Choosing Polygon over Ethereum to Build Efficient dApps (2024)

Polygon aims to give people numerous choices when they create dApp on Polygon. Some developers keep security over speed while others compromise on security for lowered fees and speed – the technology is building multiple Ethereum-centric scaling solutions to address all these different features.

Ethereum has remained a pillar in the cryptocurrency space. Right from DeFi to smart contracts and even NFTs, Ethereum has remained one of the key innovations of Web3. However, inspite of the glaring success, the technology has struggled with massive network congestion, high network fees, and lowering transaction throughput – factors that have created a scope for newer crypto projects coming in to scale it. Polygon is one such project.

Originated in 2017, India-based software company Polygon Technology scales Ethereum without sacrificing on its decentralization benefits. With the number of dApps on Polygon having reached 53,000, businesses are using the technology’s low fees and fast speed to build Ethereum-powered dApps.

In this article, we are going to look into the different facets of Polygon and what makes the technology better than using Ethereum for dApps development.

Choosing Polygon over Ethereum to Build Efficient dApps (1)

How does the Polygon dApp builder work?

Polygon is a Layer 2 scaling solution that enables developers to build dApps on Ethereum without getting stuck with Ethereum’s limitations.

How it does that is by developing a layer 2 solution using off-chain on-chain concepts and different governance models like Proof of Stake, which helps the network lower its energy footprint by 99.95% – one which Etherum has also reached after The Merge. In addition to using a PoS architecture where the network participants stake MATIC for validating the transactions, Polygon enables developers to use its open source SDK to launch their Polygon dApp at the back of multiple scaling techniques:

ZK-Rollups: The ethereum-based technology acquired a zero-knowledge (ZK) protocol developer, Mir, for USD 400 million. What this protocol does is it enables transaction authenticators to validate the encrypted data without actually accessing the information enabling them to generate the verification proof in under 170 milliseconds.

Optimistic Rollups: It consists of bundling several off-chain transactions into massive batches before submitting them in Ethereum. This way, the fixed costs get spread across multiple transactions that reduce the end-user fees. In essence, this scaling technique assumes off-chain transactions validity without pushing out validity proofs for the on-chain transaction batches by following a fraud-proving methodology to identify transactions having discrepancies.

Plasma Chains: This scaling technique builds a child-parent relationship in Ethereum’s main chain. For example, the plasma chains can deploy their own dApps on Polygon which comes in handy when the other sidechains get hacked or are down. Additionally, the plasma chains tend to deliver off-chain transactions at higher efficiency levels.

At the back of these scaling methods, while the answer to how much time does it take to build dApp on Polygon is same as that on Ethereum or other blockchain technology, the transaction speed and cost difference is unmatched.

Features of Polygon for dApp development

The technology merges the capabilities of sovereign blockchains and Ethereum into an attractive feature set that helps developers build a decentralized app on Polygon that is highly efficient, scalable, and speedy.

Ethereum compatibility

When you build dApp on Polygon you work on a platform with complete Ethereum compatibility to tech stack, languages, standards, and tools.

High scalability

The technology is built on dedicated blockchains, a scalable consensus algorithm, and a customized Wasm execution environment.

Competitive network Greater security

Polygon dApp development is built on a modular “security as a service” facility offered either by Ethereum or a pool or validators.

Interoperability

The technology comes with a native support for the arbitrary messaging passing bridges for external systems and can easily connect with Ethereum main chain using the bridging SDKs polygon offers.

Good user experience

When you build dApp on Polygon it is very similar to one on Web2 purely at the back of a facility like instantaneous transaction finality.

Modularity

Polygon comes with high extensibility, customization, upgradability, community collaboration, and a short time-to-market.

These features of Polygon for dApp development are designed to bring the technology at par with the adoption of Ethereum minus all the limitations of the latter. This makes it profitable for developers and enterprises alike to build a decentralized app on Polygon.

Amidst these feature sets and the obvious benefits of Polygon for dApp development, is it time to let go of Ethereum? And on a technological level, what difference does Ethereum hold from Polygon dApp development?

Creating dApps on Polygon vs Ethereum

While The Merge moved Ethereum from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, bringing down its 112 TWh of energy consumption down to 0.01 TWh, the technology is where Polygon already is.

Choosing Polygon over Ethereum to Build Efficient dApps (2)

The Merge however, didn’t change the high variable transaction cost that Ethereum comes with – a factor that Polygon addresses on a massive extent. In addition to this, the transaction processing speed has also remained unchanged, which in case of Polygon dApps development is only 65,000 transactions per second at the back of the Layer 2 scalability solution.

Let us look into the differences to understand why it makes sense to build dApps on Polygon.

FactorsEthereumPolygon
Foundation20132017
Scalability10 TPS7000
Market Cap139.56 Billion7.698 Billion
Average transaction fees0.4876US$0.01
Programming languageSoliditySolidity, Golang, Vyper
Transaction Deterministic FinalityInstant5 minutes
Total dApps297053,000

While Polygon’s popularity is on a fast rise, there are some issues that are still prevalent in the technology. For understanding Polygon to its entirety, it is critical to know the limitations it comes attached with. Let us give a brief look at them:

  • Ethereum Dependency: Ethereum lies at the center of Polygon’s ecosystem as its settlement layer. This has resulted in Polygon being completely dependent on Ethereum for its operations.
  • Under Development: Presently, Polygon comes with Matic POS Chains and Matic Plasma as scaling solutions. Other scaling solutions such as Optimistic Rollups, zk Rollups, Sidechains, Validum Chains, and Enterprise Chains, etc. are still in their developmental stages with an unsurety around when they would be live.
  • Matic Plasma Chains: Polygon plasma chains can only be used for a limited set of use cases. Comparatively, POS Chains are a lot more famous since they offer greater user experiences and flexibility when compared to Matic Plasma.
  • Competition: There are a number of scaling solutions such as Solana, Cosmos, Polkadot, etc. which are gaining steady momentum. They are making use of Ethereum and other blockchains to offer better user experience. Amidst this, we might see other solutions coming up and taking Polygon’s market share.

With everything we have covered up until this point, one thing is clear – even though the technology has some limitations which need to be addressed, the benefits of Polygon for dApp development are unignorable. However, for an entrepreneur what is necessary is to know the use cases on which they can create dApp on Polygon.

The use cases to build dApp on Polygon

The biggest reason why dApp development service providers like Appinventiv choose Polygon is the fact that the end product is the same as what results from Ethereum app development but the customer experience is much greater. So while the businesses get the same Ethereum-powered app, their users get an innovative user experience, higher lowered transaction speed, and minimal transaction fees.

Payments: Polygon platform is engineered to create dApps that speed up the payment process, powering almost real-time payment settlement via specialized API and SDK integration. This enables apps, users, and merchants to instantly perform transactions through multiple cryptocurrencies, usually through the ETH or ERC-20 tokens. This system is being rolled out in three distinct phases: 1. ERC-20 token payments 2. Token transfer in cross-chain 3. Fiat-based payment models.

Lending Platform: The next use case to consider when you build dApp on Polygon is creating a module that would enable lenders to analyze users credit ratings and building a smart contract that would automate the loan disbursem*nt journey.

Games: The Layer 2 sidechain scaling solution of Polygon makes blockchain-based gaming platform development efficient and fast. With Ethereum and Polygon working together, the platform will be able to address the lag issues that non-Polygon blockchain games face.

Other Use Cases: There are a range of other use cases to consider when you build a decentralized app on Polygon such as enabling fast settlement times required for decentralized exchanges to provide faster and cheaper trading.

[Also Read: How to monetize with your dApp?]

Amidst these use cases, the Polygon ecosystem is fast expanding. Here’s a look into some of the top applications that are a part of the network

Choosing Polygon over Ethereum to Build Efficient dApps (4)

Additionally, most of the dApps require a method to sign transactions without submitting in the users’ private keys details. On the back of its scalability enhancements, the technology helps in enabling an open identity framework for the dApp, thus solving the privacy issue.

These use cases are only a surface-level explanation of why businesses should develop dApp on Polygon. There are a range of other applications that can be built on Polygon.

Ultimately, even though Polygon dApps are built upon Ethereum, there are some very critical differences between them, specifically in transaction speed and cost. Such costly gas fees and slow transactions can lead to poor user experience that would leave a negative impact on the platform’s adoption. On this note, it makes better business sense to select Polygon, thanks to its ability to back faster transactions and lowered gas fees.

At Appinventiv, it is our constant endeavor to think about our clients’ customers first and this is the reason why we make dApp on Polygon. Using the technology we have built a range of decentralized apps right from a crypto wallet app to a DeFi exchange all promising a positive customer experience.

Looking to explore the technology for your next dApp project? Get in touch with our blockchain experts.

Choosing Polygon over Ethereum to Build Efficient dApps (5)

THE AUTHOR

Chirag Bhardwaj

Blockchain Evangelist

Prev PostNext Post

Choosing Polygon over Ethereum to Build Efficient dApps (2024)

FAQs

Choosing Polygon over Ethereum to Build Efficient dApps? ›

Polygon comes with high extensibility, customization, upgradability, community collaboration, and a short time-to-market. These features of Polygon for dApp development are designed to bring the technology at par with the adoption of Ethereum minus all the limitations of the latter.

Why choose Polygon over Ethereum? ›

As a venue for processing transactions, Polygon is often preferred over Ethereum for lower-value applications because the gas fees are lower. As a proof-of-stake sidechain, Polygon can quickly process "batches" of transactions, resulting in lower fees.

What is the best blockchain to build dApps? ›

Ethereum. Ethereum is the home to thousands of dApps, blockchain games, social media protocols, and more. The blockchain also introduced smart contracts — the programmability engines of blockchain. And till date, Ethereum remains the largest blockchain in terms of user and developer activity.

How does Polygon enable faster and cheaper transactions on the Ethereum network? ›

Polygon is a technology that helps Ethereum to be faster and less heavy by grouping transactions off the main blockchain. Through Zk rollups, groups of transactions are processed off-chain, and validity proofs are created before being sent to the main blockchain. This reduces the amount of data on the main chain.

How much faster is Polygon than Ethereum? ›

As mentioned above, the Ethereum Network is only capable of processing around 27 transactions per second. Polygon, on the other hand, leveraging its network of far less-congested sidechains, is able to process around 7,000 transactions per second.

Should I build on Ethereum or Polygon? ›

Ultimately, even though Polygon dApps are built upon Ethereum, there are some very critical differences between them, specifically in transaction speed and cost. Such costly gas fees and slow transactions can lead to poor user experience that would leave a negative impact on the platform's adoption.

Why choose Polygon? ›

Cost Efficiency: Polygon significantly reduces transaction costs compared to Ethereum, making it a cost-effective choice for both developers and users. This economic advantage allows projects to scale without incurring high fees.

How do I choose which blockchain to build on? ›

By assessing each platform's infrastructure tradeoffs, user engagement, costs, developer ecosystem, and interoperability, you can choose a blockchain that aligns with your project's goals and sets you up for long term success.

Which chain has the most dApps? ›

Many in the industry still regard this blockchain network as the undisputed leader of the DApp world. However, there is one blockchain that by now has more DApps, more network addresses, and more transaction volumes than Ethereum, and that network is the BNB Chain (BNB).

Which blockchain is known for its programmability and support for dApps? ›

The Ethereum platform has seen widespread adoption by technologists who build decentralized applications, or dApps, on the Ethereum network. For example, there are numerous platforms and exchanges for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) -- a type of digital asset that can be exchanged on a blockchain.

Is it better to mint on Polygon or Ethereum? ›

Understanding Polygon and its role in NFTs

Most NFTs trade on Ethereum-based platforms. However, Ethereum has a crowded network, resulting in slow processing speed. Polygon fills in the gap with its lower cost and efficient network.

Are Polygon fees lower than Ethereum? ›

Scalability: Polygon uses a network of side chains to offload transactions from the main Ethereum chain, allowing faster transaction speeds. Low transaction costs: Polygon boasts significantly lower transaction costs than Ethereum.

Is Polygon less secure than Ethereum? ›

Ethereum uses the PoW consensus mechanism, and Polygon uses the PoS consensus mechanism. Generally, the PoS is considered more secure than PoW because it reduces the risk of %51 attacks. However, after the upgrade, Ethereum 2.0 will use the PoS mechanism and become more secure than it is now.

Why Polygon over Ethereum? ›

Polygon can validate transactions quicker than Ethereum; handling up to 700 transactions per second compared to Ethereum's average of 10. It charges much lower gas fees as a result; around $0.01 per trade compared to the average fee of $14 on Ethereum for a trade on Uniswap v3 in 2022.

Is MATIC better than Ethereum? ›

The native token for Polygon is 'Matic', which was the network's original name before it was changed to Polygon. Because of its side-chain status, Polygon is less secure in nature than Ethereum. It also lacks Ethereum's wide adaptability.

What is the best bridge for ETH to Polygon? ›

Wormhole. Known as the best Polygon to ETH bridge, Wormhole platform is not a cross-chain bridge itself. It is a messaging protocol that supports development and operations of on-chain bridge systems between heterogeneous decentralized networks.

Does Polygon compete with Ethereum? ›

Polygon and Ethereum are both decentralized blockchains. Developers can build dApps on both blockchains effortlessly. Although Polygon is faster and more scalable than Ethereum now, the next generation of Ethereum (ETH 2.0) can compete with Polygon in case of speed and scalability. Innovation.

Why is Polygon a good investment? ›

Polygon (MATIC) is a Layer-2 scaling solution that's emerged to provide faster transactions and lower costs for users. It remains one of the strongest Ethereum competitors, mostly due to its better scalability and lower fees.

Top Articles
What is Iron Butterfly Option? Definition of Iron Butterfly Option, Iron Butterfly Option Meaning - The Economic Times
How Long Do I Have to Respond to an Offer on my House?
Uti Hvacr
Goodbye Horses: The Many Lives of Q Lazzarus
How To Be A Reseller: Heather Hooks Is Hooked On Pickin’ - Seeking Connection: Life Is Like A Crossword Puzzle
Evil Dead Rise Showtimes Near Massena Movieplex
Wmlink/Sspr
Legacy First National Bank
How Much Is Tj Maxx Starting Pay
Accuradio Unblocked
Hair Love Salon Bradley Beach
Nyuonsite
Nba Rotogrinders Starting Lineups
10-Day Weather Forecast for Florence, AL - The Weather Channel | weather.com
[Birthday Column] Celebrating Sarada's Birthday on 3/31! Looking Back on the Successor to the Uchiha Legacy Who Dreams of Becoming Hokage! | NARUTO OFFICIAL SITE (NARUTO & BORUTO)
Eva Mastromatteo Erie Pa
How To Cancel Goodnotes Subscription
The Grand Canyon main water line has broken dozens of times. Why is it getting a major fix only now?
Walgreens San Pedro And Hildebrand
Kp Nurse Scholars
Richland Ecampus
Soulstone Survivors Igg
Home
Asteroid City Showtimes Near Violet Crown Charlottesville
Macu Heloc Rate
Walmart Pharmacy Near Me Open
2004 Honda Odyssey Firing Order
Www.1Tamilmv.con
Rek Funerals
Ezstub Cross Country
Egg Crutch Glove Envelope
Lehpiht Shop
Ma Scratch Tickets Codes
Texas Baseball Officially Releases 2023 Schedule
Vanessa West Tripod Jeffrey Dahmer
Metra Schedule Ravinia To Chicago
Google Chrome-webbrowser
Craiglist Hollywood
Cranston Sewer Tax
Vons Credit Union Routing Number
The best specialist spirits store | Spirituosengalerie Stuttgart
Lyndie Irons And Pat Tenore
How Big Is 776 000 Acres On A Map
Random Animal Hybrid Generator Wheel
How to Connect Jabra Earbuds to an iPhone | Decortweaks
Uno Grade Scale
Dmv Kiosk Bakersfield
Estes4Me Payroll
Tenichtop
Craigslist Yard Sales In Murrells Inlet
Syrie Funeral Home Obituary
Qvc Com Blogs
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Neely Ledner

Last Updated:

Views: 6108

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (42 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Neely Ledner

Birthday: 1998-06-09

Address: 443 Barrows Terrace, New Jodyberg, CO 57462-5329

Phone: +2433516856029

Job: Central Legal Facilitator

Hobby: Backpacking, Jogging, Magic, Driving, Macrame, Embroidery, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Neely Ledner, I am a bright, determined, beautiful, adventurous, adventurous, spotless, calm person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.