A problem caused by transacting digital currency that involves the same tender being spent multiple times
Over 1.8 million professionals use CFI to learn accounting, financial analysis, modeling and more. Start with a free account to explore 20+ always-free courses and hundreds of finance templates and cheat sheets. Start Free
What is Double-Spending?
Double-spending is a problem that arises when transacting digital currency that involves the same tender being spent multiple times. Multiple transactions sharing the same input broadcasted on the network can be problematic and is a flaw unique to digital currencies. The primary reason for double-spending is that digital currency can be very easily reproduced.
Summary
- Double-spending is a problem that arises when transacting digital currency that involves the same tender is being spent multiple times.
- The primary reason for double-spending is that digital currency can be very easily reproduced.
- There are primarily two ways to combat double-spending – central clearing counterparty and blockchain.
How a Successful Double-Spending Attack is Administered
- Broadcast to the network a transaction where attacked merchant receives payment
- Secretly mine a branch that is built upon the block before the transaction, a transaction that pays the attacker
- Once the transaction to the merchant receives enough confirmations, and the merchant sends the product
- Continue the secret contradictory brand until it is longer than the public transaction, and then make the blocks public. The network will identify the secret branch to be valid because it is longer than the public block, and the payment to the merchant will be replaced by the payment to the attacker.
How to Combat Double-Spending?
Preventing double-spending involves a more strenuous verification process and ensures that the same input cannot be shared over multiple transactions. There are two primary ways to combat double-spending:
1. Centralized Clearing Counterparty
Centralization can potentially mitigate the inherent risk of double-spending in transacting digital currency. It is done by implementing a central and trusted third party to verify the transactions. The added entity would perform a function equivalent to central counterparty clearing.
In finance, central counterparties are often financial institutions that take on counterparty credit risk between two parties and ensure that a transaction clears. The services are commonly applied to facilitate the trading of financial derivative instruments.
2. Blockchain
Decentralized digital currencies, such as Bitcoin, utilize consensus mechanisms that verify transactions with certainty. The consensus mechanisms are alternatively known as proof-to-work. Practically, the mechanism ensures that each participant node verifies the transaction. Therefore, Bitcoin comes with a historical public ledger facilitated through blockchain that provides empirical verification of property rights and transfer.
In order for a market participant to fraudulently double spend, they will need to use a significant amount of computing power to eliminate the previous blocks in the chain, and effectively double-spend the transaction. Additionally, as time passes, confirmations of the block exponentially grow, further protecting the integrity of the transaction.
Challenges Associated with the Use of a Centralized Authority
One of the notable challenges of implementing a centralized authority is the creation and maintenance costs. Assigning a bank as a centralized authority will result in commission cuts on digital currency transactions. It can be expensive, especially in cases were more than two agents and/or banks are involved in the transfer, processing, and authenticating of funds being transferred.
Making Use of a Decentralized Approach
Double spending in decentralized systems is more challenging to resolve, as it requires maintaining a considerable number of servers storing identical and up-to-date copies of public transaction ledgers. However, transactions that are broadcasted may reach servers at varying times. A key component of a decentralized system approach is that validity is given to the initial transaction that is picked up or received by each of the servers.
Hence, in cases where a transaction is duplicated or the same token is used for payment, the duplicated transaction will be rendered invalid, as the servers will only validate the first transaction. However, once the servers become mismatched, the validation of true balances becomes nearly impossible. Such a drawback can be resolved by the use of a consensus algorithm, which syncs the various servers. Examples of such algorithms include the proof-of-stake and the proof-of-work consensus mechanisms.
Related Readings
CFI is the official provider of the Commercial Banking & Credit Analyst (CBCA)™ certification program, designed to transform anyone into a world-class financial analyst.
To keep learning and developing your knowledge of financial analysis, we highly recommend the additional resources below:
FAQs
Preventing Double Spending
The solution presented by Satoshi Nakamoto, which involved timestamping transactions and chaining them together using cryptographic techniques, solved the double-spending problem.
What is proof of work double-spending? ›
Proof of Work prevents double-spending on the blockchain by making it very hard and time-consuming for someone to create a fake transaction. Miners have to solve complex math problems, and this process takes a lot of computer power and energy.
What is the double-spending race condition? ›
Double spending occurs when a single currency unit is used multiple times. Various types of double spending attacks exist, including race attack, Finney attack, and 51% attack. Preventing double spending involves confirming transactions and implementing security measures like confirmations and timestamps.
How does 51 attack work? ›
A 51% attack is the unlikely event that a group will acquire more than 50% of the hashing power of a cryptocurrency network. These attacks happen on smaller crypto networks, but tend to fail on larger ones like Bitcoin because they are more secure.
How can you stop double-spending? ›
Centralization can potentially mitigate the inherent risk of double-spending in transacting digital currency. It is done by implementing a central and trusted third party to verify the transactions.
How do you detect double-spending? ›
Apart from blockchains, regular users can also be victims of double-spending. The main check is to wait for 6 block confirmations. The receiving parties can fall for Finney Attack and Race Attack by assuming that a transaction will go through when there are only one or two confirmations.
How does proof of work solve the problem of double-spending? ›
By incentivizing miners to verify the integrity of new crypto transactions before adding them to the distributed ledger that is blockchain, proof of work helps prevent double spending.
What is the double spend problem for physical cash? ›
In traditional transactions, a physical currency prevents spending the same money twice. In the digital realm, this becomes a challenge. The Double-spending problem arises when a digital currency is spent more than once, potentially leading to fraud and loss of trust in the system.
Is ADA proof of work? ›
Cardano (ADA) is a decentralized Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain designed to be more efficient than blockchains that rely on Proof-of-Work (PoW).
What is an example of a double spend? ›
What Is an Example of a Double Spend Problem? The most widely used example is an attack on a blockchain by an entity with more than 50% of the network's hashing power. This person or group could introduce an altered blockchain and spend the same tokens more than once.
Proof of work and proof of stake are systems that choose who gets to update a blockchain. Proof of work chooses the updater through competition. Proof of stake chooses them via a lottery-like system.
What industries are most likely to be disrupted by smart contracts? ›
Blockchain technology's potential for disrupting industries is vast and far-reaching. From finance and banking to supply chain management, healthcare, and intellectual property rights, blockchain offers solutions to long-standing challenges while introducing new levels of efficiency, transparency, and security.
What is a goldfinger attack? ›
Goldfinger attack
This is known as a 51% attack (it enables you to double spend at will for example). When the motivation is not to profit directly through Bitcoin, but instead to bring down the currency or network, it is called a Goldfinger attack.
What is the 51 rule in blockchain? ›
A 51% attack is an attack on a blockchain network where a single entity gains control of more than half (51%) of its staking or computational power.
What is blockchain proof of work? ›
Proof of work is a consensus mechanism used by many cryptocurrencies to validate transactions on their blockchains and award tokens for participating in the network.
How do banks prevent double-spending? ›
Trusted Third Parties
In order to prevent fraudulent transactions such as double spends, certain institutions are entrusted to verify all transactions privately. These institutions include payment processors, banks, Automated Clearing Houses, and ultimately central banks.
How does the quorum driver help prevent double-spending in Sui? ›
If all the validity checks pass, the validator then attempts to lock all the owned input objects to the given transaction digest. This ensures each owned input object can only be used by one transaction at a time and is the way that Sui prevents double-spending.
What is the proof of stake consensus mechanism? ›
Proof-of-stake is a blockchain consensus mechanism for processing transactions and creating new blocks. A consensus mechanism is a method for validating entries into a distributed database and keeping the database secure.
What was the block reward after the first Bitcoin halving in 2012? ›
First halving: November 28, 2012
The first Bitcoin halving occurred when the block reward was reduced from 50 Bitcoins per block to 25 Bitcoins. This event marked the beginning of Bitcoin's journey as a deflationary asset.
