Cryptosporidium Infection: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Differential Diagnosis (2024)

Abstract

Cryptosporidium is a protozoan that infects a wide variety of vertebrates, including humans, causing acute gastroenteritis. The disease manifests with abdominal pain and diarrhea similar to that of choleric infection. In the immunocompromised hosts, the parasite causes prolonged infections that can also be fatal. For this reason, cryptosporidiosis is considered one of riskiest opportunistic infections for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The best way to control the infection in these patients is setting up sensitive and specific diagnostic tests for epidemiological surveillance and morbidity reduction. Here, we summarized the general aspects of Cryptosporidium infection focusing on available diagnostic tools used for the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis. Molecular methods currently available for its detection and progress in the development of new diagnostics for cryptosporidiosis are also discussed.

Keywords: protozoan parasite, severe diarrhea, immunocompromised patients, differential diagnosis, molecular techniques

Introduction

Cryptosporidiosis is a worldwide infection caused by the protozoan Cryptosporidium, a parasite that infects many species of vertebrates, including humans, causing acute gastroenteritis, abdominal pain, and diarrhea [1]. Cryptosporidiosis is transmitted primarily through the fecal–oral route, i.e., by ingesting viable oocysts of animal and/or human origin, emitted with feces that contaminated food or water [2, 3]. Although the waterborne transmission of infectious pathogen is well documented, neither the natural reservoir nor the exact infection route of cryptosporidia is well-known [4].

Cryptosporidium was first discovered by Tyzzer in 1907 [5], but for a longtime, it was thought to be a non-pathogenic parasite. Only since 1976, it was recognized as an opportunistic pathogenic parasite, when 2 human cases of cryptosporidiosis were reported to be associated with diarrhea [6, 7]. However, Cryptosporidium remained unknown as a significant human pathogen of acute diarrhea disease until 1982, when it was recognized as a causative agent of self-limiting diarrhea for the general population and a life-threatening disease for immunocompromised persons such as those receiving immunosuppressive agents and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients [4, 8, 9].

The parasite completes its life cycle within a single host (monoxen cycle), alternating asexual and sexual reproduction [3, 5]. Although more than 30 species have been included in the genus Cryptosporidium, only 2 species, namely, Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis, commonly infect humans [10–12]. C. parvum is responsible for most cattle infections, and consequently, it is considered to be responsible for most zoonotic infections in humans [10]. Cryptosporidium spp. exhibit little host specificity, and different members of this genus have been reported to infect multiple hosts, such as mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, and fish [13, 14]. The intracellular protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium is a human and veterinary pathogen – a member of the phylum Apicomplexa that include other pathogens such as Plasmodium spp., Eimeria spp., Neospora, Babesia, and Theileria [15]. However, in contrast to other parasitic protozoa of this phylum, such as Toxoplasma gondii or Plasmodium falciparum, the species of the genus Cryptosporidium cannot be cultivated in vitro [16]. Since there is no vaccine commercially available to prevent Cryptosporidium infection, and these parasites have certain characteristics that make them highly contagious (i.e., survival in the environment for a long time and resistance to chlorine-based disinfectants), the only way to avoid the spreading of the parasite to other people is the introduction of preventive measures to control the transmission of the germs that are shed in feces [12]. These precautions are especially important for people with weakened immune systems [17].

Life Cycle and Epidemiology

Infection is initiated by ingestion of oocysts, each of which contains 4 sporozoites that hatch at the intestinal level, releasing infectious sporozoites [3, 5]. After excystation, these sporozoites are ingested into a modified host membrane separated from the cytoplasm by a dense layer; then, the location of parasites within the host is not intracellular but extracytoplasmic [18]. Within the parasitophorous vacuole, the parasite undergoes asexual or schizogony reproduction, leading to the production of 8 merozoites within a type I meront [19]. The merozoites can invade the neighboring epithelial cells and propagate the infection to other sites of the intestines. During this stage, the merozoites can undergo 2 distinct replicative cycles: an asexual stage characterized by multiplication of merozoites (type I meront) and production of thin-walled oocysts that autoinfect the host and/or a sexual stage with formation of type II meront, which, after differentiation in microgametocytes and macrogametocytes, will unite to form the zygote [3]. The diploid zygote, through a process called sporogony, will form 4 sporozoites within thick or thin-walled oocysts. The thick-walled oocyst, protected by a resistant wall, after releasing in the feces is shed into the environment, ready to infect a new individual (Figure 1) [19, 20].

Although the number of worldwide reported cases of cryptosporidiosis in the last years is increased with a number of 3 cases per 100,000 population, numerous indicators (i.e., clinical symptoms) indicate that the frequency of infection is likely to be 100-fold higher than the number of reported cases [21]. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection is significantly lower in industrialized countries compared to developing countries since, in the latter, there are many people that still lack a basic level of drinking water and sanitation [22, 23]. In developing countries, cryptosporidiosis is rarely reported in immunocompetent persons, while this infection causes approximately 10–15% of cases of severe diarrheal illness mostly in malnourished children less than five years old [22, 23]. Cryptosporidium spp. have been isolated worldwide, and outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis associated with swimming pool or contaminated drinking water have been reported in several countries [24, 25]. Although there are more than 30 species of Cryptosporidium, only few species like C. hominis, C. parvum, C. meleagridis, C. felis, and C. canis are commonly found in people [10, 26, 27]. Among these species, C. hominis and C. parvum are most frequently found in intestinal infections in humans, although they differ in host range, with the former that infects exclusively humans, while the latter has an infectious cycle involving humans and ruminants, and thereby, usually C. parvum infects people who have close contact with large numbers of animals [28–30]. Although the transmission from animals is possible, it is very uncommon, and Cryptosporidium infection transmitted from sheep, horses, goats, and rodents has been rarely reported [12, 30, 31]. C. canis and C. felis, the dog- and the cat-adapted species, respectively, have been reported to cause infection in individuals without being sick at all [21, 30]. However, human infections with Cryptosporidium species from pets are very rare [10, 14].

Pathogenesis

In immunocompetent persons, Cryptosporidium infection usually produces a bout of watery diarrhea, although the infection in some persons may not lead to the symptoms [4, 23, 32]. The disease is likely underestimated, since the diarrhea usually resolves without any treatment [19]. Although even people who do not have direct contact with animals may be infected, those who have direct contact with infected animals (particularly calves) or swallow pool water or drink untreated water are at a higher risk of contracting cryptosporidiosis [22, 24, 25]. Cryptosporidium infections are also more common in individuals who are in poor health or who have weakened immune systems (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/ AIDS, cancer, and transplant patients) [19, 33–35]. Between the parasites that caused about 1 million deaths every year, cryptosporidiosis resulted in over 50,000 deaths [36, 37]. Moreover, Cryptosporidium is one of the most important protozoan pathogen that cause waterborne outbreaks worldwide [19, 32, 38]. Cryptosporidium lives in the intestines of the infected individuals and animals in the form of oocysts, which will be released in the feces [19]. After infection, the parasite alters the function of the intestinal barrier, increasing its permeability, absorption, and secretion of fluid and electrolytes, and thereby, the severity, persistence, and outcome of the infection depend on the degree of the immunocompromised status [39, 40]. The oocysts are very resistant to chlorine, chloramines, and chlorine dioxide, which are commonly used in methods of water system disinfection, and remain vital for infection in the environment for a long time [21]. Humans become infected with Cryptosporidium by touching anything that has come in contact with contaminated feces, although the most common mode of transmission is represented by ingestion of oocysts in contaminated food and water or air [21, 40].

Recent studies indicate that cryptosporidiosis may be transmitted by inhalation of aerosolized droplets via respiratory secretions or by coughing, in addition to the well-documented fecal–oral transmission [41]. Pulmonary infections also have been reported [41, 42].

Immunocompromised hosts are more susceptible to infection than people with a healthy immune system, and in the subjects with HIV/AIDS, the parasite often causes a chronic, prolonged form of a disease, which is difficult to treat and can even result in death [37]. In these patients, fever and malabsorption are common, and the parasite can cause inflammatory disease of the biliary tree leading to biliary tract obstruction, sclerosing cholangitis, papillary stenosis, and pancreatitis [33, 37]. For this reason, cryptosporidiosis is considered one of the riskiest opportunistic infections for patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome [37].

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is usually made by microscopic detection of the parasite oocysts, oocyst antigens, or oocyst DNA in stool samples. Since the most common symptom of cryptosporidiosis is a watery diarrhea, the differential diagnosis for Cryptosporidium includes bacterial, viral, and parasitic enteric pathogens associated with acute diarrhea such as rotaviruses, coronaviruses, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella spp. [43, 44]. However, gastrointestinal disorders may also have noninfectious causes, such as inflammatory bowel disease in humans [45].

Diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is usually made by microscopically identifying the presence of oocysts of 4 to 6 μm in diameter in the stool of the infected subjects [44, 46]. However, since the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts can be difficult, three fecal samples collected on separate days should be microscopically examined for detection of oocysts prior to exclude a Cryptosporidium infection in subjects with severe diarrhea [44, 45]. In addition, for detection of oocysts in stool, sample must be concentrated using the formalin-ether sedimentation method prior to microscopic examination [47]. The oocysts of Cryptosporidium can be also observed by acid-fast (modified Ziehl–Neelsen method) or phenol–auramine staining on unconcentrated fecal smears, where the oocysts stain red and bright yellow, respectively [44, 45]. However, much attention should be given to this staining since the oocysts may also appear as “ghost” cells [48]. In addition, although the oocysts of Cryptosporidium are half the size of those of Cyclospora cayetanensis (about 4–5 μm in diameter vs. 9–10 μm in diameter), another coccidian protozoan parasite that infects the intestine of humans causing acute diarrhea, much attention should be given when evaluating stool samples since the oocysts of both parasites are autofluorescent and acid-fast (Figure 2) [46, 47]. In addition, although C. cayetanensis has a life cycle similar to Cryptosporidium, its oocysts are unsporulated and not infective when shed in the feces, and thereby, direct fecal–oral transmission cannot occur [46].

Although routine diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is generally made by the microscopic identification of oocysts in fecal smears, this method, despite being easy to use and low cost, unfortunately has a low sensitivity (≤ 30%). Moreover, accurate diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis using this technique is largely dependent on the experience of the microscopist.

Sensitivity can be improved by performing modified acid-fast stain, a staining generally performed if there are structures suspicious for Cryptosporidium, which has been reported to be associated with a sensitivity of 55%. However, these methods cannot distinguish between Cryptosporidium species [49, 50]. In addition to the above described methods, watery or mushy stools can be examined for the laboratory diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis using different techniques such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunochromatographic test, which have good sensitivity and specificity for detection of Cryptosporidium antigens [51–53].

Although the commercial kits have a range of sensitivities and specificities higher than that of the microscopic methods (ranging from 58 to 95%), previous studies have shown that these antigen/antibody-based detection methods are also ineffective if the burden of this parasite in the patients is below the minimum threshold [53]. In addition, these methods are more expensive than polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is now accepted in most laboratories as the gold standard for the detection of this parasite in the stool. Previous studies have shown that compared to PCR, microscopy, ELISA, and immunochromatographic test (ICT) are less convenient in terms of cost, sensitivity, and specificity and also are more time consuming [54–56]. Although there have been important advances in diagnostic tools (i.e., the availability of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of intestinal protozoa), the accessibility to this molecular technique is limited in some labs and totally absent in others. In addition, the expense and requirement for technical expertise have limited their use particularly in high-prevalence regions such as developing countries.

Conclusion

Despite the global prevalence and the high impact of cryptosporidiosis, principally in immunocompromised patients, major deficiencies exist in the current control programs, especially in terms of available diagnostic tools. In addition, most common diagnostic tests tend to misdiagnose the disease in endemic areas. In particular, microscopic techniques are the most widely used method for detection of cryptosporidia in stool samples, and the diagnostic accuracy of these methods is largely dependent on the experience of the microscopist.

Since early diagnosis is the best way to fight the infection, there is a need to develop molecular techniques that are sensitive, specific, easy to perform, cost-effective, and high-throughput.

Footnotes

References