August 31, 2022 by Seppi Esfandi in CaliforniaSpecial Report
Can I Run a Fight Club?
The old common-law idea that fighting between two adults willing to engage in the activity is essentially ‘legalized fighting’ is a misnomer. Given its origins in dueling, it’s hardly surprising that the idea has been watered down in the modern culture, where aggressive conduct and physical violence are frowned upon outside of strictly regulated sporting contexts.
Judges have difficulty determining who is at fault in cases involving consensual fighting, from contact ‘sports’ like backyard fighting, to frat initiation or gang initiation beatings.
An argument may be made that engaging in a fistfight is tantamount to accepting the danger of possible physical harm to yourself or the other party. If you subscribe to this school of thinking, you can’t truly hold someone responsible for injuries sustained in a fistfight. As its name implies, a street brawl may be rather hazardous. In a fistfight that all parties have agreed to, an individual’s right to self-defense is severely limited.
An individual who has initiated Mutual Combat loses the right to exercise Self Defense until and until that individual ceases hostilities, makes clear that he or she intends to end hostilities, and allows the other individual to end hostilities.
When Can ‘Self-Defense’ Be Used?
If the other person suddenly pulled a knife or pistol, you might argue you used lethal force to protect yourself when they file an assault or battery charges.
This self-defense tactic is effective when a conflict leaves someone dead or incapacitated.
Assualt or Battery
In most circ*mstances, you may say you agreed to fight to avoid battery charges (Battery, or assault, is the intentional infliction of physical damage on another person), even if the agreement was implied.
Prosecutors are less likely to press charges if one person’s injuries are minor and aren’t much worse than the other’s, and both acknowledge the fight was mutual. If you tell authorities the fight was mutual, you’re betting the other person will agree with you. If they do not comply with the sentiment, you will have supplied the police with information that might be used against you if charges are brought.
Mutual fighting is illegal; thus, prosecutors might prosecute both parties. Since both parties would claim their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, it would be difficult to convict either; hence prosecutors don’t usually file charges. Even if both parties claim that the fight was mutually agreed upon, the police would often arrest the participant who sustained fewer injuries and in cases where one participant died.
Disturbing the Peace
If the altercation occurred in a public area, both parties might face disorderly conduct penalties under PC 415. If one party was accused or the courts found them guilty of assault or battery, they would have additional penalties. Disturbing the peace may be prosecuted as either a minor violation carrying a fine or a more serious misdemeanor with a sentence of up to 90 days in prison and a $400 fine. It violates the law to engage in or incite a fight in a public area.
If you are to be declared guilty of Disturbing The Peace under California Penal Code 415, then you must do the following:
- To use language that is threatening in a public place to incite violence.
- Making unreasonably loud sounds.
- Arranging or engaging in a physical confrontation with another individual when both of you do not have the authorization to do so.
In California, “Disturbing the Peace” under Penal Code Section 415(1): (3)Specifically, Section415(1), the prosecution must prove each of the following aspects of the crime for a successful conviction:
- Intendedly: you consciously decided to commit a crime, using whatever measures necessary.
- You either sought to induce someone to fight with you or engaged in physical conflict with someone else.
- You battled someone or challenged them to a fight without having the authority to do so, which is illegal.
- The confrontation or challenge occurred in a public setting.
Everything you say during a street fight may be used against you in the future, regardless of the specific circ*mstances surrounding the argument. This is a piece of information that you should always keep in mind. If you or someone close to you are under investigation or arrest for attacking someone during mutual combat, do not make a statement to the authorities without first contacting your criminal defense lawyer.
Need an Attorney? CALL NOW: 310-274-6529
Seppi Esfandi is an Expert Attorney who has over 21 years of practice defending a variety of cases.
As an experienced legal expert with a deep understanding of the topic, it's crucial to approach the concept of consensual fighting, mutual combat, and related legal implications with precision and accuracy. The article, dated August 31, 2022, by Seppi Esfandi in California, explores the legal nuances surrounding consensual fighting, self-defense, assault, battery, and disturbing the peace.
Consensual Fighting: The article delves into the common-law idea that fighting between two consenting adults may be perceived as 'legalized fighting.' However, it challenges this notion, highlighting the difficulty judges face in determining fault in cases involving consensual fighting, whether in the context of backyard brawls, frat initiations, or gang beatings.
Mutual Combat: A key concept introduced is that of "Mutual Combat," where engaging in a fistfight may limit an individual's right to self-defense until they cease hostilities. The article emphasizes that if someone initiates mutual combat, they lose the right to exercise self-defense until they clearly express the intent to end hostilities and allow the other party to do the same.
Self-Defense: The article outlines the circ*mstances under which self-defense can be invoked, such as when faced with imminent lethal force, like a knife or pistol. It underscores the effectiveness of claiming self-defense in cases where conflicts result in severe harm or incapacitation.
Assault or Battery: In addressing assault and battery, the article suggests that admitting to a consensual fight may be a strategy to avoid battery charges. However, it warns that prosecutors might still press charges, especially if injuries are significant or if one party doesn't agree that the fight was mutual.
Disturbing the Peace: The piece explores the legal consequences of engaging in a physical altercation in a public area, citing potential charges under PC 415 for disorderly conduct. Disturbing the peace may result in fines or, in more severe cases, up to 90 days in prison and a $400 fine.
Elements of Disturbing the Peace (California Penal Code Section 415): The article explains the necessary elements for a successful conviction under Penal Code Section 415, including the intentional commission of a crime, inducing someone to fight or engaging in physical conflict without authority, and the occurrence of the confrontation or challenge in a public setting.
Legal Caution: Finally, the article concludes with a cautionary note, advising individuals involved in mutual combat to refrain from making statements to authorities without consulting a criminal defense lawyer. It highlights the potential consequences of statements made during a street fight, regardless of the circ*mstances.
In summary, the article navigates the legal intricacies surrounding consensual fighting, self-defense, assault, battery, and disturbing the peace, providing valuable insights for individuals and legal practitioners alike.
