A new extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (2024)

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania

Scientific Reports volume13, Articlenumber:6112 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Sulfidic cave ecosystems are remarkable evolutionary hotspots that have witnessed adaptive radiation of their fauna represented by extremophile species having particular traits. Ostracods, a very old group of crustaceans, exhibit specific morphological and ecophysiological features that enable them to thrive in groundwater sulfidic environments. Herein, we report a peculiar new ostracod species Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. thriving in the chemoautotrophic sulfidic groundwater ecosystem of Movile Cave (Romania). The new species displays a set of hom*oplastic features specific for unrelated stygobitic species, e.g., triangular carapace in lateral view with reduced postero-dorsal part and simplification of limb chaetotaxy (i.e., loss of some claws and reduction of secondary male sex characteristics), driven by a convergent or parallel evolution during or after colonization of the groundwater realm. P. movilaensis sp. nov. thrives exclusively in sulfidic meso-thermal waters (21°C) with high concentrations of sulphides, methane, and ammonium. Based on the geometric morphometrics-based study of the carapace shape and molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the COI marker (mtDNA), we discuss the phylogenetic relationship and evolutionary implication for the new species to thrive in groundwater sulfidic groundwater environments.

Similar content being viewed by others

Introduction

Sulfidic ecosystems from thermal vents in deep sea, continental karst springs, and caves, are inhabited by some of the most extraordinary extremophile organisms on the planet1,2,3. In these ecosystems, the absence of light precludes photosynthesis—the chemical process by which green plants draw energy from sunlight to build carbohydrates from water and carbon dioxide. Here, chemoautotrophic microbes are at the bottom of the food chain and use a different strategy to extract energy by oxidizing hydrogen sulphide as a replacement for radiant energy from sunlight4,5,6. They not only survive in this challenging environment but also provide food for organisms of higher trophic levels.

In the last decade, deep sea thermal vents have attracted much attention due to their high diversity of chemoautotrophic prokaryotes and marine invertebrates that have adapted to wide thermal gradients, high pressure, and chemically extreme environments usually by living in symbiosis with chemosynthetic microbes, enabling them to cope with toxic waters rich in hydrogen sulphide and methane7,8,9. In contrast, in continental sulfidic cave ecosystems (SCE), which share their highly unusual nature with sulfuric deep-sea hydrothermal vents, fundamental studies on invertebrate biota are still scarce5,10,11,12,13,14,15. An exception is the first discovered cave ecosystem of this type, the Movile Cave in Romania, the microorganism communities of which have been exhaustively studied since its discovery5,6,16,17.

Sulfidic cave ecosystems caves are generally considered extreme and are characterized by warm waters, high levels of sulphide, methane, and ammonium; heavy metals (iron, zinc, and copper); and low oxygen concentrations up to hypoxia5,18,19,20. Hydrogen sulphide concentration is significantly high in SCE and was abundant in the ancient, anoxic oceans of the Proterozoic serving as an energy source for early forms of life21. Organisms from various phyla have colonized such toxic environments, giving rise to unique ecological communities and complex trophic networks, which are supported entirely by chemoautotrophic organisms and particularly by sulphate-reducing bacteria7,8. Although sulphide is generally highly toxic to most organisms, SCE host extremophile life forms that show a combination of morpho–ecological traits and metabolic and physiologic adaptations, enabling them to cope with such extreme conditions. In this regard, SCE and their fauna are considered remarkable ‘evolutionary hotspots’, which can be a model for extra-terrestrial life on Mars22,23.

The few available studies on sulfidic cave ecosystems aquatic invertebrates indicate that crustaceans show high diversity in several groups that hypothetically retain some archetypal features as adaptive features to cope with hypoxia and high concentrations of sulphide and methane in a similar way as their marine relatives 5,10,11,14,15,24,25. Moreover, they show high capacity for long-term anaerobiosis26 and well-developed mechanisms for sulphide detoxification27,28. Moreover, they show high capacity for long-term anaerobiosis26 and well-developed mechanisms for sulphide detoxification27,28. These subterranean species, even representing phylogenetically distant phyla, have attained striking similarity and show typical ‘regressive’ characters, e.g., reduction or absence of eyes, loss of pigment, elongated body shape and appendages, modifications of sensory organs, and slow metabolism29.

Among crustaceans, ostracods are only mentioned as being present in SCE as a group but neither data on species diversity nor taxonomic descriptions of new species or species exclusively associated with hydrogen sulphide-rich continental groundwaters are currently available5,11,14. Ostracoda are an ancient class dating back to the Early Ordovician or Late Cambrian period (~ 505 to 485 Mya)30. They are small crustaceans with the body enclosed in a calcified bivalve shell that completely covers the entire animal. They generally feed on aquatic bacteria, fungi, algae, and detritus.

Studies on ostracod evolution and adaptive radiation have a long history. In particular, the functional morphology of easily fossilizing calcitic carapaces, and their adaptive response to environmental conditions, have been studied intensively from empirical and theoretical viewpoints31 (references cited therein). The shape, ornamentation, and size of the ostracod carapace have often been subjected to evolution in the same direction in distinct and unrelated species but sharing similar environmental pressures32. Such similarities between organisms for reasons other than inheritance from a common ancestor is termed hom*oplasy and is caused by either convergent or parallel evolution33. Convergence may lead to homeomorphy, which is defined as similarity affecting the whole outer appearance to such a degree that one organism may be mistaken for the other.

hom*oplasy (or its special case homeomorphy) is an important issue in ostracod evolutionary biology as hom*oplastic similarities, particularly occurring in reasonably close phylogenetic groups, can make phylogenetic analysis more challenging31,32,33,34. Morphological hom*oplasy is assumed to act with preference on those structures that have the highest probability to become advantageous for a species living in a certain environment.

Here, we describe a new cave ostracod species thriving in sulfidic-rich waters of the Movile Cave in southeast Romania. We use geometric morphometrics related to the carapace shape of the new species in comparison with its closest relatives of the genera Pseudocandona Kaufmann and Typhlocypris Vejdovský and DNA sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene to infer the phylogenetic relationships of the new species.

Results

Taxonomic account

Family: Candonidae Kaufmann, 1900

Subfamily: Candoninae Kaufmann, 1900

Genus: Pseudocandona Kaufmann, 1900

Pseudocandona movilaensis [Iepure, Wysocka and Namiotko] sp. nov.

Type material. Holotype (NSMT-Pol H-837) female and one paratype female (ICHUM-6177) are deposited in the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba (NSMT). Allotype male is dissected in glycerin with limbs mounted on a permanent slide, and left valve stored dry in a micro-paleontological cell. A paratype female (ISER—F20) deposited at the Institute of Speleology “Emil Racoviţă” (Cluj Napoca, Romania) dissected in glycerin and limbs mounted on a permanent slide; left valve stored dry in a micro-paleontological cell. Other paratypes, ca. 40 specimens in tubes with alcohol (ISER F21—61), one male (ISER—M62) and one female (ISER—F63) dissected on permanent glass slides with valves kept dry in micropaleontological slides as well as empty valves mounted on SEM stubs) are housed in ostracod collection in the Institute of Speleology “Emil Racoviţă” (Cluj Napoca, Romania) (SI) and Department of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics of the University of Gdansk (TN). Three paratype specimens were used for DNA analysis. Sequences originated from these paratypes are deposited at GeneBank (see Table S1 for accession numbers).

LSID Zoobank: https://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/8bb34881-00e3-46a4-8297-9e6691fc9b4e.

Type locality and habitat. Sulfidic lake inLakeRoom, Movile Cave (Romania) (43°49′36.38′′ N, 28°33′43.48′′ E, 24m a.s.l.).

Etymology. The name of a new species is an adjective derived from the name of the type locality, Movile Cave near Mangalia, Constanţa County, south-east Romania.

Diagnosis. Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. is distinctive from its congeners by the following set of morphological characters: (1) Carapace and left valves of both males and females as well as juveniles with high dorsal arch, giving a triangular shape in lateral view (Fig. 1, Figs. S1, S2). (2) Female antennal claws G1 = 1.6× and GM = 1.3× the length of penultimate endopodial segment (Fig.2A). (3) Male antenna with divided 2nd endopodial segment but with no male bristles (Fig. 2B, Fig. S4). (4) Male antennal claws G2 = 1.6×, GM = 1.3× and z1 = 0.94× the length of (undivided) penultimate segment (Fig. 2B, Fig. S4). (5) Mandibular palp 2nd segment with 3 (setal group) + 1 + beta setae on the inner edge, and penultimate segment with gamma seta smooth (not plumose) (Figs. S3, S4). (6) Male fifth limb endopodite palps (clasping organs) asymmetrical (Fig. 2D,E, Fig. S4). (7) Seventh limb (cleaning leg) four-segmented, protopodite with three setae, penultimate segment lacking f seta and terminal segment with two long setae h2 and h3, and one short and slightly curved h1 seta (Figs. S3, S4). (8) Uropodal ramus of both sexes with posterior claw Gp remarkably reduced, less than half of anterior claw Ga (Fig. 2C, Figs. S4, S5). (9) Inner lobe (b) of hemipenis distally broadly rounded, with a distinct, acuminated expansion oriented to the postero-ventral end of the body (Fig. 2F, Fig. S5).

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (4)

Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. (A) Internal view of female left valve. (B) External view of female right valve. (C) Internal view of female right valve. (D) external view of female left valve. (E) External view of male left valve. (F) External view of male right valve (scale—200µm).

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (5)

Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. (A) Female second antenna. (B) Male second antenna. (C) Female uropodal rami. (D) Male right clasping organ (fifth limb palp). (E) Male left clasping organ (fifth limb palp). (F) Hemipenis. Scale bars (100µm).

Description (for the full description see Supplementary material).

Geometric morphometrics of the valve shape

To predict the genus/species-group to which our Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. may be classified based exclusively on the valve shape, we used Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) on the distance matrix from the B-spline geometric morphometrics analysis (Fig.3). The results of CAP of the discrimination between three groups of species which were selected as morphologically the closest based on the limb morphology (Typhlocypris vs. Pseudocandona ex gr. compressa vs. Pseudocandona ex gr. rostrata, see Table 1) show that the first squared canonical correlation was relatively large (0.904) and indeed the first canonical axis clearly separated the stygobitic species of the genus Typhlocypris, all having triangular valve shape in lateral view. This was the most distinct group, which had 100% allocation success under cross-validation. The other two groups of the genus Pseudocandona (gr. compressa and gr. rostrata) were hardly distinct from one another (Fig.3), although their allocation success rates were still considerably large (at 80.0% and 85.7%, respectively). The second canonical axis had a much smaller eigenvalue (0.127) and there is actually no separation of the three groups along the second axis.

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (6)

Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) plot of geometric morphometrics data of the valve shape, showing the position of Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. (yellow triangle) based on its morphometric resemblances with the species of the genus Typhlocypris (black triangles) and those of the two species-groups of the genus Pseudocandona (green squares = compressa species-group, blue squares = rostrata species-group). For the species codes see Table 1.

When our new species Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. was analyzed using the existing CAP model to classify this species into one of the three existing groups specified above, it was clearly located within the cloud of the triangular Typhlocypris species, close to T. marmonieri (Fig.3) with the distance to the centroid of this group 0.029, compared with distances of 0.399 and 0.352 to the centroids of the groups of Pseudocandona gr. compressa and P. gr. rostrata, respectively. Although uneven number of species was included in the three studied groups (Table 1), the distance-based test for hom*ogeneity of multivariate dispersion (PERMDISP) showed no statistically significant differences (F = 2.557; P(perm) = 0.170) in the within-group multivariate dispersion among the three groups. To conclude, based on the valve shape in lateral view Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. resembles to a great extent the stygobitic species of the genus Typhlocypris.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis

In the NJ tree generated based on the haplotype COI data set (Table 1, Table S1), only the shallow branches were well-resolved (Fig.4). The deep nodes remained poorly supported as the COI marker is unsuitable for the phylogenetic reconstructions of deep evolutionary histories. Nevertheless, focusing on well-supported terminal branches, our results showed that Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov. appeared to be closely affiliated to Pseudocandona species (Fig.4). Furthermore, the new species is close to the clade formed by species of the Pseudocandona rostrata group (P. marchica and P. hartwigi) with the mean K2P pairwise genetic distances at the level of 0.15 (Table S2). The mean genetic distance between P. movilaensis sp. nov.and the P. compressa species-group (P. albicans and P. compressa) was 0.20, whereas between P. movilaensis sp. nov. and species of the genus Typhlocypris 0.24.

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (7)

Neighbor-joining tree of the studied ostracod species based on the COI gene sequences (for species codes see Table 1). The distances were calculated with Kimura 2-parameter method. The numbers in front of the nodes indicate bootstrap support (1000 replicates, only values higher than 50% are presented).

Habitat characteristics, ecology and distribution

Pseudocandona movilaensis was reported from sulfidic thermal groundwaters (21 °C) characterized by slightly alkaline waters (pH of 7.2) and high concentrations of sulfide (0.25moldm−3), methane (0.02moldm−3) and ammonia (0.28moldm−3)5.

The species is known exclusively from the sulfide waters of the Movile Cave (SE Romania, 2km from the Black Sea shore) in the Lake Room (of 1.5m in diameter and the water depth of about 1m) located at 18m below the surface and representing the first 40m long partially flooded gallery as well as from two hand-dug wells located at ca. 1km from the cave5,22. The specimens from wells were only empty carapaces and it is assumed that the species may live in other sulfidic sites within the mesothermal aquifer from Mangalia or the presence of the carapaces in the well is the result of the passive transport with the groundwater flow (Fig.5).

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (8)

Location of Movile Cave near Mangalia (south eastern Romania). (A) Location of Movile Cave (red dot) and the hand-dug well in Mangalia village (blue dot). (B) Landscape around Movile Cave. (C) Profile of Movile Cave (map after Sarbu, 2000). (D) Lake Roomfrom where the specimens were collected.

In situ live specimens in Lake Room were observed to live close to the wall and move downward to 10cm to the bottom lake (which is almost hypoxic) and return to the surface after few seconds. They probably live at the redox interphase between the oxygenated and the cross-formational rising anoxic water (the top 10cm of the Lake Room water), where the chemosynthetic sulfide-oxidizing bacteria thrive. The examination of live and dead specimens immediately after sampling revealed that all living specimens bear bacterial filaments on the shells, whereas none of the carapaces of dead animals presents these attachments.

Discussion

First taxonomic description of an ostracod from a SCE

Non-marine ostracods reported from sulfidic groundwaters are very rare, although non-marine ostracods generally thrive in a large array of extreme habitats, such as hot springs (with temperatures exceeding 50°C), cold (up to freezing temperature), acidic (with pH as low as 3.4), and hypersaline waters (at salinities in excess of 100‰) as well as in temporary ponds prone to frequent complete drying or in deep groundwaters35,36.

As it stands, there are few well-documented SCE continental sites where ostracods are essential contributors to species diversity and an important functional group in the food web network. Among them are Movile Cave in Romania, Frasassi Cave in Italy, Ayalon Cave in Israel, and the more recently discovered Melissotrypa Cave in Greece5,10,11,15. Ostracods in SCE, however, are yet to be taxonomically studied to determine their species-specific adaptations to SCE or to investigate the environmental conditions in sulfidic waters that govern species spatial distribution.

hom*oplasy, phylogeny, troglomorphic features, and adaptation to subterranean realm

P. movilaensis sp. nov.has three distinctive morphological traits, which we consider hom*oplastic, i.e. gained or lost independently by species representing separate phylogenetic lineages: (1) triangular shape of the carapace and left valve in lateral view, (2) lack of so-called male bristles on the second antenna (setae t2 and t3 are not transformed in males into thick sensory bristles and remain similar to their counterparts in females), and (3) reduction of the posterior claw of the uropodal ramus in both sexes (with stronger reduction in males).

There is a striking and absorbing resemblance in general triangular carapace shape between several subterranean species belonging to various genera of the subfamily Candoninae. This triangular shape is one of the diagnostic traits (coupled with fine valve ornamentation and narrow inner lamellae in both adult and juvenile stages) of the exclusively subterranean genus Typhlocypris37, which shares this trait with some species of morphologically distinct genera containing species having mostly different (non-triangular) carapace shapes. Examples include subterranean Fabaeformiscandona aemonae, Mixtacandona tabacarui, Schellencandona triquetra, and Candonopsis mareza but also epigean species living in ancient lakes of Ohrid (e.g., Neglecandona goricensis and N. litoralis) and Baikal (e.g., Baicalocandona navitarum and B. zenkevichi)38. These ‘triangular’ species, however, can be morphologically easily distinguished from the lineage constituting the genus Typhlocypris based on differential diagnostic characters (of both carapace and limbs) of the genera to which they belong. P. movilaensis sp. nov. also possesses the carapace of triangular shape in lateral view (Fig.1A,D), which suggests a close affinity with species of the genus Typhlocypris (Fig.3). The only character of the valve morphology of P. movilaensis sp. nov. differing from species of the genus Typhlocypris are the slightly wider calcified inner lamella in female LV, amounting anteriorly to 10–11% of the valve length and being approximately 2.4× as wide posteriorly (in Typhlocypris usually it is ≤ 10% and < 2.0×, respectively). P. movilaensis sp. nov.shows a blend of morphological characters shared with species belonging to the genus Typhlocypris and to the rostrata-group of the genus Pseudocandona (see Diagnosis above and Description in Supplementary Materials). For these reasons, closer relationship of this ostracod either to Typhlocypris or Pseudocandona gr. rostrata based on morphological characters may be considered tenuous at best. The phylogenetic placement of P. movilaensis sp. nov. on the COI sequence tree (Fig.4) and genetic distances with other studied species (Tables S2 and S3), however, supports hypothesis of its closer affinity with the species of the rostrata-group of the genus Pseudocandona, which typically develop carapaces of rectangular shape when viewed laterally. Thus, more distant relationship of P. movilaensis sp. nov. and Typhlocypris implies hom*oplastic evolution of the triangular carapace shape. The only species of the genus Pseudocandona with triangular carapace (except for some Baikalian species) is P. punctata known from lakes in Ohio39, but this species has an isolated position in the genus (with possible affinities with Baikalian candonids) and differs from P. movilaensis sp. nov. in ornamented valves, shape of male prehensile palps, straight (not curved) h1 seta on the cleaning leg, and the shape of lobes of hemipenis40. Although denser species sampling is needed for genetic data (but see results of the preliminary phylogenetic studies presented in41, where this species was initially marked as Pseudocandona sp. nov.), our new findings add to previous morphological evidence for morphological hom*oplasy of the triangular carapace shape among species of various genera of the subfamily Candoninae, further disassociating a polyphyletic group of ‘triangular’ Candoninae into different genera.

Typically, in the subfamily Candoninae, the second antenna (A2) is sexually dimorphic. In males, among other dimorphic traits, the penultimate segment is subdivided and bears the so-called male bristles, which play important prehensile and sensorial roles during courtship and copulation. These bristles are believed to be modified setae t2 and t3, which in females remain untransformed and are set on the undivided penultimate segment42. P. movilaensis sp. nov. has rare morphological combination, i.e., lacks male bristles but the penultimate segment of A2 is at least slightly separated by a thin chitinous septum. Within Candoninae, in some species or entire genera, male bristles are absent (with the penultimate segment divided or undivided), and it seems such cases are more frequent in subterranean lineages than in species inhabiting surface waters. Subterranean examples include all or most species of several endemic Nearctic genera of the tribe Cabralcandonini43; several Australian genera (e.g., Leicandona and all genera of the tribe Humphreyscandonini); Neotropical genus Danielocandona; Afrotropical genus Namibcypris; Palaearctic Marococandona and Marmocandona44 (and references therein); as well as some or single species of the genera Mixtacandona, Trajancandona, and Typhlocypris. Examples from surface waters are rarer and include some or single species of the genera Baicalocandona, Candona, Cubacandona, and Paracandona as well as few species of Pseudocandona. As for the latter genus, thus far, males of only four species have been known to lack male bristles, viz. European P. insculpta and P. regnisnicolai of the compressa-species group45, north American P. punctata of the carribeana-species group40, and Japanese P. atmeta of the rostrata-species group46. All these species (except for P. punctata, see above) have non-triangular carapace shape, clearly distinguishing them from P. movilaensis sp. nov. Our new species differs also from ‘triangular’ Typhlocypris pretneri (the single species lacking male bristles) in the morphology of the hemipenis and uropod. In any case, the lack of male bristles in different genera (or even tribes) within Candoninae indicates hom*oplastic evolution, implying that developmental transformation of t-setae into male bristles may be caused by recurrent mutations across not closely related taxa.

In the subfamily Candoninae, uropod commonly consists of two rod-shaped rami, each bearing distally two claws and two setae42,44. A number of various reductions of this chaetotaxic scheme have been described within separate genera and tribes. The common reductions include the absence of a posterior seta (e.g., some genera of the tribe Candonopsini) or reduction of size, transformation to seta, or complete lack of a posterior claw Gp (as e.g., in the genus Meischcandona or in several subterranean genera endemic to Australia). In some species, the uropodal ramus is strongly reduced with only one apical claw or seta (e.g., some genera of the tribe Cabralcandonini43 and the tribe Namibcypridini47) or even the ramus is reduced to a flagellum without any setae or claws (as in Cabralcandona)43. Beyond doubt, simplification of the uropodal ramus has occurred several times within the subfamily Candoninae, and if the similarity in the form of the caudal ramus exists in different lineages, it presents another example of hom*oplasy, which may create difficulties in phylogenetic analysis. In the four closely related genera: Pseudocandona, Typhlocypris, Schellencandona, and Marmocandona, the uropodal ramus is well-developed, with two claws and two setae. To our knowledge, P. movilaensis sp. nov. is unique in having reduced Gp claw in both sexes. The only other species of Pseudocandona with reduced Gp, but only in males, is P. marchica, which can be easily distinguished from our new species by having a non-triangular carapace shape and well-developed male bristles42.

Although traditionally hom*oplasies are considered to be caused by convergence (when arising by different developmental pathways) or parallelism (if similar developmental mechanisms are involved)48, some evolutionary biologists argue that convergent and parallel evolution are difficult to distinguish as there is a continuum between these, and thus, propose to use a single term—convergent evolution49. Nevertheless, at this stage, it is entirely speculative if the three above-mentioned hom*oplastic traits have evolved independently in P. movilaensis sp. nov.

Stygobitic cavernous crustaceans belonging to different phylogenetic groups evolve independently with similar suits of traits termed troglomorphic50. For example, several amphipods and isopods inhabiting cave waters show increased appendage length or setation and advanced development of chemo-sensorial organs29. As presented above, the three hom*oplastic characters of P. movilaensis sp. nov. can be also considered troglomorphic. We hypothesize that at least two of these traits (lack of male bristles and triangularly-shaped carapace) may have resulted from paedomorphosis, a well-known heterochronic evolutionary process of the retention of youthful ancestral features by adult descendants51. There are two distinct processes explaining paedomorphosis: acceleration of sexual maturation relative to the rest of development (progenesis) and retardation of somatic development with respect to the onset of reproductive activity (neoteny). We believe that paedomorphic characters of P. movilaensis sp. nov. results from neoteny rather than progenesis. The pressures that cause either of these types of paedomorphic evolution remain unclear. Future investigations should address this problem through in situ and/or laboratory studies on developmental changes in morphology and on the life history of our new species.

The question arises whether the troglomorphic characters of P. movilaensis sp. nov. are adaptations to general cavernous conditions or specifically to SCE. Reduced posterior claw Gp on the uropodal ramus has probably no adaptive value because the energetic expense connected with the reinforcement of that seta into a claw would be minimal. It is also hard to deduce if uropod, with one ‘normally’ developed long anterior claw and short Gp, could be more effectively used to glide over the mat of sulfidic bacteria compared to the use of typical Candoninae uropod with two long claws. At this stage, it is also entirely speculative if ‘immaturity’ of retarded development of the t2 and t3 setae (resulting in the absence of chemo-sensorial male bristles) has been caused by any specific selection for such morphology, which should then have adaptive advantages in SCE. Unfortunately, clear comparative experimental data on mating or pre-copulatory behaviour of species with and without developed male bristles are so far lacking, thus, preventing an opportunity to contrast possible differences and function of this sexually dimorphic feature within the subfamily Candoninae.

The carapace of ostracods acts as an interface between the organism and environment and is more likely to be subjected to selection pressures and to have an adaptive value52. The adaptive significance of the valve shape among the true subterranean ostracods is still a debated issue53. If the evolutionary process is not driven by the selective pressure of cave conditions, ‘triangularization’ of the ostracod carapace shape may start either outside the cave (being already present in the ancestor or gained during the colonization of the cavernous environment) or inside the cave (gained after successful colonization of the subterranean realm). We hypothesize that triangular carapace shape may be an adaptive feature selected under environmental conditions in caves, where underdevelopment of the postero–dorsal section of the carapace may provide energetic solution to the oligotrophic cave conditions (less material needed, see below) coupled with low reproduction rate (less space needed for lower number of eggs).

Engineering construction of the carapace

The carapace in ostracods has functional implications, and it is viewed as an efficient ‘engineering construction’ adopting a shape and a structure design according to the environmental conditions in which the species lives with the use of minimal amounts of material54. The first author advancing the idea that the ostracod carapace ‘is a static frame structure with a shape, which, during evolution, can be deformed following specific rules’ was Benson55. He stated that a hint to understand the solutions adopted by ostracods to obtain the most advantageous carapace shape can be traced by making analogies with the techniques used in architecture constructions. Hence, the ostracod carapace is seen as having similar design to a dome with a double walled cupola with the exterior part being thicker and more resistant and the internal one thin (Fig.6). Later on, Danielopol52 advanced the idea that the triangular shape of the ostracod valves is a benefit and fitness solution for species thriving in subterranean environment. The triangular shape of carapace is viewed in a similar way as a tripod, wherein the weight is distributed more efficiently among the three faces (Fig.6). In agreement with the principles of geometry and mechanics, it is well-known that a triangular shape structure in general has two advantages: (1) deformation is more difficult and is able to balance the stretching and compressive forces inside the structure and (2) is less costly as it requires less material to make the three sides of the triangle.

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (9)

(A) Architectural representation of the triangular shape of ostracod carapace. (B) Female left valve in lateral view of Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov.

The triangular shape of the carapace can also have an ecological meaning. In an environment with a high concentration of sulphide and methane, the species must take protective measures against the diffusion of these elements from water into the body56. For example, marine ostracods from thermal vents have a waterproof shell57. Moreover, an appropriate shell shape can also help the animal to reduce the surface area and volume so that diffusion of toxic elements is minimal. Hence, the triangular valve shape remarked in P. movilaensis sp. nov. vs. the typical rectangular shape of the Pseudocandona species from the rostrata-group (even taking into account the simplification of the three-dimension-model to 2D) may offer a selective advantage for the species that developed or retained this solution, which was already present in its ancestor.

Ancientness

Some insight into the early evolution of the triangular-shaped Candoninae lineages can be gleaned from fossil record. The oldest records of triangular Candoninae assigned to the phylogenetic lineage of the genus Typhlocypris can be traced to T. pechelbronnensis from Oligocene to Early Miocene deposits in eastern France and western Germany as well as T. roaixensis and T. ratisbonensis from Miocene in southern France and Czech Republic. These three species were recorded from epigean fresh or brackish water paleo-habitats and may be hypothetical ancestors of the Typhlocypris lineage37,58. The triangular shape of the valves in lateral view, which resembles that of various living triangular stygobitic European species, has been also observed in a number of fossil species of Late Miocene to Quaternary deposits in Europe and Western Asia, e.g., Candona (Typhlocypris) aff. eremita from the Late Miocene (ca. 11.6 Mya) in (paleo) Lake Pannon59 or Caspiocypris schneiderae and Caspiocypris ola from the Pliocene and Quaternary deposits in Azerbaijan60. Some of these species may represent either the lineage of Typhlocypris or are ancestors of other recent triangular European species, including our new P. movilaensis In order to account for such relationships forming a basis of taxonomical categorization, however, further comparative morphological studies are needed using original material. The ancientness of the potential ancestors of P. movilaensis sp. nov. may be further deduced with the onset of the underground system of the Movile Cave dating back to the Late Miocene (ca. 12.5 Mya)5.

Finally, it is noteworthy to mention the recent studies on fossil ostracods from Late Pleistocene sediments (ca. 15,000 years ago) in the north-west part of the Black Sea (ca. 4m depth)61. Furthermore, in the sediments deposited under oxygenated bottom-water conditions, abundant populations of Candoninae (a group consisting of mostly freshwater species) were found, with few specimens showing triangular left valve. The presence of Candoninae in marine sediments of the Black Sea is associated with a shift in geochemical settings and a sharp rise in the carbonate content about 15,000years ago in the area. This suggests an increase of melt-water pulses that were discharged into the Black Sea basin from the Eurasian region and a passive transport of freshwater ostracods into the sea.

Conclusions

This is the first taxonomic description of a freshwater ostracod species living exclusively in sulfidic cave waters. We assume that the triangular valve shape in the newly described cave species P. movilaensis sp. nov. is a paedomorphic trait, which could be advantageous in the groundwater environment. We further assume that phenotypic similarity in the valve shape of P. movilaensis sp. nov. with the stygobite species of the genus Typhlocypris (as well as with other triangular-shaped stygobitic species of other Candoninae genera) is a hom*oplasy caused by convergent or parallel evolution, attributable to the similar environmental constraints that need to be overcome to survive in the extreme subterranean realm.

The position of the new species within the rostrata group of the genus Pseudocandona, as indicated by the COI phylogeny, also corroborates the hom*oplastic nature of other traits that are shared with species morphologically assigned to separate lineages. These results suggest that some traditional characters used to unite certain non-marine ostracods evolved more than once, often obscuring their true phylogeny. Our findings of a new non-marine ostracod thriving in rich sulfidic groundwaters open the pathway to boost further studies on morphological, physiological, and metabolic adaptations to this specific type of waters; identify if the ecological plasticity of certain species that enable them to live in the toxic environment; and if there is a congruence in adaptive strategies adopted by ostracod species from continental groundwater vs. thermal vents. Movile Cave is in a coastal aquifer, which is affected by anthropogenic and natural alterations. These impacts may have implications for management of groundwater and fauna from other sea–ocean–freshwater groundwater connected systems. Hence, further studies may be oriented on the anthropogenic impact (e.g., overexploitation and contamination of the aquifer) and climate change effects on species and habitats.

Methods

Sampling and description

More than 40 specimens of ostracod crustaceans were collected from the sulfidic waters of the Lake Room in Movile Cave, Romania (43°49.611' N, 28°33.684' E)5 in three sampling campaigns in 1990 (May), 2012 (April, September) and 2015 (May) by Serban Sarbu (Fig.5). Specimens were taken from the top 10cm of the Lake Room walls with a pipette and preserved in 90% ethanol. There were no replicates taken since the purpose of the study was taxonomic. Samples were taken once at each sampling time until the number of specimens were attained for the scope of our study.

Lake Room represents the piezometric level of the mesothermal sulfidic aquifer of Mangalia which occupies a surface of approximately 50–100 km2. Lake Room is located at 18m depth below the surface, has a diameter of 1.5m and the water depth is about 1 m6,22. The water at the surface is relatively stagnant while a slow groundwater flow is present at depths over 1 m22. The physico-chemical parameters of the water are constant, and no fluctuations have been registered during each sampling campaign (H2S = 30mg/L; pH  7.2 (average), temperature = 19–21 °C).

The ostracod specimens were always present in the Lake Room irrespective of the sampling season. No populational study has been performed so far, and hence, there is currently no estimation of the population size.

The Appendages were dissected and mounted in glycerol on the glass slides, whereas disarticulated carapace valves of the dissected specimens were stored dry in micropaleontological slides. Undissected specimens are stored in 90% ethanol. Appendages and valves were drawn with the aid of a camera lucida. Scanning electron images of valves of selected specimens were obtained with a JEOL SM-31010 Scanning Electron Microscope at the Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Localization of the cave

The map used in Fig.5A was created using Google Earth Version9.167.0.0 (25 July 2022), Movile Cave, Romania; 43°49′29′′ N, 28°33′40′′ E, 23m a.s.l. DigitalGlobe 2022. http://www.earth.google.com [25 July 2022].

Geometric morphometry analyses

For geometric morphometrics, the left female valve of Pseudocandona movilaensis was photographed in external view using an Olympus light microscope and an Olympus digital camera and processed by Adobe Photoshop62. To compare the valve shape of a new species with other 25 species of the genera Pseudocandona and Typhlocypris, we used published descriptions and illustrations (Table 1). The obtained outlines were digitized with TpsDig2 software, version 1.37 for further morphometric analyses63. The geometric analyses of the outlines were performed using the Linhart B-spline algorithm in Morphomatica v. 1.6 using 32 control points64. The obtained Mean Delta Square distances were used as morphological disparities between the obtained valve outlines. The distance matrix was subsequently used to discriminate between species belonging to three groups: A) 13 species of the genus Typhlocypris, B) seven species of the rostrata-group of the genus Pseudocandona, and C) five species of the compressa-group of the genus Pseudocandona (Table 1). We used Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) implemented in the PERMANOVA+ add-on to PRIMER v7 software to predict the genus/species-group to which individual species belong based on the valve shape and to diagnose misclassification error65. Having the CAP model, Pseudocandona movilaensis was placed onto the obtained canonical axes to classify this species into one of the three existing groups specified above. In addition, we performed a test of the null hypothesis of no differences in the within-group multivariate dispersion among the three groups by PERMDISP routine in PERMANOVA+ 65.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from 38 specimens, representing nine selected ostracod species of the subfamily Candoninae (Table 1, Table S1). Details of the DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing procedure were described previously41. The DNA barcoding fragment of Cytochrome-c-Oxidase subunit I gene (COI)66 was amplified using standard primers LCO1490/HCO219867. The cleaned PCR products were directly sequenced in both directions with the BigDyeTM terminator cycle sequencing method using the PCR primers by Macrogen Inc. BLAST68 searches against the non-redundant database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) were performed to verify the sequence similarity of the amplified region. The 38 newly obtained sequences of COI were aligned with MAFFTv7.40569 using the automatic algorithm and trimmed in GENEIOUS 10.0.2 (available at: http://www.geneious.com) leading to 567bp long alignment. The number of unique haplotypes was calculated in DnaSp70. As a potential outgroup, three haplotypes of Candona candida and two haplotypes of Candona weltneri were used. All sequences were deposited in GenBank with the accession numbers (Table S1).

Mean genetic distances under the Kimura 2-parameter model (K2p)71 between COI data set obtained from the nine ostracod species were calculated in MEGA X 10.0.372 (Tables S2 and S3). For graphic presentation of the relationships among the studied species, Neighbour-Joining (NJ) tree for COI data was generated using K2P distances with 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA.

Data availability

The type series of the new species are available in the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba (NSMT) (Pseudocandona movilaensis sp. nov.). The sequence datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN013132. Species locality and accession number for the specimens of the new species are presented in Supplementary material Table S1.

References

  1. Engels, A. E. Observations on the biodiversity of sulfidic karst habitats. J. Cave Karst Stud. 69(1), 187–206 (2007).

    Google Scholar

  2. Mulec, J. & Engels, A. S. Karst spring microbial mat microeukaryotic diversity differs across an oxygen-sulphide ecocline and reveals potential for novel taxa discovery. Acta Carsol. 48(1), 129–143 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  3. Mulec, J. et al. Assessment of the physical environment of epigean invertebrates in a unique habitat: The case of a karst sulfidic spring, Slovenia. Ecohydrology 8(7), 1326–1334 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

  4. Brazelton, W. Hydrothermal vents. Curr. Biol. 27, 431–510 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

  5. Sarbu, S. M. Movile Cave: A chemoautotrophically based groundwater ecosystem. in Subterranean Ecosystems (Wilken, H., Culver, D.C. & Humphreys, W.F. eds.). 319–343 (Elsevier, 2000).

  6. Brad, T., Iepure, S. & Sarbu, S. The chemoautotrophically based movile cave groundwater ecosystem, a hotspot of subterranean biodiversity. Diversity 13(3), 128 (2021).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  7. Schreier, J. E. & Lutz, R. A. Hydrothermal vent biota. in Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences. 3rd Edn. 308–319 (Academic Press, 2019).

  8. Kalenitchenko, D. et al. Bacteria alone establish the chemical basis of the wood-fall chemosynthetic ecosystem in the deep-sea. ISME J. 12, 367–379 (2018).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hourdez, S. & Jollivet, D. Metazoan adaptation to deep-sea hydrothermal vents. in Life in Extreme Environments (di Prisco, G., Howell, G., Edwards, G. M., Elster, J. & Huiskes H. L. eds.). 42–68 (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

  10. Por, F. D., Dimentman, Ch., Frumkin, A. & Naaman, I. Animal life in the chemoautotrophic ecosystem of the hypogenic groundwater cave of Ayyalon (Israel): A summing up. Nat. Sci. 4, 7–13 (2013).

    Google Scholar

  11. Peterson, D. E. et al. Reconnaissance of ostracode assemblages in the Frasassi Caves, the adjacent sulfidic spring and the Sentino River in the northeastern Apennines (Marche region, Italy). Cave Karst Sci. 75(1), 11–27 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Flot, et al. Unsuspected diversity of Niphargus amphipods in the chemoautotrophic cave ecosystem of Frasassi, central Italy. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 171 (2010).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  13. Bauermeister, J., Ramette, A. & Dattagupta, S. Repeatedly evolved host-specific ectosymbioses between sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and amphipods living in a cave ecosystem. PLoS ONE 7, e50254 (2012).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  14. Galassi, D. M. P. et al. Groundwater biodiversity in a chemoautotrophic cave ecosystem: How geochemistry regulates microcrustacean community structure. Aquat. Ecol. 51, 75–90 (2017).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  15. Popa, I. et al. Rich and diverse subterranean invertebrate communities inhabiting Melissoreypa cave in central Greece. Trav. Institut de Spéol. “Émile Racovitza” 58, 65–78 (2019).

    Google Scholar

  16. Chen, Y. et al. Life without light: Microbial diversity and evidence of sulfur- and ammonium-based chemolithotrophy in Movile Cave. ISME J. 3, 1093–1104 (2009).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Hutchens, E., Radajewski, S., Dumont, M. G., McDonald, I. R. & Murrell, J. C. Analysis of methanotrophic bacteria in Movile Cave by stable isotope probing. Environ. Microbiol. 6, 111–120 (2004).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Flot, J. F. et al. Niphargus-Thiothrix associations may be widespread in sulphidic groundwater ecosystems: evidence from southeastern Romania. Mol. Ecol. 23(6), 1405–1417 (2014).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Kumaresan, D. et al. Microbiology of Movile Cave—A chemolithoautotrophic ecosystem. Geomicrobiology 31(3), 186–193 (2014).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  20. Sarbu, S. M., Kane, T. C. & Kinkle, B. K. A chemoautotrophically based cave ecosystem. Science 272, 1953–1955 (1996).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Dahl, T. W. et al. Brief oxygenation events in locally anoxic oceans during the Cambrian solves the animal breathing paradox. Sci. Rep. 9, 11669 (2019).

    Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  22. Sarbu, S. M. & Popa, R. A unique chemoautotrophically based cave ecosystem. in The Natural History of Biospeleology (Camacho, A.I. ed.). 637–666 (National Museum of Natural History, 1992).

  23. Boston, P. J. The search for extremophiles on Earth and beyond: What is extreme here may be just business-as-usual elsewhere. Ad Astra (Washington, D.C.) 11(1), 1–31 (1999).

    MathSciNet Google Scholar

  24. Jahn, A., Janas, U., Theede, H. & Szaniawska, A. Significance of body size in sulphide detoxification in the Baltic Clam Macoma Balthica (Bivalvia, Tellinidae) in the Gulf of Gdańsk. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 154, 175–183 (1997).

    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

  25. Hourdez, S. & Lallier, F. H. Adaptations to hypoxia in hydrothermal-vent and cold-seep invertebrates. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 6, 143–159 (2007).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  26. Theede, H. et al. Studies on the resistance of marine bottom invertebrates to oxygen-deficiency and hydrogen sulphide. Mar. Biol. 2, 325–337 (1969).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  27. Vismann, R. Sulfide tolerance: physiological mechanisms and ecological implications. Ophella 34, 1–27 (1991).

    Article Google Scholar

  28. Bagarinao, T. Sulfide as an environmental factor and toxicant: tolerance and adaptations in aquatic organisms. Aquat. Toxicol. 24, 21–26 (1992).

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  29. Culver, D. C. & Pipan, T. Adaptations to subterranean life. in The Biology of Caves and Other Subterranean Ecosystems (Culver D.C. & Pipan T. eds.). (Oxford University Press, 2019).

  30. Smith, A. J., Horne, D. J. Ecology of marine, marginal marine and non-marine Ostracodes. in The Ostracoda: Applications in Quaternary Research. Geophysical Monograph (Holmes, J.A. et al. eds.). Vol. 131. 37–64 (2002).

  31. Horne, D. J. Key events in the ecological radiations of the Ostracoda. Paleont. Soc. Pap. 9, 181–201 (2003).

    Article Google Scholar

  32. Horne, D. J. hom*ology and hom*oeomorphy in ostracod limbs. Hydrobiology 538, 55–80 (2005).

    Article ADS Google Scholar

  33. Wake, D. B. hom*oplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations?. Am. Nat. 138(3), 543–567 (1991).

    Article Google Scholar

  34. Schallreuter, R. E. Homeomorphy, phylogeny and natural classification: case studies involving Palaeozoic ostracods. in Evolutionary Biology of Ostracoda: Its Fundamentals and Applications (Hanai, T., Ikeya, N. & Ishizaki, K. eds.). 1041–1049 (Elsevier, 1988).

  35. Griffiths, H. I. & Holmes, J. A. Non-marine ostracods and quaternary palaeoenvironments. in Quaternary Research Association. Technical Guide 8. (2000).

  36. Laprida, C., Diaz, A. & Ratto, N. Ostracods (Crustacea) from thermal waters, southern Altiplano, Argentina. Micropaleontology 52(2), 177–188 (2006).

    Article Google Scholar

  37. Namiotko, T., Danielopol, D. L., Meisch, C., Gross, M. & Mori, N. Redefinition of the genus Typhlocypris Vejdovsky, 1882 (Ostracoda, Candonidae). Crustaceana 87(8–9), 952–984 (2014).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  38. Karanovic, I. & Sitnikova, T. Y. Morphological and molecular diversity of Lake Baikal candonid ostracods, with description of a new genus. ZooKeys 684, 19–56 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

  39. Furtos, N. The Ostracoda of Ohio. Bull. Ohio Biol. Surv. 29, 411–524 (1933).

    Google Scholar

  40. Karanovic, I. Recent Candoninae (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Candonidae) of North America. Rec. West. Aust. Mus. Suppl. 71, 1–75 (2006).

    Article Google Scholar

  41. Wysocka, A. et al. Monophyletic status of European morphogenera of the subfamily Candoninae Kaufmann, 1900 (Ostracoda: Candonidae) in relation to their mtDNA phylogenies. J. Crust. Biol. 39(5), 567–573 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  42. Meisch, C. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe. in Süßwasserfaunavon Mitteleuropa 8/3 (Schwoerbel, J. & Zwick, P. eds.). 522 (Spektrum Akademischer, Gustav Fischer, 2000).

  43. Külköylüoğlu, O. et al. Correlational patterns of species diversity, swimming ability and ecological tolerance of non-marine ostracoda (Crustacea) with different reproductive modes in shallow water bodies of Ağrı region (Turkey). J. Freshw. Ecol. 34(1), 151–165 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  44. Karanovic, I. & Lee, W. A review of candonid ostracods (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida) from East Asia, with descriptions of five new species from South Korea. Zootaxa 3368, 7–49 (2012).

    Article Google Scholar

  45. Karanovic, I. & Petkovski, T. K. Two new species of the subfamily Candoninae (Ostracoda) from Montenegro (SE Europe). Crustaceana 72(6), 608–616 (1999).

    Article Google Scholar

  46. Smith, R. J. & Takahiro, K. Four new species of the subfamily Candoninae (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from freshwater habitats in Japan. Eur. J. Taxon. 136(1–34), 3–11 (2015).

    Google Scholar

  47. Martens, K. & Horne, D. J. Preface: Ostracoda and the four pillars of evolutionary wisdom. Hydrobiology 419, 7–11 (2000).

    Article Google Scholar

  48. Hodin, J. Plasticity and constrains in development and evolution. J. Exp. Zool. 28(1), 1–20 (2000).

    Article Google Scholar

  49. Arendt, J. & Reznick, D. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what we learned about the genetics of adaptation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23(1), 26–32 (2008).

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  50. Howarth F.G. &Moldovan O.T. The ecological classification of cave animals and their adaptations. in Cave Ecology (Moldovan, O.T.,Kováč L. & Halse S. eds.). 41–67 (Springer Link, 2018).

  51. Christiansen, K. Morphological adaptations. In Encyclopedia of Caves (eds Culver, D. C. & White, W. B.) 386–397 (Elsevier/Academic Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar

  52. Danielopol, D. L., Olteanu, R. & Lete, C. Carapace morphology of Cytherissa lacustris (Cytherideidae): Its interest for the systematics and the phylogeny of the group. in Cytherissa (Ostracoda), The Drosophila of Paleolimnology. (Danielopol, D.L., Carbonel, P. & Colin, J.-P. eds). 47–48, 27–53 (Bull. l’Inst. Géol. Bassin Aquitaine, 1990).

  53. Rouch, R. & Danielopol, D. L. L´origine de la faune acuatique souterraine entre le paradigme et du refuge et le modele de la colonization active. Stygologia 3(4), 345–373 (1987).

    Google Scholar

  54. Benson, R. A. Biomechanical theory of Ostracode carapace morphology. Paleontol. Soc. Pap. 9, 89–100 (2003).

    Article Google Scholar

  55. Benson, R. H. Morphologic stability in Ostracoda. in (Swain, E. M. Ed.) Biology and Paleobiology of" Osrracoda. Proceedings of the 4th meeting of the Ostracod workers in Newark (Delaware) 1972. Vol. 65(282). 13~i6 (Bulletins American Paleontology/Paleontological Research Institution, 1975).

  56. Por, F. Sulfide shrimp? Observations on the concealed life history of the Thermosbaenacea (Crustacea). Subt. Biol. 14, 63–77 (2014).

    Google Scholar

  57. Tanaka, H. & Yasuhara, M. A new deep-sea hydrothermal vent species of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from the Western Pacific: Implications for adaptation, endemism, and dispersal of ostracodes in chemosynthetic systems. Zool. Sci. 33(5), 555–565 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

  58. Iepure, S., Namiotko, T. & Danielopol, D. L. Evolutionary and taxonomic aspects within the species groupPseudocandona eremitaVejdovský (Ostracoda, Candonidae). Hydrobiologia 585, 159–180 (2007).

    Article Google Scholar

  59. Gross, M. Zur Ostracodenfauna (Crustacea), Paläoökologie und Stratigraphie der Tongrube Mataschen (Unter-Pannonium, Steirisches Becken, Österreich). Joannea Geol. Paläontol. 5, 49–129 (2004).

    Google Scholar

  60. Agalarova, D. A., Kadyrova, Z. K. & Kulieva, S. A. Ostracoda from Pliocene and Postpliocene Deposits of Azerbaijan. 1–420 (Azerbaijan State Publishers, 1961) (in Russian).

  61. Boomer, I., Guichard, F. & Lericolais, G. Late Pleistocene to recent ostracod assemblages from the western Black Sea. J. Micropalaeontol. 29, 119–133 (2010).

    Article Google Scholar

  62. Strake, A., Danielopol, D. L. & Neubauer, W. Comparative study of Candona neglecta valves from the shallow and deep sites of Lake Mondsee. Ber. Inst. Erdwissenschaften K.F. Univ. Graz 13, 83–88 (2008).

    Google Scholar

  63. Brauneis, W., Linhart, J., Stracke, A., Danielopol, D.L., Neubauer, W. & Baltanás, A. Morphomatica (Version 1.6) User Manual/Tutorial Mondsee User Manual/Tutorial. 1–82 (Limnological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 2006).

  64. Iepure, S., Namiotko, T. & Danielopol, D. L. Morphological diversity and microevolutionary aspects of the lineage Cryptocandona vavrai Kaufmann 1900 (Ostracods Candon-inae). Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Limnol. 44, 151–166 (2008).

    Article Google Scholar

  65. Anderson, M.J., Gorley R.N. & Clarke K.R. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. (PRIMER-E, 2008).

  66. Hebert, P. D., Ratnasingham, S. & de Waard, J. R. Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. B 270(1), S96–S99 (2003).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  67. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 294–299 (1994).

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  68. Altshul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).

    Article Google Scholar

  69. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  70. Librado, P. & Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452 (2009).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  71. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111–120 (1980).

    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  72. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants of theRomanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI project number PN-III-P4-PCE-2020-2843 (EVO-DEVO-CAVE) within PNCDI III and PN-III-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0016 (DARKFOOD) within PNCDI III. TN and AW benefitted from internal grant of University of Gdansk no 531-D200-D895-22. SEM images were obtained during the visit of TN at the Zoological Museum of the University of Copenhagen supported from the SYNTHESYS Project (DK-TAF-1429) financed by the European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 "Capacities" Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emil Racoviţă” Institute of Speleology, Clinicilor 5, 400006, Cluj Napoca, Romania

    Sanda Iepure&Serban M. Sarbu

  2. Faculty of Biology, Department of Evolutionary Genetics and Biosystematics, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland

    Anna Wysocka,Michalina Kijowska&Tadeusz Namiotko

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Chico, CA, 95929, USA

    Serban M. Sarbu

  4. Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, University Babes Bolyai, Cluj Napoca, Romania

    Sanda Iepure

Authors

  1. Sanda Iepure

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Anna Wysocka

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  3. Serban M. Sarbu

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  4. Michalina Kijowska

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  5. Tadeusz Namiotko

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Contributions

S.I. and T.N. conceived the idea, S.M.S., S.I. and T.N. collected thematerial, S.I., A.W., M.K. and T.N. designed the methodology and conducted the analyses, S.I., A.W., M.K. and T.N. performed data analysis, S.I. and T.N. led manuscript writing with significant contributions of A.W. and S.M.S. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanda Iepure.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (10)

Cite this article

Iepure, S., Wysocka, A., Sarbu, S.M. et al. Anew extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania. Sci Rep 13, 6112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32573-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32573-w

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

A new extremophile ostracod crustacean from the Movile Cave sulfidic chemoautotrophic ecosystem in Romania (2024)
Top Articles
How to Connect Metamask Web Wallet to CoinStats | CoinStats Help Center
Here’s How Long You Should Study for the Most Popular IT Certs
Calvert Er Wait Time
El Paso Pet Craigslist
Southside Grill Schuylkill Haven Pa
Zitobox 5000 Free Coins 2023
Fusion
Obituaries
How to Type German letters ä, ö, ü and the ß on your Keyboard
Comenity Credit Card Guide 2024: Things To Know And Alternatives
Culos Grandes Ricos
Craigslist Alabama Montgomery
Enderal:Ausrüstung – Sureai
Premier Reward Token Rs3
800-695-2780
Jackson Stevens Global
My.tcctrack
Praew Phat
Copart Atlanta South Ga
ZURU - XSHOT - Insanity Mad Mega Barrel - Speelgoedblaster - Met 72 pijltjes | bol
Gina Wilson All Things Algebra Unit 2 Homework 8
Busted Mcpherson Newspaper
Like Some Annoyed Drivers Wsj Crossword
Costco Jobs San Diego
San Jac Email Log In
Cvs Sport Physicals
Imagetrend Elite Delaware
031515 828
Elijah Streams Videos
R/Mp5
Imagetrend Elite Delaware
Amazing Lash Bay Colony
United E Gift Card
Datingscout Wantmatures
Royal Caribbean Luggage Tags Pending
Here’s how you can get a foot detox at home!
Cookie Clicker The Advanced Method
18 terrible things that happened on Friday the 13th
Let's co-sleep on it: How I became the mom I swore I'd never be
Author's Purpose And Viewpoint In The Dark Game Part 3
Janaki Kalaganaledu Serial Today Episode Written Update
2132815089
Online-Reservierungen - Booqable Vermietungssoftware
Adams-Buggs Funeral Services Obituaries
Kenwood M-918DAB-H Heim-Audio-Mikrosystem DAB, DAB+, FM 10 W Bluetooth von expert Technomarkt
Advance Auto.parts Near Me
Zits Comic Arcamax
Myhrkohls.con
How to Get a Check Stub From Money Network
What Responsibilities Are Listed In Duties 2 3 And 4
Kindlerso
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Fr. Dewey Fisher

Last Updated:

Views: 5587

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Fr. Dewey Fisher

Birthday: 1993-03-26

Address: 917 Hyun Views, Rogahnmouth, KY 91013-8827

Phone: +5938540192553

Job: Administration Developer

Hobby: Embroidery, Horseback riding, Juggling, Urban exploration, Skiing, Cycling, Handball

Introduction: My name is Fr. Dewey Fisher, I am a powerful, open, faithful, combative, spotless, faithful, fair person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.