsCase-fatalityDeaths/100k Pop.
United States29,495,424535,6281.8%163.72
Brazil11,519,609279,2862.4%133.33
India11,409,831158,8561.4%11.74
Russia4,350,72890,9582.1%62.96
United Kingdom4,276,840125,8172.9%189.23
France4,132,10490,9242.2%135.73
Italy3,238,394102,4993.2%169.61
Spain3,195,06272,4242.3%155.00
Turkey2,894,89329,5521.0%35.90
Germany2,585,38573,7012.9%88.87
Colombia2,305,88461,2432.7%123.35
Argentina2,201,88653,8362.4%120.99
Mexico2,167,729194,9449.0%154.48
Poland1,917,52747,2062.5%124.30
Iran1,754,93361,3303.5%74.98
South Africa1,530,03351,4213.4%89.00
Ukraine1,516,86529,9692.0%67.16
Indonesia1,425,04438,5732.7%14.41
Peru1,412,40649,0033.5%153.19
Czechia1,402,42023,3791.7%220.02
Netherlands1,178,50116,2181.4%94.12
Canada918,40622,4842.4%60.67
Chile896,23121,7722.4%116.25
Romania862,68121,5652.5%110.74
Israel820,91360300.7%67.88
Portugal814,51316,6942.0%162.37
Belgium809,86122,5452.8%197.38
Iraq763,08513,7881.8%35.87
Sweden712,52713,1461.8%129.10
Philippines626,89312,8372.0%12.04
Pakistan609,96413,5952.2%6.41

Source: John Hopkins University CSSE COVID-19 Data https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality

Table1 reflects confirmed cases of the pandemic COVID-19 and mortality by the most affected country, as of March 15, 2021, worldwide. The WHO's statistics show that the USA is still dealing with the highest number of confirmed cases, 29,495,424, and a death toll of 535,628. The rate of case-fatality rate is 1.80%. Brazil remains the second most victim country from the infection of this fatal disease of the COVID-19 virus. They reported 11,519,609, with total deaths 279,286, a case fatality rate of 2.4%. The United Kingdom reported confirmed positive infected cases 4,276,840, with a death toll of 125,817 and a case fatality rate of 2.9%.

Table2 reports on the countries with the highest number of deaths due to the infection of the COVID-19, totally confirmed cases, and a case and mortality ratio by most affected countries with the COVID-19 patients, as of March 15, 2021. The World Health Organization announced that the United States of America is still the most affected nation with the highest death toll. The US reported confirmed cases, 29,495,424, total deaths 535,628, and a case-fatality rate of 1.80%. Brazil remains the second most affected country in terms of a total death toll of 279,286, actual confirmed patients 11,519,609, a case fatality rate of 2.40%. Mexico is the third-highest death toll country and reported 2,167,729 real cases, with a death toll of 194,944 and a case fatality ratio of 9.00%. See Table2.

Table 2

COVID-19: Cases and mortality (Deaths) by the most affected states, as of March 15.

CountryConfirmedDeathsCase-FatalityDeaths/100k pop.
United States29,495,424535,6281.80%163.72
Brazil11,519,609279,2862.40%133.33
Mexico2,167,729194,9449.00%154.48
India11,409,831158,8561.40%11.74
United Kingdom4,276,840125,8172.90%189.23
Italy3,238,394102,4993.20%169.61
Russia4,350,72890,9582.10%62.96
France4,132,10490,9242.20%135.73
Germany2,585,38573,7012.90%88.87
Spain3,195,06272,4242.30%155
Iran1,754,93361,3303.50%74.98
Colombia2,305,88461,2432.70%123.35
Argentina2,201,88653,8362.40%120.99
South Africa1,530,03351,4213.40%89
Peru1,412,40649,0033.50%153.19
Poland1,917,52747,2062.50%124.3
Indonesia1,425,04438,5732.70%14.41
Ukraine1,516,86529,9692.00%67.16
Turkey2,894,89329,5521.00%35.9
Czechia1,402,42023,3791.70%220.02
Belgium809,86122,5452.80%197.38
Canada918,40622,4842.40%60.67
Chile896,23121,7722.40%116.25
Romania862,68121,5652.50%110.74
Hungary524,19617,0833.30%174.87
Portugal814,51316,6942.00%162.37
Ecuador302,49816,2405.40%95.06
Netherlands1,178,50116,2181.40%94.12
Iraq763,08513,7881.80%35.87
Pakistan609,96413,5952.20%6.41

Source: John Hopkins University CSSE COVID-19 Data

Table2 shows that India is also one of the most affected states with the highest recorded deaths due to the COVID-19 attack. There were 11,409,831 positive cases, with a death toll of 158,856 and a case-fatality rate of 1.40%. The United Kingdom declared 4,276,840 infected patients of the coronavirus, death toll 125,817, with a case fatality rate of 2.9%. Italy reported total cases 3,238,394, with death numbers 102,499, and a case fatality rate of 3.2%. Russia declared total confirmed cases 4,350,728, deaths 90v,958, with a case fatality rate of 2.10%.

Similarly, France indicated actual confirmed cases of 4,132,104, with a death toll of 90,924 and a case fatality ratio of 2.20%. Germany declared a total number of 2,585,385 COVID-19 positive patients of the COVID-19, with a death toll of 73,701 and a case fatality rate of 2.90%, correspondingly. France declared total confirmed cases 4,132,104, with a death toll of 90,924 and a case fatality rate of 2.90%. Italy reported a total number of infected confirmed patients, 3,238,394, with a death toll of 102,499 and a case fatality rate of 3.20%. See Table 6.

Fig.6 specified that Brazil has controlled the spread to some extent and indicated a decreasing tendency in daily new cases on a 7-day average, as of March 15, 2021. The US is also successful in lowering the daily new cases since January 2021. Similarly, there was a decline in Russia for daily new cases burden since the first week of March 2021. However, Germany has recorded a trend in daily new patients. Italy has also encountered a rise in new cases since February 2021. Globally, several countries have met a second and third wave of the current COVID-19 outbreak. Europe region is affected and became a new epicenter. There were approximately 38 million COVID-19 cases. The hardest-hit of the COVID-19 impacts posed extensive disruptions to the service sector, including the tourism and leisure industry that make up a significant contributor to the GDP of the global economy. Argentina reported a total number of infected confirmed cases 2,201,886, a death toll of 53,836, and a case fatality rate of 2.40%. Fig.6 reflects the trend of the COVID-19 positive cases in different countries, including Italy and France, from March 01, 2020, to March 15, 2021. Spain declared total confirmed cases 3,195,062, with a death toll of 72,424 and a case fatality rate of 2.90%. Likewise, Iran reported a total number of infected confirmed cases 1,754,933, a death toll of 61,330, and a case fatality rate of 3.50%. Colombia declared 2,305,884 cases of the COVID-19, total deaths 61,243, and a case fatality rate of 2.70%.

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (8)

COVID-19 positive cases in Brazil, U.S.A., Germany, and Italy as of March 15, 2021.

Source: John Hopkins University CSSE COVID-19 Data

The pandemic's appearance is still sweeping the world, and numerous regions and states have closed borders with all kinds of travel restrictions to combat the virus transmission (Jimenezetal., 2020). When a transmittable virus infection waves appearance, again and again, it causes a significant decline in mobility and global tourism (Richter,2016). International tourists and air passengers spread the pandemic virus and exacerbate public health and economic crisis worldwide (Hilsenrath,2020; Halletal., 2020).

Table3 indicated that Yemen is highly affected in terms of the case-fatality ratio (CFR=24%) as of March 15, 2021. Yemen reported 2,908 cases, a death toll of 698, and deaths per 100K population is 2.45. Mexico has declared the second-highest case-fatality ratio (CFR= 9%). There were 2,167,729 infected patients with a death toll of 194,944, and per 100K population, deaths are 154.48. Similarly, Syria has shown a case-fatality rate (CFR= 6.70%); total reported cases were 16,556, deaths 1,104, and deaths toll per 100K population was 6.53. Sudan reported case-fatality ratio (CFR = 6.30%), total positive cases 30,973, total deaths 1959, and deaths toll per 100K population was 4.69. See Table3. Table3 specifies COVID-19 cases and mortality (Case-Fatality Ratio) declared by the most affected countries as of March 15, 2021. Table3 indicated that Yemen has shown the highest case-fatality ratio (CFR=24%) as of March 15, 2021, and reported 2,908 infected cases, a death toll of 698, and deaths per 100K population is 2.45.

Table 3

COVID-19: Cases and mortality (Case-Fatality Ratio) by the most affected countries.

CountryConfirmedDeathsCase-FatalityDeaths/100k pop.
Yemen290869824.00%2.45
Mexico2,167,729194,9449.00%154.48
Syria16,5561,1046.70%6.53
Sudan30,87319596.30%4.69
Egypt191,55511,3405.90%11.52
Ecuador302,49816,2405.40%95.06
China101,42148394.80%0.35
Bolivia260,05911,9744.60%105.47
Afghanistan55,9852,4594.40%6.62
Bolivia260,05911,9744.60%105.47
Afghanistan55,98524594.40%6.62
Liberia2030854.20%1.76
Bulgaria283,19411,4724.10%163.32
Zimbabwe36,5041,5044.10%10.42
Somalia93283794.10%2.53
Mali89333634.10%1.9
Tanzania509214.10%0.04
Comoros36461464.00%17.54
Bosnia and Herz.144,83155843.90%167.99
Eswatini17,2396633.80%58.35
Niger48651823.70%0.81
Guatemala183,01465783.60%38.14
Chad43281553.60%1
Peru1,412,40649,0033.50%153.19
Iran1,754,93361,3303.50%74.98
Tunisia242,12484043.50%72.67
South Africa1,530,03351,4213.40%89
Hungary524,19617,0833.30%174.87
Malawi32,86410843.30%5.97
Italy3,238,394102,4993.20%169.61

Source: John Hopkins University CSSE COVID-19 Data. Note: *Bosnia and Herzegovina.

5. Social stigma in the COVID-19 pandemic and mental health issues

The World Health Organization described that social stigma determines a negative linkage between persons or groups who share specific features and particular diseases (Tangetal., 2021; Aletaetal., 2020; Škareetal., 2021). It explains that communities are labeled, discriminated and treated in particular ways because people consider them transmitters of infectious disease and pandemic (Haoetal., 2020; Saqibetal., 2020; Sharifpouretal., 2014). This behavior can lead to negative social behaviors and affect people, family members, relatives, friends, and patients' caregivers (D'Amicoetal., 2020; Wangetal., 2020; Wongetal., 2021; Sahooetal., 2020; Őrietal., 2021). Individuals with infections but have other features can also suffer social stigmatization in the community (Zhengetal., 2021; Crespí-Claderaetal., 2021; Piccinellietal., 2021; Zenkerand Kock,2020). The appearance of the pandemic COVID-19 is leading social stigma in some societies worldwide (Farzaneganetal., 2020; Lynchetal., 2021; Chopraand Arora,2020). People of various socio-economic backgrounds, religious and racial identification have caused some problems to chinses people with increasing discrimination (Turner-Musaetal., 2020; Singhand Subedi,2020; Adjaetal., 2020). This behavior has also affected tourists' minds from the Chinese community (Duanetal., 2020; Ferreeetal., 2021; Mejiaetal., 2021; Ransingetal., 2020). The pandemic has also affected marital life, and numerous studies have reported domestic violence issues globally (Abbasetal., 2020; Piqueroetal., 2021; Gulatiand Kelly,2020; Nomanetal., 2021). Religiosity levels among people have helped to maintain marital satisfaction (Amanetal., 2019; Khooetal., 2021). The coronavirus infection disease is dangerous to elderly diabetic patients (Moradietal., 2020). Women with mental health issues face severe stress due to the emergence of the deadliest disease (YoosefiLebni etal., 2020; Azharetal., 2018; Perzowetal., 2021; Silverio-Murilloetal., 2021; Buckleyand Westaway,2020).

The present pandemic has caused numerous health issues, which resulted in the burden on healthcare systems worldwide (Leand Phi,2021; Karletal., 2020; Scottand Laws,2008). The prevailing global health crisis has affected global communities' livelihood, and destinations are without tourists (Ritchie,2008; Blakeand Sinclair,2003; Wang,2009). The lethal virus outbreak has caused numerous problems for international societies. Researchers of the travel and tourism industry have started to rethink and reshape revival strategies to bring back the following normal economic activities (Kuoetal., 2008; Cró and Martins,2017; Alipertietal., 2019). Accordingly, the COVID-19 tourism impacts and related research will increase awareness by educating the masses, nurturing, reshaping, and handling such an economic crisis by implanting innovation and change to revive the industry. Quite the reverse, the global economy will suffer, and the travel industry can show losses (Sigala,2020). Responding to the increasing research enthusiasm related to studies of COVID-19 tourism impacts requires innovative research studies based on e-tourism. Thus, e-tourism can change the travel and tourism industry's future by providing measurable and multifunctional value structures, structural definitions, theoretical trends, and tangible and flexible technical concepts. Technological innovation requires changes in e-tourism work, including history, reflection, openness, equality, diversity, and innovation (Gretzeletal., 2020).

Travel research scholars propose that e-tourism can transform tourism's future by rendering measurable and versatile value structures, structural definitions, theoretical trends, and tangible and flexible technical conceptions (Maetal., 2021). Scientific-technological innovation requires changes in e-tourism work, consisting of historical, reflectivity, openness, equality, diversity, and innovation. Investigation to promote the tourism sector, numerous researchers have recommended modifying interdisciplinary (Wenetal., 2020), multi-disciplinary (Halletal., 2020), and anti-disciplinary study (Sigala,2018) to create innovatively and flexible planning that questions and moves beyond established pre-assumptions and attitudes. Crisis management determines the primary application process before, during, or after a crisis. Observing the impact and consequences of COVID-19 can include the following significant stakeholders: demand for tourism, tourism resources, tourism organizations, and government leaders (Sigala,2018). These three parties can demonstrate outbreak response, regeneration, and restart cycles to integrate the COVID-19 post-transition phase. For tourism research to be successful and innovative, COVID-19 tourism research does not have to solve the problem at the last point. If this point repeatedly studies "current" issues and relationships but incorporates many "modern" methods into the research structure through modern conceptual views and analysis, it may be equally innovative. Such measures can significantly reveal unresolved problems and complexity, have more critical descriptive ability and interpretation of ideas and relationships, and identify and evaluate the "preparation" for innovation and change (Kimand Lee,2020; Su et al., 2021).

6. Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has reflected social, psychological and socio-economic, and cultural influences on various tourism stakeholders, and they will suffer from the adverse effects for a longer time. The pandemic has provided an 'abundant'' new framework in which tourism scholars and researchers can conduct studies with applicable research models. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 tourism impacts surveys need to ignore or drop the previous methods to execute the tourism and travel industry (MichaelHall,2011). Simultaneously, researchers need to implement feasibility studies, tourism demand forecasting, and active and best practices that would be beneficial and appropriate to explore the COVID-19 consequences on various geographic organizations and stakeholders. They theoretically provide minimal space for advancing the understanding of crisis management and potentiating the pandemic's ability to restart investigation areas and enhance the role and boundaries of tourism science and industry. The purpose of the present work is to encourage researchers to interpret and utilize the COVID-19 as a transformative power to reshape and redesign their research methods based on novel thinking for tourism development and research. Hence, it aims to rebuild the strategies and objectives to motivate and assess the intent, function, and effect of tourism organizations' tourism studies. Crises also stimulate the development and shift of new technologies (Colomboetal., 2016; Zengetal., 2020). Indeed these are not to be treated as unavoidable, un-challengeable and challenging to re-form and re-calibrate to meet specific needs and concrete standards. Scientists have a responsibility to be convinced that COVID-19 tourism studies can guarantee the last consequences.

The current narrative study in the context of the COVID-19 tourism impacts attempts to involve all participants in the same community of travel stakeholders, and it may not be consistent. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on tourism organizations (including intermediaries, transportation planners, and accommodation or attraction providers) based on attributes such as the size, venue, management, and governance types of the tourism industry. Similarly, the travel needs that are very different from leisure and business travel, local and individual tourists show that the various consequences of the COVID-19 are expected and are critical for discussion in specific market sectors. Tourism research in COVID-19 can reveal different distinguishable forces of the pandemic. They can also include advanced predictive capabilities, because of such differences in the context, to predict or test any specific recommendations on identifying any discrepancies and weaknesses that may arise in different tourism stakeholder groups. Specific major tourism stakeholders, including tourism workers, residents, entrepreneurs in the tourism field, and tourism education such as university staff, students, and scholars, are not included in the analysis. The latest cases and issues related to COVID-19 have further worsened travel stakeholders' travel business and working conditions, making their situation more complicated. Investigations in the field of COVID-19 and tourism stakeholder behavior are critical.

Small commercial hoteliers are at risk of losing their property assets because they cannot receive "accommodation charges" to pay their mortgage as COVID-19 is expected to maintain and strengthen current concepts and models, this "root" of tourism work. All this comes from the ongoing recession and rising costs for travel companies. The COVID-19 tourism research requires a careful study of workers' mental, physical, and psychological conditions with a COVID-19 background, such as health, participation, virtual work environment, and other human resources. For instance, during isolation time of the COVID-19, virtual teams and jobs, regular governance, recruitment, leadership, and promotion opportunities fail to encourage, motivate, and retain employees who have re-changed their values and principles.

The COVID-19 tourism impacts on employment have put more pressure on tourism education. It has seriously affected job creation opportunities worldwide. Due to virtual learning and teaching, students also have to deal with training interruptions, recruitment, and unstable employment opportunities in the tourism business. Tourism programs, initiatives, and academic universities face the challenge of reducing new student enrollment, marketing and government support, and research funding. Tourism scholars should consider innovative approaches and research opportunities to determine organizational distance, taking into account the mental health and privacy issues of stakeholders affected by COVID-19. Similarly, teaching aspects must be explored, such as the planning and implementing more "sustainable," flexible, and flexible methods of tourism teaching and the development of students with transferable and practical skills in other business sectors.

Besides, other specialized subjects in the field of COVID-19 are worth investigating. Social entrepreneurship over the past decade increased due to tourism, such as during the 2008 economic crisis. The COVID-19 facilitates these tourism social projects, aiming to build social impact, address the social problems arising from COVID-19, and help those in need. The rapid expansion of relevant social tourism enterprises in COVID-19 provides several opportunities to practice and accurately understand this concept in new biodiversity, stakeholders, and conditions.

From now on, the bet should not be on the increase in visitor numbers but on "better, more comfortable travel, personalized service, while maintaining affordable prices." The tourism industry should consider starting renovations of hotels, improving staff quality, simplifying the sale of tour groups and customer registration, and moving to digital technology. Particular attention should be paid to family entertainment: special programs for children and adolescents, the development of appropriate menus, entertainment systems, etc. Future pandemics are likely to recover fully, so tourism must first provide high-quality sanitation measures. For example, all hotels may require protective masks and gloves for employees, visitors, and disinfectants. To avoid overcrowding, restaurants should serve their customers in shifts. The beach can be divided into blocks separated from each other to maintain social distance. Besides, scientists, the Government, and the tourism industry should agree and hold the latest tourism sector discussions to better tourism. Travel companies and their partners in each region can recently start using their time to make their proposals more sustainable, if financially possible. The time has come to reposition the tourism industry and change the tourism products. There is a need to review the measures and prevent abandonment, at least in part after the coronavirus pandemic from mass tourism, which we previously knew. Specifically, among the comprehensive measures for tourism development in the COVID-19 pandemic, the study recommends that the Government develop a significant initiative with specific proposals to improve tourism.

Funding

We have not received any funding to execute this research study, the rigorous procedure of collecting data, and other associated processes to conduct this study.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors are well informed and declared no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful for professional EDITAGE editing language services to ensure that English grammar is errors free for this manuscript.

Data and Code availability statement

  • Data is available at the request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Abbas J., et al. The impact of social media lon earning behavior for sustainable education: evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability. 2019;11(6):1683. [Google Scholar]
  • Abbas J., et al. Exploring the relationship between intimate partner abuses, resilience, psychological, and physical health problems in Pakistani married couples: a perspective from the collectivistic culture. Sex. Relat. Ther. 2020:1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Abbas J. The impact of coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) epidemic on individuals mental health: the protective measures of Pakistan in managing and sustaining transmissible disease. Psychiatr. Danub. 2020;32(3–4):472–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abbas J., et al. The role of social media in the advent of COVID-19 pandemic: crisis management, mental health challenges and implications. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy. 2021;14 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abbas J. Crisis management, transnational healthcare challenges and opportunities: the intersection of COVID-19 pandemic and global mental health. Res. Glob. 2021 [Google Scholar]
  • Abbasi K.R., et al. How energy consumption, industrial growth, urbanization, and CO2 emissions affect economic growth in Pakistan? A novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Energy. 2021;221 [Google Scholar]
  • Abbasi K.R., et al. Analyzing the role of industrial sector's electricity consumption, prices, and GDP: A modified empirical evidence from Pakistan. Aims Energy. 2021;9(1):29–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Abbasi K.R., Abbas J., Tufail M. Revisiting electricity consumption, price, and real GDP: a modified sectoral level analysis from Pakistan. Energy Policy. 2021;149 [Google Scholar]
  • Abbott A. COVID's mental-health toll: how scientists are tracking a surge in depression. Nature. 2021;590(7845):194–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Acter T., et al. Evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A global health emergency. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;730 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Adja K.Y.C., et al. Pandemics and social stigma: Who's next? Italy's experience with COVID-19. Public Health. 2020;185:39–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Agarwal A., et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess preventive practices against COVID-19 pandemic in the general population. Prev. Med. Rep. 2021;22 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aleta A., et al. A data-driven assessment of early travel restrictions related to the spreading of the novel COVID-19 within mainland China. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2020;139 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aliperti G., et al. Tourism, crisis, disaster: an interdisciplinary approach. Ann. Tour. Res. 2019;79 [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Tawfiq J.A., Zumla A., Memish Z.A. Travel implications of emerging coronaviruses: SARS and MERS-CoV. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2014;12(5):422–428. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aman J., et al. The relationship of religiosity and marital satisfaction: the role of religious commitment and practices on marital satisfaction among Pakistani respondents. Behav. Sci. 2019;9(3):30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aman J., et al. The influence of Islamic religiosity on the perceived socio-cultural impact of sustainable tourism development in Pakistan: a structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability. 2019;11(11):3039. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson R.M., et al. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet N. Am. Ed. 2020;395(10228):931–934. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Anjum M.N., et al. Analyzing predictors of customer satisfaction and assessment of retail banking problems in Pakistan. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2017;4(1) [Google Scholar]
  • Aqeel M., et al. The influence of illness perception, anxiety and depression disorders on students mental health during COVID-19 outbreak in Pakistan: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Hum. Rights Healthc. 2020:14. [Google Scholar]
  • Avery E. Contextual and audience moderators of channel selection and message reception of public health information in routine and crisis situations. J. Public Relat. Res. 2010;22(4):378–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Avery E.J. Public information officers’ social media monitoring during the Zika virus crisis, a global health threat surrounded by public uncertainty. Public Relat. Rev. 2017;43(3):468–476. [Google Scholar]
  • Azhar A., et al. Linking infidelity stress, anxiety and depression: evidence from Pakistan married couples and divorced individuals. Int. J. Hum. Rights Healthc. 2018;11(3):214–228. [Google Scholar]
  • Bauer A., et al. Integrating youth mental health into cash transfer programmes in response to the COVID-19 crisis in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bergquist R., Kiani B., Manda S. First year with COVID-19: assessment and prospects. Geospat. Health. 2020;15(2) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blake A., Sinclair M.T. Tourism crisis management. Ann. Tour. Res. 2003;30(4):813–832. [Google Scholar]
  • Boluk K.A., Cavaliere C.T., Higgins-Desbiolles F. A critical framework for interrogating the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Agenda in tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2019;27(7):847–864. [Google Scholar]
  • Brewer M.B. The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2016;17(5):475–482. [Google Scholar]
  • Buckley R., Westaway D. Mental health rescue effects of women's outdoor tourism: a role in COVID-19 recovery. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020;85 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chopra K.K., Arora V.K. Covid-19 and social stigma: role of scientific community. Indian J. Tuberculosis. 2020;67(3):284–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cliff A., Haggett P. Time, travel and infection. Br. Med. Bull. 2004;69(1):87–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Colombo M.G., et al. How high-tech entrepreneurial ventures cope with the global crisis: changes in product innovation and internationalization strategies. Ind. Innov. 2016;23(7):647–671. [Google Scholar]
  • Crespí-Cladera R., Martín-Oliver A., Pascual-Fuster B. Financial distress in the hospitality industry during the Covid-19 disaster. Tour. Manag. 2021;85 [Google Scholar]
  • Cró S., Martins A.M. Structural breaks in international tourism demand: are they caused by crises or disasters? Tour. Manag. 2017;63:3–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cuomo M.T., et al. Digital transformation and tourist experience co-design: big social data for planning cultural tourism. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2021;162 [Google Scholar]
  • Dabwor D.T., Iorember P.T., Danjuma S.Yusuf. Stock market returns, globalization and economic growth in Nigeria: evidence from volatility and cointegrating analyses. J. Public Aff. 2020:e2393. n/a(n/a) [Google Scholar]
  • D'Amico F., Peyrin-Biroulet L., Danese S. Inflammatory bowel diseases and COVID-19: the invisible enemy. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(8):2302–2304. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Daye M., et al. Exploring local stakeholders’ views on the prospects of China's Belt & Road Initiative on tourism development in Kazakhstan. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019;23(15):1948–1962. [Google Scholar]
  • Duan W., Bu H., Chen Z. COVID-19-related stigma profiles and risk factors among people who are at high risk of contagion. Soc. Sci. Med. 2020;266 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Farzanegan M.R., et al. International tourism and outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19): a cross-country analysis. J. Travel Res. 2020 [Google Scholar]
  • Ferree K.E., et al. Stigma, trust, and procedural integrity: Covid-19 testing in Malawi. World Dev. 2021;141 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Firouraghi N., et al. A spatial database of colorectal cancer patients and potential nutritional risk factors in an urban area in the Middle East. BMC Res. Notes. 2020;13(1):466. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gosh*t G.G., et al. Asymmetric effects of monetary policy shocks on output growth in Nigeria: evidence from nonlinear ARDL and Hatemi-J causality tests. J. Public Affa. 2020:e2449. n/a(n/a) [Google Scholar]
  • Gössling S., Scott D., Hall C.M. Pandemics, tourism and global change: a rapid assessment of COVID-19. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020;29(1):1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Gretzel U., et al. e-Tourism beyond COVID-19: a call for transformative research. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2020;22(2):187–203. [Google Scholar]
  • Gulati G., Kelly B.D. Domestic violence against women and the COVID-19 pandemic: what is the role of psychiatry? Int. J. Law Psychiatry. 2020;71 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Halimi L., et al. Spatial analysis of colorectal cancer incidence in Hamadan Province, Iran: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy. 2019;13(2):293–303. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall C.M., Scott D., Gössling S. Pandemics, transformations and tourism: be careful what you wish for. Tour. Geogr. 2020;22(3):577–598. [Google Scholar]
  • Hao F., Xiao Q., Chon K. COVID-19 and China's hotel industry: impacts, a disaster management framework, and post-pandemic agenda. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020;90 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hilsenrath J. Global viral outbreaks like coronavirus, once rare, will become more common. Wall Street J. 2020;(6) [Google Scholar]
  • Hollingsworth T.D., Ferguson N.M., Anderson R.M. Will travel restrictions control the international spread of pandemic influenza? Nat. Med. 2006;12(5):497–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hu B., Zhang D. Channel selection and knowledge acquisition during the 2009 Beijing H1N1 flu crisis: a media system dependency theory perspective. Chin. J. Commun. 2014;7(3):299–318. [Google Scholar]
  • Im J., Kim J., Choeh J.Y. COVID-19, social distancing, and risk-averse actions of hospitality and tourism consumers: a case of South Korea. J. Destin. Market. Manag. 2021;20 [Google Scholar]
  • Ioannides D., Gyimóthy S. The COVID-19 crisis as an opportunity for escaping the unsustainable global tourism path. Tour. Geogr. 2020;22(3):624–632. [Google Scholar]
  • Iorember P., Usman O., Jelilov G. University Library of Munich; Germany: 2019. Asymmetric Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption, Trade Openness and Economic Growth on Environmental Quality in Nigeria and South Africa. [Google Scholar]
  • Iorember P.T., et al. The influence of renewable energy use, human capital, and trade on environmental quality in South Africa: multiple structural breaks cointegration approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021;28(11):13162–13174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Iorember P.T., Gosh*t G.G., Dabwor D.T. Testing the nexus between renewable energy consumption and environmental quality in Nigeria: the role of broad-based financial development. Afr. Dev. Rev. 2020;32(2):163–175. [Google Scholar]
  • Iorember P.T., Jelilov G. Computable general equilibrium analysis of increase in government agricultural expenditure on household welfare in Nigeria. Afr. Dev. Rev. 2018;30(4):362–371. [Google Scholar]
  • Jelilov G., et al. Testing the nexus between stock market returns and inflation in Nigeria: does the effect of COVID-19 pandemic matter? J. Public Aff. 2020;20(4):e2289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jimenez T., et al. Fatalism in the context of COVID-19: perceiving coronavirus as a death sentence predicts reluctance to perform recommended preventive behaviors. SSM Popul. Health. 2020;11 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones C.L., et al. The Health Belief Model as an explanatory framework in communication research: exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation. Health Commun. 2015;30(6):566–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Joo D., et al. Residents’ perceived risk, emotional solidarity, and support for tourism amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Destin. Market. Manag. 2021;19 [Google Scholar]
  • Jordan E.J., Moran C., Godwyll J.M. Does tourism really cause stress? A natural experiment utilizing ArcGIS Survey123. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021;24(1):1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Kallbekken S., Sælen H. Public support for air travel restrictions to address COVID-19 or climate change. Transp. Res. Part D. 2021;93 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Karl M., Muskat B., Ritchie B.W. Which travel risks are more salient for destination choice? An examination of the tourist's decision-making process. J. Destin. Market. Manag. 2020;18 [Google Scholar]
  • Khoo S.S., Toh W.X., Yang H. Seeking control during uncontrollable times: control abilities and religiosity predict stress during COVID-19. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021;175 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiani F., et al. Off-frequency listening in subjects with chronic tinnitus. Hear. Res. 2013;306:1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim J., Lee J.C. Effects of COVID-19 on preferences for private dining facilities in restaurants. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020;45:67–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuo H.-I., et al. Assessing impacts of SARS and Avian Flu on international tourism demand to Asia. Tour. Manag. 2008;29(5):917–928. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lange K.W. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and global mental health. Glob. Health J. 2021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Le D., Phi G. Strategic responses of the hotel sector to COVID-19: toward a refined pandemic crisis management framework. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021;94 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lebni J.Y., et al. A study of internet addiction and its effects on mental health: a study based on Iranian University Students. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2020;9:205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lebni J.Y., et al. Nurses' work-related quality of life and its influencing demographic factors at a public hospital in Western Iran: a cross-sectional study. Int. Q. Community Health Educ. 2020 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C.-C., Chen M.-P. Ecological footprint, tourism development, and country risk: international evidence. J. Cleaner Prod. 2021;279 [Google Scholar]
  • Lei K., Wen C., Wang X. Research on the coordinated development of tourism economy based on embedded dynamic data. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2021;82 [Google Scholar]
  • Lepp A., Gibson H. Tourist roles, perceived risk and international tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2003;30(3):606–624. [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y., et al. Seeking and sharing health information on social media: a net valence model and cross-cultural comparison. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2018;126:28–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Lin X., Kishore R. Social media-enabled healthcare: A conceptual model of social media affordances, online social support, and health behaviors and outcomes. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2021;166 [Google Scholar]
  • Lindberg K., Johnson R.L. The economic values of tourism's social impacts. Ann. Tour. Res. 1997;24(1):90–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Local Burden of Disease, H.I.V.C. Mapping subnational HIV mortality in six Latin American countries with incomplete vital registration systems. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lynch H., McDonagh C., Hennessy E. Social anxiety and depression stigma among adolescents. J. Affect. Disord. 2021;281:744–750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma D., Hu J., Yao F. Big data empowering low-carbon smart tourism study on low-carbon tourism O2O supply chain considering consumer behaviors and corporate altruistic preferences. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021;153 [Google Scholar]
  • Ma X., et al. Nouveauté or Cliché? Assessment on island ecological vulnerability to tourism: application to Zhoushan, China. Ecol. Indic. 2020;113 [Google Scholar]
  • MacIntyre C.R. Global spread of COVID-19 and pandemic potential. Glob. Biosecur. 2020;1(3) [Google Scholar]
  • Mamirkulova G., et al. New Silk Road infrastructure opportunities in developing tourism environment for residents better quality of life. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020;24:e01194. [Google Scholar]
  • Maqsood A., et al. The paradigm shift for educational system continuance in the advent of COVID-19 pandemic: mental health challenges and reflections. Curr. Res. Behav. Sci. 2021;2 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCabe S., Qiao G. A review of research into social tourism: launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on social tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020;85 [Google Scholar]
  • McKenna K.Y.A., Bargh J.A. Coming out in the age of the Internet: identity "demarginalization" through virtual group participation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998;75(3):681–694. [Google Scholar]
  • McKercher B., Chon K. The over-reaction to SARS and the collapse of Asian tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2004;31(3):716–719. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meadows C.W., et al. Unraveling public health crises across stages: understanding twitter emotions and message types during the California measles outbreak. Commun. Stud. 2019;70(4):453–469. [Google Scholar]
  • Mejia C., et al. Stigma & dirty work: in-group and out-group perceptions of essential service workers during COVID-19. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021;93 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Michael Hall C. Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tour. Manag. 2011;32(1):16–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Monmousseau P., et al. Impact of Covid-19 on passengers and airlines from passenger measurements: Managing customer satisfaction while putting the US Air Transportation System to sleep. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020;7 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moradi F., et al. Emotional intelligence and quality of life in elderly diabetic patients. Int. Q. Community Health Educ. 2020 272684X20965811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mubeen R., et al. The effects of market competition, capital structure, and CEO duality on firm performance: a mediation analysis by incorporating the GMM model technique. Sustainability. 2020;12(8) [Google Scholar]
  • Naslund J.A., et al. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 2016;25(2):113–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • NeJhaddadgar N., et al. Effectiveness of telephone-based screening and triage during COVID-19 outbreak in the promoted primary healthcare system: a case study in Ardabil province, Iran. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2020:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Neuburger L., Egger R. Travel risk perception and travel behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020: a case study of the DACH region. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020:1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Noman A.H.M., et al. The detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic violence against women. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2021;134:111–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Őri D., Molnár T., Szocsics P. Mental health-related stigma among psychiatrists in light of Covid-19. Asian J. Psychiatry. 2021;58 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Page S., Song H., Wu D.C. Assessing the impacts of the global economic crisis and swine flu on inbound tourism demand in the United Kingdom. J. Travel Res. 2011;51(2):142–153. [Google Scholar]
  • Park S., Boatwright B., Avery E.Johnson. Information channel preference in health crisis: exploring the roles of perceived risk, preparedness, knowledge, and intent to follow directives. Public Relat. Rev. 2019;45(5) [Google Scholar]
  • Perzow S.E.D., et al. Mental health of pregnant and postpartum women in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Affect. Disord. Rep. 2021;4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Piccinelli S., Moro S., Rita P. Air-travelers' concerns emerging from online comments during the COVID-19 outbreak. Tour. Manag. 2021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Piquero A.R., et al. Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis: domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Crim. Just. 2021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ransing R., et al. Infectious disease outbreak related stigma and discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic: drivers, facilitators, manifestations, and outcomes across the world. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;89:555–558. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rather R.A. Demystifying the effects of perceived risk and fear on customer engagement, co-creation and revisit intention during COVID-19: a protection motivation theory approach. J. Destin. Market. Manag. 2021;20 [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds B., W.S. M. Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. J. Health Commun. 2005;10(1):43–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Richter L.K. International tourism and its global public health consequences. J. Travel Res. 2016;41(4):340–347. [Google Scholar]
  • Ritchie B. Tourism disaster planning and management: from response and recovery to reduction and readiness. Curr. Issues Tour. 2008;11(4):315–348. [Google Scholar]
  • Sahoo S., et al. Lived experiences of the corona survivors (patients admitted in COVID wards): a narrative real-life documented summaries of internalized guilt, shame, stigma, anger. Asian J. Psychiatry. 2020;53 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saqib Z.A., et al. Physical activity is a medicine for non-communicable diseases: a survey study regarding the perception of physical activity impact on health wellbeing. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy. 2020;13:2949–2962. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarkar P., Debnath N., Reang D. Coupled human-environment system amid COVID-19 crisis: a conceptual model to understand the nexus. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;753 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scott N., Laws E. Tourism crises and disasters: enhancing understanding of system effects. J. Travel Tour. Market. 2008;19(2–3):149–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharifpour M., Walters G., Ritchie B.W. Risk perception, prior knowledge, and willingness to travel: investigating the Australian tourist market's risk perceptions towards the Middle East. J. Vacation Market. 2014;20(2):111–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Shuja K.H., et al. Letter to highlight the effects of isolation on elderly during COVID-19 outbreak. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2020;n/a(n/a) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sigala M. A market approach to social value co-creation: Findings and implications from “Mageires” the social restaurant. Market. Theory. 2018;19(1):27–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Sigala M. New technologies in tourism: from multi-disciplinary to anti-disciplinary advances and trajectories. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018;25:151–155. [Google Scholar]
  • Sigala M. Tourism and COVID-19: impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research. J. Bus. Res. 2020;117:312–321. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Silverio-Murillo A., et al. COVID-19 and women's health: examining changes in mental health and fertility. Econ. Lett. 2021;199 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh R., Subedi M. COVID-19 and stigma: social discrimination towards frontline healthcare providers and COVID-19 recovered patients in Nepal. Asian J. Psychiatry. 2020;53 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Škare M., Soriano D.R., Porada-Rochoń M. Impact of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2021;163 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su Z., et al. A race for a better understanding of COVID-19 vaccine non-adopters. Brain Behav. Immun. Health. 2020;9 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su Z., et al. Mental health consequences of COVID-19 media coverage: the need foreffective crisis communication practices. Glob. Health. 2021;17(1):4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su Z., McDonnell D., Cheshmehzangi A., Abbas J., Li X., Cai Y. The promise and perils of Unit 731 data to advance COVID-19 research. BMJ Glob. Health. 2021;6(4) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tambo E., et al. Early stage risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) strategies and measures against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis. Glob. Health J. 2021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tang Z., et al. Does government social media promote users' information security behavior towards COVID-19 scams? Cultivation effects and protective motivations. Govern. Inf. Q. 2021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tonsaker T., Bartlett G., Trpkov C. Health information on the Internet: gold mine or minefield? Can. Fam. Phys. 2014;60(5):407–408. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Turner-Musa J., Ajayi O., Kemp L. Examining social determinants of health, stigma, and COVID-19 disparities. Healthcare. 2020;8(2):168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • UNWTO, W. 2019 edition. UNWTO Madrid; Spain: 2019. International Tourism Highlights. [Google Scholar]
  • Usman O., et al. Modelling environmental degradation in South Africa: the effects of energy consumption, democracy, and globalization using innovation accounting tests. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020;27(8):8334–8349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Usman O., Iorember P.T., Olanipekun I.O. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019;26(13):13390–13400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang G., et al. Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet. 2020;395(10228):945–947. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Y.S. The impact of crisis events and macroeconomic activity on Taiwan's international inbound tourism demand. Tour. Manag. 2009;30(1):75–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Y.-S. The impact of crisis events and macroeconomic activity on Taiwan's international inbound tourism demand. Tour. Manag. 2009;30(1):75–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wen J., et al. Many brains are better than one: the importance of interdisciplinary studies on COVID-19 in and beyond tourism. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2020:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Wondirad A., Kebete Y., Li Y. Culinary tourism as a driver of regional economic development and socio-cultural revitalization: evidence from Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. J. Destin. Market. Manag. 2021;19 [Google Scholar]
  • Wong I.A., Ou J., Wilson A. Evolution of hoteliers’ organizational crisis communication in the time of mega disruption. Tour. Manag. 2021;84 [Google Scholar]
  • Wut T.M., Xu J., Wong S.-m. Crisis management research (1985–2020) in the hospitality and tourism industry: a review and research agenda. Tour. Manag. 2021;85 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoosefi Lebni J., et al. Challenges facing women survivors of self-immolation in the Kurdish regions of Iran: a qualitative study. Front. Psychiatry. 2020;11(778):778. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu Q., et al. Tourism boycotts and animosity: a study of seven events. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020;80 [Google Scholar]
  • Zeng Z., Chen P.-J., Lew A.A. From high-touch to high-tech: COVID-19 drives robotics adoption. Tour. Geogr. 2020;22(3):724–734. [Google Scholar]
  • Zenker S., Kock F. The coronavirus pandemic – a critical discussion of a tourism research agenda. Tour. Manag. 2020;81 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zheng D., Luo Q., Ritchie B.W. Afraid to travel after COVID-19? Self-protection, coping and resilience against pandemic ‘travel fear’ Tour. Manag. 2021;83 [Google Scholar]
  • Zhong B., Huang Y., Liu Q. Mental health toll from the coronavirus: social media usage reveals Wuhan residents' depression and secondary trauma in the COVID-19 outbreak. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021;114 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Research in Behavioral Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry (2024)

FAQs

What has been the impact of the coronavirus on the travel and tourism industry? ›

45 In 2020, amid the pandemic, U.S. travel and tourism exports declined to $84.3 billion, and declined slightly further in 2021 to $84.2 billion, making travel and tourism the ninth largest U.S. export by dollar value that year.

What are the impacts of Covid-19 pandemic to the tourism industry in the national capital region? ›

Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the Philippine Tourism industry. Given the travel restrictions and closure of businesses, 88% of the respondents expect losses of over 50% of their 2020 revenues.

How has COVID impacted sustainability? ›

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on almost all the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), leaving no country unaffected. It has caused a shift in political agendas, but also in lines of research. At the same time, the world is trying to make the transition to a more sustainable economic model.

How did COVID affect the economy? ›

The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated a devastatingly sharp contraction of economic activity and huge job losses in early 2020, as government restrictions and fear of the virus kept people at home and businesses shut.

What are the impacts of tourism? ›

In addition, tourism also brings employment opportunities, enhances the economy of the region, and creates revenue for the local government. Tourists also use public services, creating funding for public services, such as health, the police and the fire department, as well as increasing the demand for public transport.

How has COVID-19 affected sustainable development? ›

The COVID-19 pandemic has undermined the progress made on sustainable development. It poses a significant challenge to the full implementation of the 2030 Agenda as there has been a rise in extreme poverty, inequalities and injustice across the globe.

What was the biggest impact of COVID-19? ›

Key takeaways: The COVID-19 pandemic killed nearly 16 million people worldwide in 2020 and 2021 and caused global life expectancy to decline by 1.6 years between 2019 and 2020.

How does COVID-19 affect the environment? ›

The economic shutdown under the Covid-19 pandemic has had two monumental impacts on our environment. It has improved our air and water quality dramatically, and slashed our material consumption, water usage and waste production.

How has technology impacted tourism? ›

Algorithms and artificial intelligence help travel companies understand customer preferences, enabling them to offer tailored recommendations, such as suggesting destinations, hotels, or activities based on previous choices. This not only enhances the traveler's experience but also increases customer loyalty.

How was traveling during COVID? ›

One of the most noticeable manifestations is the changes in travel patterns. Due to restrictions on mobility, many industries, businesses, and households have been greatly affected. Global road transportation and aviation activities have dropped by an average of 50% during COVID-19 compared to 2019 (IEA, 2020).

What are the negative economic impacts of tourism? ›

One of the most significant negative economic impacts of tourism is the decline in traditional employment which happens when workers move from industries such as farming, mining and fishing into service jobs in the tourism industry.

What is the economic impact of tourism? ›

Tourism increases economic activity. The influx of tourists drives up local businesses' demand for services and products, creating jobs, increasing revenue, and reducing poverty. Direct benefits include those created by tourism-related activities such as accommodation, transport, and attractions.

Top Articles
Markets don't believe Powell- Look at Bitcoin's likely move in February
Bull and Bear Markets - Everything You Need To Know
Bubble Guppies Who's Gonna Play The Big Bad Wolf Dailymotion
Kreme Delite Menu
Craigslist Monterrey Ca
Nehemiah 4:1–23
Canary im Test: Ein All-in-One Überwachungssystem? - HouseControllers
Santa Clara College Confidential
Edible Arrangements Keller
Jasmine Put A Ring On It Age
Ree Marie Centerfold
Craigslist Alabama Montgomery
“In my day, you were butch or you were femme”
Flower Mound Clavicle Trauma
Vcuapi
Lax Arrivals Volaris
Bowie Tx Craigslist
Lima Funeral Home Bristol Ri Obituaries
Mills and Main Street Tour
Louisiana Sportsman Classifieds Guns
Star Wars: Héros de la Galaxie - le guide des meilleurs personnages en 2024 - Le Blog Allo Paradise
Mission Impossible 7 Showtimes Near Marcus Parkwood Cinema
G Switch Unblocked Tyrone
Abby's Caribbean Cafe
Is Windbound Multiplayer
Purdue 247 Football
Www.paystubportal.com/7-11 Login
Cable Cove Whale Watching
Yale College Confidential 2027
Summoners War Update Notes
Stickley Furniture
Ni Hao Kai Lan Rule 34
Heavenly Delusion Gif
Weapons Storehouse Nyt Crossword
Jewish Federation Of Greater Rochester
Planet Fitness Santa Clarita Photos
Qlima© Petroleumofen Elektronischer Laserofen SRE 9046 TC mit 4,7 KW CO2 Wächter • EUR 425,95
Anguilla Forum Tripadvisor
Joey Gentile Lpsg
John M. Oakey & Son Funeral Home And Crematory Obituaries
Reli Stocktwits
Wood River, IL Homes for Sale & Real Estate
Dineren en overnachten in Boutique Hotel The Church in Arnhem - Priya Loves Food & Travel
A Snowy Day In Oakland Showtimes Near Maya Pittsburg Cinemas
Divisadero Florist
Ret Paladin Phase 2 Bis Wotlk
Craigslist Yard Sales In Murrells Inlet
Saw X (2023) | Film, Trailer, Kritik
Volstate Portal
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Last Updated:

Views: 6084

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Birthday: 1999-09-15

Address: 8416 Beatty Center, Derekfort, VA 72092-0500

Phone: +6838967160603

Job: Mining Executive

Hobby: Woodworking, Knitting, Fishing, Coffee roasting, Kayaking, Horseback riding, Kite flying

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Refugio Daniel, I am a fine, precious, encouraging, calm, glamorous, vivacious, friendly person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.