Budget to Actuals Variance Analysis is Key For Project Success (2024)

To deliver a product or service within a specified time and budget you have to juggle a variety of activities, responsibilities, and stakeholders. Estimating the project’s cost and keeping tabs on actual spending are two crucial aspects for project managers. Budget to actual variance analysis is the comparison of the budgeted and the actual cost of the project as it progresses.

What is a budget?

Budgeting involves financial planning and creating an estimate of the associated project costs. That could include costs like materials, labor costs, equipment, and overhead and then comparing these estimates to the amount of funding available. This ensures the project can be completed within the available time and financial constraints.

Budget is also an essential tool for both project managers and finance teams to assess the financial viability of a project. It helps identify potential cost overruns before they occur. This ensures efficient and effective use of resources.

Example:

Let’s say we are working with a company in technology business operations among other high growth companies. And we are looking at a mobile application development project. We have a team of four people working on this project, including a project manager, a frontend developer, a backend developer, and a designer. Let’s say this is a six-month project.

We can do some rough financial modeling and come up with an estimate of the time each team member will spend on this project.

The hourly rate for each of the roles is as below:

By multiplying the estimated hours with the hourly rate, we come up with the budgeted cost for the project as below.

In the above example, the estimated or budgeted cost of the project is roughly ~$50K.

What are actual and budget to actual variance analysis?

Actual are the costs spent on a project as it progresses. It measures the real cost of the project. While doing the budget vs. actual variance analysis, we can then compare the budget to the real cost to see if the project is on track. In the above example, the team ultimately spent more time than anticipated on several roles.

Did you know that Beebole has its own Microsoft Excel add-in and Google Sheets add-on that you can use to streamline this process? With Beebole you can capture the actuals with the final cost and compare that to what was originally planned. Incorporate this data directly into Excel or Google Sheets and you can easily tackle the budget vs. actual analysis.

Budget to actual variance analysis comes in handy when you need to understand how or why your budget is off. For example: The hourly rates you’d budgeted for have changed. Instead of what was estimated above, take a look at what the real hourly rates turned out to be:

Next, let’s calculate the actual amount spent on the project at the end of the six months. By multiplying the actual hours with the actual rate, we get the actual cost for the project as shown below.

In the above example, the actual cost of the project is roughly ~$56.6K, which is obviously a different number than the budgeted $50k.

What is a budget variance?

A budget variance is the difference between the budgeted amount and the actual amount. It is calculated by subtracting the budgeted amount from the actual amount. Depending on whether the actual numbers are higher or lower than the budgeted amount. It can be expressed as a positive or negative number.

• A positive variance indicates the actual spent was lower than the budgeted amount. This is a positive sign of financial performance.
• A negative variance indicates the actual amount spent was higher than the budgeted amount. This indicates under-performance and requires further investigation.

Whether positive variance or negative variance, it’s important to analyze the reasons for variances. This helps decision makers identify areas for improvement and better decision making for future budgeting.

Why is budget vs. actuals important?

Accurate forecasting and tracking of budget vs. actual provides a clear picture of the financial performance of the project, the department, and organization as a whole. So what’s the difference between budgeting to forecasting? Budgeting involves planning and allocating resources for a specific period, while forecasting involves predicting future outcomes based on past data and current trends.

It allows project managers to identify and address any cost overruns or inefficiencies. This information also helps to make informed decisions to bring the project back on track. Accurate tracking also ensures that the project remains on schedule and within budget. Plus, it also helps to find cost savings and resource optimization opportunities, which is obviously critical for any project managers or finance teams using this information.

Let’s take a deeper look at why understanding your budget vs. actuals is important:

1. It provides a clear forecast of the financial performance of a project.

This is critical for stakeholders, as it helps assess the financial viability of the project. It also makes room for informed decisions about future projects. The analysis allows project managers to find patterns and trends in the actual costs. They can then make more accurate cost estimates for future projects.

2. It helps to identify any variances in the project costs.

Variances are an equally important indicator of project performance. It helps identify areas where the project is underperforming or over-performing. This data or information allows project managers to make informed decisions about how the project can be adapted to meet the budget and cash flow.

3. It facilitates stakeholder communication.

By providing stakeholders with accurate and up-to-date information about project finances, project managers and finance teams can build trust and confidence with their team, sponsors, and other stakeholders.

How do you calculate the variance?

The formula for variance in budget vs. actual depends on the context and the data or information being analyzed. Variance in budget versus actual refers to the difference between the budgeted amount and the actual amount spent in a given period. And it can be used to assess performance and identify areas where adjustments may be needed.

Variance = Actual amount – Budgeted amount

Continuing with our example, here is a snapshot of actuals vs. budget variance analysis:

We had estimated about 570 hours of time and $5,100 as the total projected cost of the project. Turns out we ended up spending 635 hours and $56,640. That means that we overran our initial estimate by 65 hours and $6,500.

Let’s analyze budget vs. actual to figure out what caused this overrun:

• More time spent by backend developer and product designer

Overall, the backend developer ended up spending 360 hours on the project vs. the 300 hours estimated. Similarly, the product designer spent 85 hours vs. the budgeted 60 hours.

• Higher hourly rate for the Project Manager and Product Designer

Here are the budgeted hourly rates that were uploaded in Beebole.

And here are the actual hourly rates that were logged in Beebole.

We ended up paying $160/hour to the project manager vs. $150/hour in the budget. Similarly, for the project manager we spent $120/hour vs. the $100/hour in the budget.

Budget variance types (Examples)

To explain the variances, one can break it down into two components: Rate and Volume. Let’s have a deeper look:

1. Rate variance:

This reflects the difference between the actual cost or actual revenue per unit and the budgeted cost or revenue per unit. The formula for price variance is:

Rate variance Formula = (Actual Rate – Budgeted Rate) x Actual Time spent

2. Volume variance:

This reflects the difference between the actual time and the budgeted time. The formula for volume variance is:

Volume variance Formula = (Actual Time – Budgeted Time) x Budgeted Rate

Of the $6,500 total variance, the difference of $2,450 results from a change in the rate ($/hr). While the remaining $4,050 is the result of more time spent on the project.

Next let’s take a look at how to prepare an Actual to Budget Variance analysis report.

Best practice step-by-step guide to preparing an actual vs. budget variance analysis report

A budget variance analysis report follows a standard structure, including the following:

1. An introduction
2. Budget vs. actuals report: A summary of the budget and actual results
3. A breakdown of the variances
4. Variance analysis in Budgeting: Detailed analysis of the variance
5. Recommendations for action
6. Conclusion
7. Appendix and Financial Statements

Introduction

Start your budget variance report with a brief introduction of the findings and its purpose. It should explain what the report is about and why it matters.

Budget vs. actual report: Summary of budget to actuals expenses

The summary provides an overview of the budgeted amounts and the actual results.

It includes the budget amount and actual expenses for each line item, as well as the percentage variances. We can use tables or graphs to present the information in a clear and concise way.

Variance breakdown

This section breaks down the variances into its components.

This could be price variance, quantity variance, mix variance, and volume variance. Again, try using tables or graphs to present the information.

Variance analysis in budgeting: Budget variance analysis

Here we analyze the variance to identify the factors that contributed to the difference. We also determine the reasons for the variance, like whether the variance is favorable budget variance or unfavorable budget variance. Provide supporting evidence and examples to illustrate your analysis.

Recommendations for action

Based on the analysis, we can provide recommendations for action to address the variances. This is a chance to identify specific actions that can be taken to improve performance or specify anything else that can be done to achieve better results in the future. We explain how each recommendation can close the gap between budgeted and actual amounts.

How Beebole can help with reporting and analysis

Conclusion

Finally, here we summarize the key points of the report. Also, we emphasize the importance of taking action to improve performance. And provide a clear call to action and encourage stakeholders to implement the recommendations.

Appendices

These include any supporting information, such as tables, graphs, or detailed calculations and financial statements. It specifies instructions on how often to run a Budget to Actuals report, and it also shares guidelines and tips on Budget vs. actuals: how to control variance.

The appendices should be well-organized and easy to understand. When writing the report, we must keep in mind the audience and their expertise level. We should also use clear and concise language, and avoid technical jargon (unless it is absolutely necessary.) Don’t forget that the use of visuals, such as tables and graphs, helps explain complex information. Finally, proofread the report carefully to ensure it is error-free and well-structured.

Final thoughts on budget to actuals variance analysis

We hope that after reading this article you feel well-versed in the differences between budgets and actuals, and what a budget vs. actual variance is. Furthermore, we hope you can take that information and not only understand when it’s favorable and unfavorable variances. But how to present this information to stakeholders, finance teams, and more.

Budget to actual analysis is a critical aspect of the project management team. It helps project managers assess the financial viability of their projects and control fixed costs and variable costs by monitoring and analyzing expense variances between actual and budgeted costs. When done properly and efficiently, project managers can identify inefficiencies, make necessary adjustments, and ensure project success.

—

Photo by firmbee.com on Unsplash

The experts who have written or contributed to this article are independent from Beebole, and their contribution doesn't serve as endorsem*nt for our company/tool or their past/present organizations, employers, or associates.