Post Reply
- Print view
19 posts• Page 1 of 1
Topic Author
OldSport- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:01 pm
Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby OldSport »
I see a lot of argument for the Three Fund Portfolio, but has anyone tried a Five Fund Portfolio? The Three Fund Portfolio is pure Boglehead simplicity and works better than most investment strategies out there.
I prefer the Five Fund Portfolio. It only makes sense if you're 60% or more equities, if you're conservative and 50% or less, then the three fund is all you need.
But lets say you're mostly equities, then a 5 FP would look like:
0-40% Bonds - Total Bond Index
60-100% Equities
Of the Equities:
20-40% International
60-80% Domestic
Of the International:
50-75% Total International Index
25-50% Emerging Markets Index
Of the Domestic:
50-75% Total Stock Index
25-50% Small Cap Index (OR small cap value index OR small cap tax managed)
One example 5 fund portfolio could be:
20% Total Bond Index
15% Total Intl Index
10% Emerging Markets Index
35% Total Stock Market Index
20% Small Cap Value Index
Key to this working properly would be the periodic rebalancing, either annual or when the ratios get off too far. This captures periodic outperformance of an asset class. It is possible to slice and dice more, but that gets more complicated and would likely have very little added benefit. This works surprisingly well on Portfolio Visualizer.
Top
oldcomputerguy
- Moderator
- Posts: 17878
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 5:50 am
- Location: Tennessee
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby oldcomputerguy »
If this portfolio is what you feel is best for you, there's nothing wrong with doing it this way. By adding additional small-cap and emerging markets, you're essentially making a bet that those sectors will outperform going forward versus a straight total-market allocation, but if that's what you want, go for it. I don't have any opinion as to whether any particular sector will outperform, so I don't try to tilt away from a plain old three-fund portfolio. But to each his own.
(I didn't check it personally, I accept your statement that your five-fund allocation outperformed in Portfolio Visualizer. But that just means that it outperformed in the past, not that it will in the future. Past Performance Does Not Guarantee Future Results.)
There is only one success - to be able to spend your life in your own way. (Christopher Morley)
Top
Topic Author
OldSport- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:01 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby OldSport »
oldcomputerguy wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:39 pmIf this portfolio is what you feel is best for you, there's nothing wrong with doing it this way. By adding additional small-cap and emerging markets, you're essentially making a bet that those sectors will outperform going forward versus a straight total-market allocation, but if that's what you want, go for it. I don't have any opinion as to whether any particular sector will outperform, so I don't try to tilt away from a plain old three-fund portfolio. But to each his own.
(I didn't check it personally, I accept your statement that your five-fund allocation outperformed in Portfolio Visualizer. But that just means that it outperformed in the past, not that it will in the future. Past Performance Does Not Guarantee Future Results.)
I agree that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. I am making the following assumptions which is why I like the 5 fund portfolio:
- While emerging markets and small cap (or SCV) have outperformed the broader markets, there's no guarntee they will in the future, but there's no guarantee they will not.
- It is very highly likely that some years Intl will perform better than domestic and vice versa.
- It is very highly likely that some years EM will perform better than total intl and vice versa.
- It is very highly likely that some years SCV will perform better than total domestic and vice versa.
- I do not know what years what will perform better, but it is likely some will zig more while others zag more at any given time.
- The five fund portfolio is the simplest portfolio that allows to capture the zig zag within the broader international and domestic markets
- Periodic rebalancing is the key. Total risk adjusted returns (sortino ratio) should be better with periodic disciplined rebalancing than just letting sit in the original asset classes.
Top
- lakpr
- Posts: 11521
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:59 am
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby lakpr »
OldSport,
I am personally a 3-fund portfolio guy, but do find your rationale compelling. Do you have a link for the 5-fund portfolio backtest in Portfolio Visualizer?
Top
oldcomputerguy
- Moderator
- Posts: 17878
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 5:50 am
- Location: Tennessee
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby oldcomputerguy »
OldSport wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:52 pm
oldcomputerguy wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:39 pmIf this portfolio is what you feel is best for you, there's nothing wrong with doing it this way. By adding additional small-cap and emerging markets, you're essentially making a bet that those sectors will outperform going forward versus a straight total-market allocation, but if that's what you want, go for it. I don't have any opinion as to whether any particular sector will outperform, so I don't try to tilt away from a plain old three-fund portfolio. But to each his own.
(I didn't check it personally, I accept your statement that your five-fund allocation outperformed in Portfolio Visualizer. But that just means that it outperformed in the past, not that it will in the future. Past Performance Does Not Guarantee Future Results.)
I agree that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. I am making the following assumptions which is why I like the 5 fund portfolio:
- While emerging markets and small cap (or SCV) have outperformed the broader markets, there's no guarntee they will in the future, but there's no guarantee they will not.
- It is very highly likely that some years Intl will perform better than domestic and vice versa.
- It is very highly likely that some years EM will perform better than total intl and vice versa.
- It is very highly likely that some years SCV will perform better than total domestic and vice versa.
- I do not know what years what will perform better, but it is likely some will zig more while others zag more at any given time.
- The five fund portfolio is the simplest portfolio that allows to capture the zig zag within the broader international and domestic markets
- Periodic rebalancing is the key. Total risk adjusted returns (sortino ratio) should be better with periodic disciplined rebalancing than just letting sit in the original asset classes.
Well, I'm not that much of a slice 'n' dicer myself, but some do, and with (I assume) satisfactory results. I think it probably will be most important, as you say, to have discipline in rebalancing back to the target allocation in order to capture those zigs 'n' zags. Good luck. Come back in ten or fifteen years and let us know how you did.
There is only one success - to be able to spend your life in your own way. (Christopher Morley)
Top
- Olemiss540
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:46 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby Olemiss540 »
Like you I do not prefer a 3 fund. I use a 1 fund portfolio (Target Date). Least likely to result in performance chasing and FOMO, just set it and forget it.
By seeking market returns, you are outperforming 80% of portfolios. Average isnt so average afterall.
I hold index funds because I do not overestimate my ability to pick stocks OR stock pickers.
Top
- Ping Pong
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:51 am
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby Ping Pong »
This looks like someone took the six fund portfolio and removed the TIPS fund.
Top
- Olemiss540
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:46 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby Olemiss540 »
Ping Pong wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 8:49 pmThis looks like someone took the six fund portfolio and removed the TIPS fund.
What's next? 8 funds?!?!
I hold index funds because I do not overestimate my ability to pick stocks OR stock pickers.
Top
sarabayo
- Posts: 722
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2018 6:59 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby sarabayo »
OldSport wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:52 pm- It is very highly likely that some years Intl will perform better than domestic and vice versa.
- It is very highly likely that some years EM will perform better than total intl and vice versa.
- It is very highly likely that some years SCV will perform better than total domestic and vice versa.
- I do not know what years what will perform better, but it is likely some will zig more while others zag more at any given time.
I could say this about almost any random fund. "It is very highly likely that some years Fidelity Contrafund will perform better than total stock market and vice versa. I do not know what years what will perform better, but it is likely one will zig more while the other zags more at any given time." Therefore I need Contrafund in my portfolio? I don't think so. Something's missing here.
Top
andrew99999
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:14 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby andrew99999 »
So just tilting towards SCV and EM.
I think it's reasonable, but just like Paul Merriman's advice on using a glide path for SCV as you get older due to the higher risk/volatility, I think it would work the same for EM. I wouldn't be at all happy with over 1/3 of my portfolio in SCV and EM in retirement. If someone was 25 and believes in it enough to stick with it, sure it seems fine.
Top
sf_tech_saver
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 9:03 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby sf_tech_saver »
I'm a bit confused what this accomplishes vs. just using VTI (US total stock) and VTIAX (total international).
In VTIAX Emerging markets is currently near the range you mentioned: 21.80%
If I were using this strategy I'd be clear it was a tilt vs. a further diversification of the 3 fund approach.
Wouldn't the ~20% target of Emerging Markets within VTIAX accomplish the rebalancing you mention?
I'm no pro ....just asking what I'm missing beyond the ability to further tilt to EM above the 20% in VTIAX.
VTI is a modern marvel
Top
- samsdad
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:20 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby samsdad »
Someone around here just recently said, quite astutely I thought, that anything less than about 30% of your portfolio isn’t going to make much of a difference to your returns one way or the other.
“Strive for simplicity” is what I keep reading. I’ve got three funds (not those three) and could probably roll them down to one and end up somewhere in the same spot. I probably should do that; then again, I don’t spend time rebalancing.
Rebalancing five funds seems like herding cats.
Top
- delamer
- Posts: 17352
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:13 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby delamer »
Olemiss540 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 8:51 pm
Ping Pong wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 8:49 pmThis looks like someone took the six fund portfolio and removed the TIPS fund.
What's next? 8 funds?!?!
Sure.
Scott Burns’ Couch Potato Portfolios range from 2 fund to 10 fund, obviously more slicing and dicing as you add funds.
I use a variation of his “6 Ways from Sunday” portfolio for our retirement accounts.
I have not done a back test comparison to a 3 fund portfolio though.
One thing that humbles me deeply is to see that human genius has its limits while human stupidity does not. - Alexandre Dumas, fils
Top
Topic Author
OldSport- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:01 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby OldSport »
Interesting comments. Adding Contrafund would not be the same because it is a higher cost actively managed funds. The 5 Fund Portfolio uses passively managed low cost index funds with 2 subclasses within domestic and international to capture periodic outperformance either of the broader market or the subclass.
For example on Portfolio Visualizer backtested Jun 1998 - Dec 2018 (20 years).
Portfolio 1 (3 Fund Portfolio)
- 20% Bonds
- 55% Total US
- 25% Total Intl
Portfolio 2 (5 Fund Portfolio)
- 20% Bonds
- 35% Total US
- 20% SCV
- 15% Total Intl
- 10% EM
All Vanguard Index Investor Shares to get the 20 year history.
Portfolio 1: 5.61% CAGR with 0.37 Sharpe and 0.52 Sortino
Portfolio 2: 6.80% CAGR with 0.45 Sharpe and 0.64 Sortino
Top
- elainet7
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:52 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby elainet7 »
Total Intl has underperformed significantly versus TSM over the last 20yrs
Bogle never liked INTL initially but says 20% max of your equity allocation as the max
Top
- Olemiss540
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:46 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby Olemiss540 »
OldSport wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 7:24 amInteresting comments. Adding Contrafund would not be the same because it is a higher cost actively managed funds. The 5 Fund Portfolio uses passively managed low cost index funds with 2 subclasses within domestic and international to capture periodic outperformance either of the broader market or the subclass.
For example on Portfolio Visualizer backtested Jun 1998 - Dec 2018 (20 years).
Portfolio 1 (3 Fund Portfolio)
- 20% Bonds
- 55% Total US
- 25% Total IntlPortfolio 2 (5 Fund Portfolio)
- 20% Bonds
- 35% Total US
- 20% SCV
- 15% Total Intl
- 10% EMAll Vanguard Index Investor Shares to get the 20 year history.
Portfolio 1: 5.61% CAGR with 0.37 Sharpe and 0.52 Sortino
Portfolio 2: 6.80% CAGR with 0.45 Sharpe and 0.64 Sortino
Back testing does not provide any evidence of upcoming over performance. As a matter of logic, previous over performance in the financial markets would lead me to believe it caused a rush of funds to those sectors which would lead to the likelihood of underperformance in the nearer term.
http://www.vanguard.com/bogle_site/sp20020626.html
This is good reading with regards to this phenomenon. I am not intelligent enough to out strategize those in the market, so I stick to the only free lunches in investing (low cost and diversified) and focus my efforts on the most likely way to wealth (LBYM and savings rate).
I hold index funds because I do not overestimate my ability to pick stocks OR stock pickers.
Top
BeBH65
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 7:28 am
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby BeBH65 »
OldSport wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:31 pmOne example 5 fund portfolio could be:
20% Total Bond Index
15% Total Intl Index
10% Emerging Markets Index
35% Total Stock Market Index
20% Small Cap Value Index
Dont forget that Small Cap Value is already 3% of Total Stock market --> so you have now >10 times as much SCV than the neutral position, this is a very strong tilt.
Dont forget that Emerging is already 1/5 of Total Intl market --> so you have now 2.5 times as much EM than the neutral position, this is a strong tilt.
Consider using https://portfoliocharts.com central-portfolio-station/ for your AA backtesting.
This allows gives you a more complete view looking at all aspects of a portfolio and independent from starting date.
What numbers do you get there?
BeBH65. (only an investment enthusiast, not a financial adviser, perform your due diligence). | Have a look at https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Outline_of_Non-US_domiciles
Top
- averagedude
- Posts: 1772
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2018 3:41 pm
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby averagedude »
Your 5 fund portfolio is a reasonable plan and i would wager that it will outperform the 3 fund portfolio over a very long time horizon, but there are no guarantee's. The key to any reasonable plan is to stick with it without tinkering. Studies have shown that the more complex the investment strategy, the more likely you are to change it.
Top
- dbr
- Posts: 46138
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:50 am
Re: Anyone try the Five Fund Portfolio?
- Quote
Postby dbr »
You can find recipe books full of every variety of portfolios for every taste. The usual theory is the pernicious idea that more sophisticated investors should own the more sophisticated portfolio (the one with more funds in it).
A better approach, if one wants it, is to consider the possible rationale for either adding asset classes or concentrating in certain asset classes. Swedroe has a book on factor investing and also a book on alternative investments. One could start by reading both. There is plenty of discussion on this forum regarding REITs, commodities, gold specifically, adding emerging markets, microcaps, or whatever. One can make up one's mind.
My conclusion is that it is very difficult to establish that there is a way to pick a universally consistently superior portfolio over all other portfolios. Remember that the actual results a person will get will come from such a wildly variable range of possible outcomes that differences on prospective average among choices are not going to mean very much.
Top
Post Reply
- Print view
19 posts• Page 1 of 1
Return to “Personal Investments”
Jump to
- US Investors
- ↳ Personal Investments
- ↳ Personal Finance (Not Investing)
- Non-US Investors
- ↳ Non-US Investing
- ↳ Canada - Financial Wisdom Forum
- ↳ Spain - Bogleheads® España
- ↳ Spain
- ↳ United Arab Emirates
- Wiki
- ↳ The Bogleheads® Wiki: a collaborative work of the Bogleheads community
- ↳ Canada - finiki (wiki)
- Community
- ↳ Personal Consumer Issues
- ↳ Local Chapters and Bogleheads Community
- ↳ US Chapters
- ↳ Wiki and Reference Library
- ↳ Non-US Chapters
- ↳ Calendar of Events
- ↳ Forum Issues and Administration